David Becker Profile picture
Apr 1, 2021 18 tweets 3 min read Read on X
We're understandably focused on bills/laws being proposed/passed to restrict voting and which hurt election integrity in several states, but we should be paying particular attention to what is happening in TX, right now. /1
In a late night vote, the TX senate just passed SB7, which puts significant restrictions on voting, in a state where it's already harder to vote than almost anywhere else. /2

TX SB7 prohibits efforts by election officials to encourage or educate voters about early and mail voting options. It even requires those who need to vote by mail due to disability to provide a gov't document or a doctor's attestation that they are "disabled." /3
TX SB7 outlaws drop boxes and further limits early voting, and disenfranchises any voter whose ballot is delivered by anyone other than herself or by mail. If an elderly voter's spouse delivers the ballot by hand to election officials, that ballot "may not be counted." /4
TX SB7 allows ONLY partisan "watchers" the ability to roam anywhere they want in polling places, regardless of the work poll workers are doing, and use wireless devices in voting locations. No one else would have this power. /5
And perhaps most troubling, TX SB7 gives ONLY these partisans the power to video and record voters while they are casting a ballot. I honestly cannot recall a recent state law expressly encouraging partisans to engage in such potentially intimidating conduct. /6
Even when SB7 tries to do something good, it seems to be written to fail. For instance, TX is one of only a handful of states that currently allows voting to be conducted with unauditable electronic ballots. TX is way behind on election security on this point. /7
95% of US voters vote on auditable paper ballots, incl. voters in all of the battleground states, incl. GA, FL, OH, AZ, NV, PA, etc. But not in TX, where they cannot effectively audit or recount ballots in much of the state. /8
SB7 says TX finally has to move to auditable paper ballots, but for some reason delays that until 2026, even though the rest of the country is already there, or in those few remaining places without paper ballots, will be there by 2022. /9
This means that TX is likely to be the only state without auditable, recountable, secure paper ballots for the 2024 presidential election. SB7 enshrines that in law. /10
Let's be clear - the entirety of TX SB7 is built upon a lie - that the election of 2020 was insecure or rife with fraud - when we know the opposite is true. 2020 was the most secure and transparent election in history, and in 2020, that led to large GOP victories in TX. /11
TX's and the nation's success in the 2020 election was thanks to the tireless work of election off'ls of both parties, who made sure that voters had convenient options, while maintaining a transparent and secure process. /12
The ingenuity and diligence of election off'ls at the state and local level in TX and elsewhere not only led to record high turnout in 2020, but also unprecedented transparency, security, and integrity. SB7 would outlaw such local control and ingenuity. /13
TX SB7 significantly increases barriers for eligible voters who have disabilities, or might need assistance, or might need to work multiple jobs and find a convenient time to vote at night or on a day off. That's bad enough, but that's not all it does. /14
TX SB7 also has a disastrous effect on election integrity by allowing use of wireless devices in polls, delaying a move to paper ballots, and concentrating more voting into a single day, reducing the early warning system that mail/early voting provides against fraud or hacks. /15
I don't think it's going too far to say that TX SB7 cements TX's status as not only the state that restricts voting more than any other, but also as the least secure state for elections, with the most concerns about integrity. TX was improving, but this is a step back. /16
This is the reason many of TX's outstanding election off'ls have been outspoken in their opposition to SB7, and to the restrictions on their ability to run accessible and secure elections for eligible voters. /17
As the TX legislature considers this, and other, bills, one hopes that they and their colleagues in other states will listen to the professional election administrators, who know best how to run secure elections. /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Becker

David Becker Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @beckerdavidj

Jul 30
In the past 24 hours, .@elonmusk has posted multiple false claims about voters being "imported" illegally. These claims are 100% false, and I again implore him to talk to actual election officials or experts to learn the reality of our secure elections. /1
1. Voting by non-citizens in federal elections is already illegal, and has been illegal under federal statute for nearly 30 years. /2
2. All voters - every single one - must provide ID, under fed'l law, to register to vote in federal elections. That ID is checked against motor vehicles files or Social Security. /3
Read 6 tweets
Jul 29
As disinfo continues to spread claiming (falsely - see my piece below) that the Dems cannot place the party's official nominee on every state's ballot in August, keep an eye on the possibility that the GOP may try to swap out its official VP nominee, and how the disinfo changes 180 degrees at that point. /1

usnews.com/opinion/articl…
There has been speculation Trump may be having second thoughts about Vance. But even though this is different from the Dems, as Vance is the official nominee at this point (the Dems have no official nominee yet), it's still almost certain Rs could replace Vance if they choose, but they'll need to move expeditiously. /2
The RNC has rules in place for this (as does the DNC), and this wouldn't be historically unprecedented. In 1972, George McGovern replaced Tom Eagleton after he was chosen as the official nominee at the convention. In August, 1972, he withdrew and was replaced by Sargent Shriver. /3
Read 7 tweets
Jan 9
As Trump's counsel are preparing for the (very likely losing) argument that he is entitled to almost blanket immunity from criminal acts because he was acting in his "official capacity" when he tried to steal the 2020 election, we should remember three important facts:

/1
1. The President of the U.S. plays no role in election administration or certification. The president has no "official capacity" with regard to elections whatsoever under U.S. law, particularly when he is a candidate.

/2
2. The DC Circuit held last month that "when a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act." Trump was clearly acting as a candidate, seeking to steal an election that he lost.

/3
Read 5 tweets
Apr 19, 2023
The Dominion v Fox News lawsuit was never going to be the end of accountability for all the damage done to democracy by the election lies over the last several years. But it may be the beginning. /1
The size of the settlement is staggering. It's likely the largest defamation settlement in US history, larger than all but one VERDICT (which can be much higher) in history. It is clear Fox News was petrified of having its executives testify about their knowledge of the lies. /2
In addition, note that there appears to be no confidentiality with the settlement. Most defendants demand confidentiality in exchange for a large cash settlement, but Fox News caved on this. Despite the high legal burden Dominion had, Fox knew its case was very weak. /3
Read 12 tweets
Apr 18, 2023
🧵

It's been 1000 days since @ElectionInnov offered grants to all states to help inform voters how to navigate the process during COVID, and still, disinfo about these grants persists. Some prominent people, incl. @elonmusk, seem to have been misled about these grants. /1
The grants were offered to all states, and were entirely voluntary. Republicans and Democrats alike chose to apply and receive the grants. R secretaries of state in states like Florida, Iowa, Missouri, and Ohio received millions in grants (as did Ds). /2 Image
The grants were for nonpartisan voter education, sent to all voters, regardless of party. Every state could apply, and every state got what they requested. These grants funded mailings and ads to help voters navigate voting during the COVID pandemic. /3

electioninnovation.org/research/ceir-…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 14, 2023
🧵

Today, I informed @ericstates_info that I will not accept renomination as a non-voting member of the board when my term expires this week. I remain very proud of leading the effort to create ERIC, and supporting its expansion to over half the states in a decade. /1
In the last year, efforts by election deniers to attack ERIC have ramped up, and lies have been spread about me and the work of @ElectionInnov. 26 Republicans and conservatives recently wrote in support of the truth and our bipartisan/nonpartisan work. /2

electioninnovation.org/2023/03/13/in-…
The truth is that ERIC remains the best tool to keep voter lists accurate, and combat voter fraud. In a decade, ERIC has helped over 30 states correct 35M records of voters who had moved, clean 1M duplicate records, and remove over 500K dead voters from the voter lists. /3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(