Immigrants here illegally (as well as residents who were incarcerated) will potentially be eligible to $27,000 in unemployment benefits from NY back-dated to mid 2020 and covered through Sep ‘21.
$2.1 billion price tag covered via $1.9 trillion Stimulus.
The Stimulus does not allocate $2.1 billion direct funds for this. But the Stimulus does send many billions to NY to cover its deficit which means other state money (direct or via debt) can now be allocated to this program.
NY Dems were outraged that the Trump Tax Cuts placed a limit on SALT (State & Local Tax) deductions. But those Dem are now proposing to raise tax on the wealthy.
Are they for or against rich people paying more?
Oh, only more for NY is ok; not more for the federal gov.
This is odd because NY leaders begged @JoeBiden to send more federal money to NY.
This “needed” tax hike comes as NY state lawmakers are proposing a $2.1 billion fund to give unemployment benefits to convicts and illegal immigrants backdated to mid 2020 through Aug 2021.
NY is creating a $2.1 billion unemployment benefits fund in part for convicts who couldn’t work last year and lose their job due to COVID—19 to then get Unemployment.
It’s like granting compensation for people who didn’t develop cancer because they didn’t help at Ground Zero.
NY State has a 13% tax rate on Cannabis and the law lets municipalities ban local sales.
Those two factors will keep the dark market going.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2 million non-Jewish Arabs live in Israel, and Jews were "Palestinian" the same as non-Jews.
On the flip side, Palestinianism today is predicated on the notion that the area should be free of Jews; the same as in Nazi Germany.
Israel = Inclusivity.
Palestinianism = Nazism.
2/ It's not that Antisemites attach themselves to the "Palestinian" cause. The movement IS antisemitic because if Jews are Palestinian, then "Palestine will be free" from what? The Israel government? Um, if we call it Palestine, Jews will still be in the government. Then what?
3/ "Palestine" is a geographic area that had Jews, Muslims, Christians, so to use "Palestinians" as non-Jews only is Nazism.
This is worse than a white guy who wants NYC to be 91% white as it was in 1948. It's worse because Palestine in 1948 was +50% Jewish, then Arabs invaded.
1/ Why didn’t Obama & Dems make Juneteenth a federal holiday a decade ago?
Simple. The day came into focus only when Trump had planned to return campaigning on 6/19/20. Faix storm ensued.
To own Trump, a federal holiday was born.
I am not complaining; I am giving you history.
2/ Check the Twitter feed of many congressional and Senate Dems, TV heads, and leftists pundits. Most of them literally never sent a tweet about Juneteenth before it became an issue to own Trump in 2020; some only had a mention here and there in previous years.
3/ For example, in all her years on Twitter until 2020, @SpeakerPelosi’s account had tweeted only 4 times abut Juneteenth.
In 2020 alone she tweeted it 4 times; passed a House resolution about the day and got it signed a federal holiday in June '21 by Biden.
- There are no 250+ deaths from the rescue; sure not mostly civilians.
- There is no famine; 99.9% people are full-faced.
- It is not a "camp" of "refugees." It is a fully-developed neighborhood by people who never lived elsewhere.
It's a movement predicated on brazen lies!
Gaza claimed that 23,300 of its citizens died in the first 3 months of the war.
That's 260 deaths a day; 90 days in a row.
If true, the strike in Rafah 2 weeks ago; the strike on a "UN warehouse" last week; and deaths from the rescue would hardly be news.
It's a BS Machine.
No one sane refers to Hasidim in Williamsburg as refugees despite their grand parents having escaped from Europe and from Muslim-majority countries 70-80 years ago. Yet grandkids from Jordanians who worked 2 years for Jews in Haifa in the 1940's, are called refugees...
Can a POTUS retroactively revoke his political opponent's presidential privileges which paves the way for a raid on and prosecution of his opponent who is now seeking immunity from this POTUS?
The answer is yes. Biden did just that.
A Biden Judge asked the attorney of Biden's Political Opponet if a POTUS has the authority to take out his political opponent, and if the answer is no then it implies that Biden('s DOJ) can continue to try to take out his political opponent...
1984 wasn't this convoluted.
The Biden DOJ asked Trump for docs.
Trump claimed executive privilege (EP).
DOJ went to the WH for help.
Biden Deputized the National Archivist to revoke Trump's EP.
She did.
DOJ affidavit mentions violations of Archive laws (created by action above) as a reason to raid! 🚨