One of the plot holes in Libertarianism:
Historically, goverment revenue mostly comes from either tariffs or income tax. So, if tariffs are bad and taxation is theft, WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM?
This British Parliament tax history page goes into more details on the history, and will help clarify what I'm saying in the first post. parliament.uk/about/living-h…
But essentially, what the international merchant types did was take the burden off themselves and made the little guy to pay for everything.
Progressive income tax??? Wasn't that one of the planks of the communist manifesto? So why is Marx putting international banking oligarchy ideas in his COMMUNIST manifesto???🤔
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That's pretty much it. Oh, 'yellow jounalism'.
And 'yellow journalism' was just the British sending WT Stead over to teach Hearst 'government by journalism'.
"How do you do, fellow STEM graduates who can't get a job?" archive.ph/B00Gy
You're always given the impression that these things 'just happen', instead of the cause being some guy named Krumholtz writing a letter to some guy named Chertoff.
The Union Banking Corporation was set up in 1924, long before Hitler was in charge of anything, to manage Thyssen's investments in America.
So if they did anything, they sat on his money to keep making money off it instead of turning it over to the US government.
Gee, that's crazy that bankers would do that, huh. Has anyone else figured this out before?
Kurt Schneider, another 'natsee eugenicist', who upon closer examination, just turns out to be a Rockefeller stooge. Researchers keep making this mistake because they fail to check where the funding for the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry was coming from.
You generally don't quit your prestigious job as an Institute Director to just be a plain old doctor in the Army.