@_Serene_96 @Carvo__ @NickJFuentes Okay so forcing people to do things. Yes, you can force people to do things if you can afford the force. It's an extra expense, and it's permanent.

And as soon as that force gets removed, they're still Africans and revert to genetic baseline.
@_Serene_96 @Carvo__ @NickJFuentes You're saying "lets put a really expensive time bomb inside ourselves". How bout you just have good quality people at the genetic level that you don't have to manage so much? Then you can have more freedom as well.
@_Serene_96 @Carvo__ @NickJFuentes This reminds me of leading by orders and leading by task. Poor quality troops have to be told specifically what to do. Good quality troops can be given a general order - more freedom. What you're describing is bringing in poor quality people and reducing freedom to compensate.
@_Serene_96 @Carvo__ @NickJFuentes And the term for this reversion to genetic baseline is "being liberated" or "empowered". That's not all those terms mean, it also means taking stuff from white people. But that's one aspect of "empowerment" is the removal of strictures that kept black acting like white people.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FREESOIL 🇮🇱

FREESOIL 🇮🇱 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Freesoilyeah

28 Mar
@MarkMcCaig @TexasGOP Depending on perspective, it could be counter-racist and counter-semitic. The Jews in the US are not the same as the Jews in Israel.

Do you think democrats are awful? Jews are the drivers of the democrat party, and 75% of Jews vote democrat in the US. They're not Israelis.
@MarkMcCaig @TexasGOP Maybe you should be more empathetic and understand the rage. When you say "racist", you only mean white people having insufficiently positive views of, mainly, blacks. I.e. you're "concerned" about the least racially-aware race being slightly less browbeaten.
@MarkMcCaig @TexasGOP The younger generation doesn't care about lolbertism. The US is about race struggle. It's race-land. How do young people respond to anti-white narratives? Push back or accept? The GOP offers zero pushback.
Read 4 tweets
13 Mar
@WildHoodLawyer @PALE_Primate @Steve_Sailer So obviously there's two issues. The first is the assumed causation in all of this. I assume you know that basic problem.

The second is the "extended genotype". This argument could also be made, to a far more extreme extent, across species.
@WildHoodLawyer @PALE_Primate @Steve_Sailer What kind of environments do chimpanzee children grow up in? Pretty poor. What happens when they're adopted by humans? They become more socialized.

The problem with human subspecies is that they're so much closer it feels intuitively plausible that this doesn't apply.
@WildHoodLawyer @PALE_Primate @Steve_Sailer Compare East Asians in their own countries vs. East Asians in the US. Compare Africans in their own countries vs. Africans in the US.

If you want to call that "environment", that's neat, but if the "environment" stems from the genotype, it's not fungible.
Read 5 tweets
12 Mar
@ImmuneHack @wil_da_beast630 On UK data, keep in mind the A-levels are NOT a single standardized test. The tests a person takes are determined by the level of classes they take in school. And thus you will see a compression effect when comparing between groups.
@ImmuneHack @wil_da_beast630 That said, the things you're proposing here are the ONLY serious environmental factors explaining part of the race-IQ gap. And they're the only factors that can seriously narrow the "g" gap. Send someone to school a long time, or make them take IQ practice tests if you want...
@ImmuneHack @wil_da_beast630 ... to just pump up the IQ numbers. But you're actually dealing with some underlying physiological factors that are the kinds of things that can impact "g". So I applaud you in being a bit more serious than most academics on this.
Read 11 tweets
12 Mar
@wil_da_beast630 First off, N=1.

Second off, you may have been trying to prove a point by scoring deliberately low the first time. And since we know that "left wing" people are more willing to lie, and you're clearly motivated on this, that's not something that should just be hand-waved away.
@wil_da_beast630 Third off, applying this to the charter-public school gap, if there even is one, is a leap. Lottery voucher studies (really natural experiments) have shown rather decisively that there is no significant effect from "good schools".
@wil_da_beast630 Now this will be resisted by flashing studies and authors' conclusions, which is an example of what should be called "regime flavor". For example, Sandra Scharr described the MTAS as vindicating an environmental hypothesis. So inb4 doing that.
Read 6 tweets
12 Mar
@ZihoParkEcon @EPoe187 No? Blacks were gifted a parallel society instead of being sent back to africa. All of the "lack of opportunity" claims are blacks being barred access to whites.

Segregated schools for example. Is that an advantage or disadvantage for whites?
@ZihoParkEcon @EPoe187 Blacks had their own institutional nexus. Their own businesses, schools, neighborhoods. There was nothing written in stone that it was destined to be worse.

Of course it was because of genetic differences. The whole disparity between Europe and Africa attests to that.
@ZihoParkEcon @EPoe187 But when you say "blacks in 'the US' had less opportunities than whites in 'the US'", well that's a product of being from a different sub-country. They were in the "black US". Sure, Romanians probably had less opportunities too. Are we on the hook for that?
Read 5 tweets
11 Mar
@Duke_Libertas Once you get into wars of mass mobilization, the concept of the "decisive battle" becomes less important, unless you define "battle" more broadly. For example, the "battle of France", if that's classed as a "battle", was extremely decisive.
@Duke_Libertas Basically, when the entire army is 50,000 men, and it's in one location, and communication is what we would consider extremely poor, all sorts of wild things can happen in an afternoon. Naval warfare retained the capacity to stackwipe 5 years of production in a day far longer.
@Duke_Libertas When armies get bigger, a decisive outcome in one "tactical-level" battle is almost impossible by WW1. The closest you can get is something like Sedan, where a tactical level battle later led to a broader strategic encirclement even if the losses at Sedan itself were unimportant.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!