I post this because a lot of people liked the initial tweet, seeing it as a cute platitude.
No. It's telling you that "race" cannot "explain" any outcome. The politics of a society is what explains those outcomes.
No child does anything "because they are black", because no child "is black". That doesn't deny that society labels that child as black and acts upon that racialization. It doesn't even deny that the child reacts in response.
That dynamic is the issue, not the child.
So if someone says "abolish blackness" (I'm using this one because people are sensitive about the parent ideology), it can't be about hurting the child racialized as black.
That racialization hurts the child. They can be so much more if allowed to be free.
But I will say it in fact.
We must abolish whiteness, and the offshoot categories it created like blackness.
We must see the ideology that categorized us and told us it's true, and the dynamic and harms it imposes on us. Let's abolish that ideology so that we can all just, be.
So let's talk about racial ideology, let's talk about how society racializes us and the politics that create these outcomes that we then fight about. Let's talk about how it harms us.
Let's resist internalizing these racial categories as essential elements of our being.
I sincerely hope at some point more of my brothers and sisters that are racialized as white will see how much this ideology restrains our unified potential, and how many people it requires sacrificing to maintain.
To tear it down isn't to tear you down, but to set us all free.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Racist stereotypes are much easier to reinforce in a person's mind than they are to refute.
Most of the evidence for this claim is from John Ogbu who studied a couple cities in the early 2000s and generalized. So here's another city, more recently.
Other researchers have investigated the claim that smart black kids are ostracized for being smart. It's been bunk for years.
Rorschach Tweet - tweets containing enough social cues to be read 100% accurately by groups A and B, with both groups having violently conflicting reads.
A Rorschach Tweet example.
X: "fjlsuk adrhl chdet jdtyuf."
Group A: "Yeah, dogs are totally cute!"
Group B: "This monster wants to kill cats!"
I have felt frustrated seeing tweets that make sense to me, and others also think it reasonable.
Then, I see others without those cues who have reads that I think are ridiculous. But are their reads really invalid?
I have zero moral high ground on this. I've been on both sides.
One of the challenges of "criticizing your own side" when they go against your stated principles is it invites others to jump in and attempt to discredit the entire set of principles.
My own principles require that I speak out when my friends violate those principles. I ask and hope for the same from those on "the other side". Your principles should come first and foremost.
So, let's create positive space for that.
I should be able to address people who are fighting racism when they do so in a way I don't think is healthy, without having people seeing it as an opportunity to attack the entire anti-racism project itself.
People really think "why isn't transracialism okay?" is a gotcha in their argument for race as a biological reality, but all they do is display their misunderstanding of social constructs.
Also, people have quite often chosen their "race". So-called passing is a useful tradition in American history, where people who were black legally (!) said they were white to get access to certain things. As long as they were believed, they were white.
Math, like science, is no friend to racists. Let's do a thread on scientific racism, math, and the claims they downplay in public.
The HBD'ers (Human Biodiversity, a.k.a scientific racists) claim that the average Nigerian IQ is 69. That says >50% of Nigerians are intellectually disabled. That's ridiculous, but let's keep going.
Let's stick with Nigerians, but note that the estimates from Richard Lynn (cited all over by HBD'ers) says all of Africa is around IQ 70.
The average "white" American IQ according to the HBD guys is 100.
If talking about white privilege is "woke" or "critical race theory", then those camps already represent the majority of Americans.
59% think being white helps one's ability to get ahead.
Pew asked a similar question in 2017, and a majority of Americans acknowledged white privilege then as well.
If the right and their allies continue to designate the belief in things like "white privilege" and "systemic racism" as woke or critical race theory, they'll continue to separate themselves from the American majority.