This erroneous construction is a demonstration of the obverse of the CT piece yesterday.
We can affirm all at once that Jesus is both perfect & fully human.
We can affirm all at once that he suffered injustice & was divinely ordained to suffer & that he gave his life willingly.
We can affirm all at once that Jesus is both perfect & fully human.
We can affirm all at once that he suffered injustice & was divinely ordained to suffer & that he gave his life willingly.
https://twitter.com/joshbuice/status/1377950800618651656
Also, and again, Jesus suffered *the Triune God’s* wrath, not only the Father’s (as if the divine attributes are able to be parceled out among the persons anyway).
Theological error is (at least) a result of one of more of the following:
1) our failure to properly distinguish btw categories;
2) our failure to maintain particular categories;
3) our overemphasis of a particular category at the expense of another legitimate category.
1) our failure to properly distinguish btw categories;
2) our failure to maintain particular categories;
3) our overemphasis of a particular category at the expense of another legitimate category.
I have read enough of @JoshBuice’s tweets to know that 1) he is passionate abt theological faithfulness and 2) he is incredibly wary of anything that sounds like current political discourse from the progressive left. Unfortunately in this case I think he has sacrificed #1 for #2.
My hope in saying this and in writing the thread is that he will delete the tweet and address whatever concerns he has about the atonement in relation to our current political climate from a more sure theological footing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
