Some are arguing Georgia’s voting law is perfectly fine because other states have less early voting or similar rules. But Sec 2 of the VRA is about the specific circumstances in each state.
There’s no plausible way to describe George’s law other than a Republican attempt to chip away at voting opportunities for the constituencies that flipped the state blue in 2020 and 2021.
Whether that attempt will succeed in depressing the minority vote is an open question. But bad intent is enough to establish a section 2 VRA violation.
When the Senate amended section 2 in 1982, it was clear that the “totality of the circumstance“ in each state must be the measure of whether voting rules are discriminatory. It is not a bright-line rule, as much as some may long for one in this context.
There are three main headwinds: 1. a kneecapped Voting Rights Act w/ a vestigial Section 5 as a result of the Shelby County decision in 2013
2. Uncertainty over the meaning of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the remaining teeth in the law which could be knocked out or filed down by a pending case that SCOTUS is set to decide in the coming months.
NEW: a third lawsuit against Georgia's voting law brought by the NAACP-LDF, ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center emphasizes the harms to *all* voters in addition to the discriminatory effects and purposes against people of colour.
BREAKING: a second lawsuit is filed against SB 202, Georgia's new voting law. Georgia NAACP & other orgs allege purposeful discrimination in addition to harmful effects under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and the 1st, 14th and 15th amendments.
The thing is, claiming someone is in cahoots with Venezuelan dictators is not “vituperative or abusive“ like calling someone a yellow-bellied scoundrel. It’s a highly specific defamatory factual claim.
Fox’s attorney, Paul Clement, all but threw Sidney Powell et al under the bus in his motion to dismiss the defamation suit against Fox.