Following my tweet yesterday on the new edition of Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology - if you're not familiar with this book here's why it's awesome - it covers 5 qual approaches - TA, IPA, grounded theory, discourse & narrative analysis. For each there is a "how to" guide
written by "experts" (e.g. me & @ginnybraun for TA, @BrettSmithProf for narrative analysis), then a doing chapter often written by a grad student/ECR applying the approach to an interview dataset - which is reproduced in the book, with further interviews on the companion website
So for the doing TA chapter @GarethRTerry shares his experience of using TA to analyse 2 interviews with ex-soldiers about their experiences of leaving the army. He starts with answering the 'many questions' of TA & reflecting on his assumptions before diving into the six phases.
Then for each approach there's an edited version of a published report with a reflective commentary from the author(s). For TA @GarethRTerry et al. reflect on a TA study of body hair removal - so both this & the worked eg in my & @ginnybraun's chapter focus on appearance & the...
body. But that's not all! Editors Evanthia Lyons & @AdrianCoyle5 are spoiling you with chapters on the foundations of qual research, ethics, a brand new for this edition section on data gathering - covering interviews, social media & visual data. And we haven't even gotten to the
companion website yet with additional exercises and videos for each approach. Here you will find @GarethRTerry talking about the importance of understanding your theoretical perspective when doing reflexive TA: study.sagepub.com/lyons-coyle3e
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A thread on qual interviewing. I've been talking to students this week about to embark on their first interview so I thought I would share my tips here for anyone about to do the same! Feeling nervous/anxious about doing your first interview is normal! I am very shy/socially
2/ anxious & I take comfort in the fact an interview is a structured social encounter - you have a role to play, so does the interviewee. You will hit your stride - for most around interview 3/4. A practice run with a friend or family member can really help boost your confidence!
3/ If you have the opportunity to watch a research interview take it! There's no better way to learn. My PhD supervisors also encouraged their students to participate in research & that was so helpful to get a feel for an interview from the "inside". There are loads of different
1/ Following the recent publication of a paper on online qualitative surveys with @ginnybraun@lgoatley@Elicia_Boulton & Charlotte McEvoy here's a thread of resources for qually survey research. Starting with that paper which is currently open access: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
3/ @ginnybraun & I first wrote about qually surveys in our textbook Successful Qualitative Research - the companion website includes egs of surveys and survey datasets for use in teaching: uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/succ…
1/ Following on from a great thread by @DrAdamJowett yesterday - here are some suggestions on doing qual research in a context of physical distancing. First off check out my @ginnybraun & @DrDebraGray's edited book Collecting Qualitative Data: cambridge.org/core/books/col…
2/ This book is all about methods & data sources that either don't involve participants or don't require physical interaction between researchers & participants - like email interviews, online forums, qualitative surveys & story completion. It grew out of a seminar held at UWE -
3/ Qualitative Research in an Age of Austerity. Talks from a second book launch seminar (on qual surveys, online forums, email interviews, story completion & vignettes plus a keynote from @BrendanGough7) can be watched on my YouTube channel: youtube.com/channel/UCLBw6…
Anyone having to teach #thematicanalysis & qual methods online @ginnybraun & I have lots of resources you can use - here's an hour lecture providing a basic intro to our TA approach (please feel free to use in yr teaching rather than reinvent the wheel):
This lecture maps out different approaches to #thematicanalysis & covers quality and good practice (so will work as lecture 2):
Our companion website for our textbook Successful Qualitative Research has loads of resources - a flip card glossary of key terms & concepts 4 revision, a bank of MCQs, a focus group audio file 4 practising transcriptin, data for practising coding, egs of research materials...
@ginnybraun & I first wrote about #thematicanalysis over 13 years ago! We've written a lot more since then including most recently some reflections on & expansions of our thinking. Here is a thread of these starting with a commentary on why *reflexive* TA: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
In this interview with our frequent TA collaborator @drnikkihayfield we reflect on the context 4 & the assumptions we made in writing the paper, how our thinking has changed & the ways reflexive #thematicanalysis is often misunderstood: tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
A commentary on #thematicanalysis saturation 'experiments' & our case for why data saturation doesn't make sense for reflexive TA and doesn't have a place in generic quality criteria for qualitative research: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…:
1/ @slsibbald asked for my & @ginnybraun's thoughts on theme saturation & this deserves a whole thread of its own - to unpack our gaaaahhhhh! reaction... There are several papers that set out to determine how many interviews (or focus groups) are required to achieve saturation in
2/ #thematicanalysis & make (somewhat nuanced/contextualised) claims about the number of interviews necessary to achieve theme or data saturation. In our view these papers make some rather extraordinary assumptions that speak to fundamental philosophical differences between
3/ coding reliability TA & our reflexive approach. For example, most of these papers consider a code saturated when 1 instance has been identified. For us the notion that the work of a code is done with 1 instance identified is rather puzzling. But when we look at what is being..