A recent poll has made a big splash about the potential of this #Supermajority. But if we take a moment to just look at the polling trend lines, it's far too early to be making any sort of prognostication about any such thing.
Plus SNP majority? What SNP majority?
[1/11]
➡️Trend line since January 2021 - early April
Even to a layman's eyes, the downward trajectory of SNP support in regional polling is obvious.
If anyone is interested, the trendlines are local regressions (LOESS)
[2/11]
Here the same downward trajectory can also still be seen with SNP constituency polling; albeit their support on the constituency has a higher upper level it's declining from.
[3/11]
➡️Eroding SNP support since last year
If we look wider than Jan 2021, we see on the regional polling a consistent picture of eroding SNP support.
August 10th - March 19th. Since this time snap, SNP list polling has fallen sub 40%; the picture has worsened since March.
[4/11]
And it surely goes without saying that an SNP barely scrapping one or two list MSPs isn't going to secure a majority (they need 65 MSPs for an outright majority).
The regional polling suggests another minority SNP gov't is most likely.
[5/11]
Even on the constituency, if we take a wider look it's clear SNP polling has been eroding since last year.
Oct 7 - March 19 indicates the scale of the lost SNP support. The trend lines Jan to April 2021 do not, based on the trend lines, suggest any change to slow slide.
[6/11]
➡️Nicola Sturgeon's approvals
Based on Survation polling Nicola Sturgeon's personal numbers have gotten worse since the 2016 election.
These survation polls are Scotland specific.
[7/11]
While the Scotland-specific numbers show Ms Sturgeon's personal ratings in decline among Scots; her UK wide ratings are even worse. Here is renfield and wilton strategies recently recording their lowest ever net rating for the FM.
[8/11]
So what can we conclude from all of this?
1⃣ Don't bother with individual polls, they are meaningless in isolation. Merely a snapshot in time. What matters are the wider trends of data.
2⃣ There is no reason to assume (so far) the SNP's downward trend lines are halting
[9/11]
3⃣ The First Minister wanted the Hamilton Report to be a strategic 'reset' moment, I don't see much evidence of that having happened (so far)
4⃣ The election has a long way to go, so stop your fussing over individual polls everyone. Spare yourself the heart palpitations.
[10/11]
5⃣ Based on the data trends *so far* the most likely outcome is another SNP minority government...BUT...
6⃣ I repeat one last time for emphasis IT IS TOO EARLY TO MAKE SOLID PREDICTIONS.
[11/11]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How things started: according to Metropolitan Police Commissioner Matt Twist (at 3.25pm today 11/11/23) there were "no issues with it [Palestine march]"
So let's have a look at how it went before & after he said this shall we?
(1/12
'Peaceful protesters' openly supporting Hamas, no Met Police in sight arresting them despite them supporting a proscribed terrorist organisation
(2/12
Here's the same pair with a young kid as they openly touting their support for a terrorist organisation dedicated to exterminating all Jews on earth. Happens during the march, but Mr Twist insists there were "no issues with it". Maybe he needs to try looking harder?
(3/12
A thread pushing back on PROF @GoodwinMJ's strange twin claims that UK immigration is a story of "low skilled" or unskilled migrants entering the UK, thanks to a Tory party whose immigration policy is a product of "socially liberal" thinking (1/
For Goodwin's first claim to be true the latest immigration figure would need to show a mass influx of lower and unskilled migrants entering the UK; thus risking artificially holding down wage increases for those at the lower end of the labour market.
(2/
But the latest UK immigration statistics prove this isn't a story of low or unskilled immigration at all.
For one thing, the 606,000 figure is not a story of large numbers of unskilled migrants entering the UK.
(3/
Thread on SNP membership numbers shambles
▶️Evidence of ex-party members being handed the vote in leadership race
▶️SNP MP claims party finances "smell" amid compliance-breaking Murrell loan
▶️SNP HQ refusing to release number of members until *after* leadership race ends
(1/6
Mail revealed proof ex-SNP members voting in the party leadership election despite no longer being paid members. Some cases these ex-members also received messages pleading with them to resume membership to help keep the party finances "ticking over" (2/6
Issue of who is actually entitled to vote blew up after Ash Regan issued a public letter to SNP Chief Exec (and Sturgeon husband) Peter Murrell demanding SNP HQ come clean about how many party members actually exist (3/6
ScotGov seen as failing to perform on nearly all policy areas amid majority saying nation is on the “wrong track”. Brand SNP losing to Scottish Labour
Ipsos: 1,000 Scottish adults aged 16+, 29 September – 5 October 2022
(1/8
▪️Wrong track right track
➡️53% of Scots say the country is heading in the “wrong direction” (2/8
▪️Scottish Government performance
ScotGov is seen as failing to do a good job in eyes of voters on scores of issues.
👉51% day they’re doing a bad on improving the NHS (only 22% say “good job”
👉doing bad job improving education system 44% to 26% saying good job
(3/8
Thread on just some some of the contradictions & unanswered questions in the Scottish Government’s 3rd independence publication. Titled ‘Building a New Scotland: A stronger economy with independence’, its less a prospectus & more a glorified pamphlet
(1/18
➡️ “re-joining the European Union (EU) to benefit from, and contribute to, the vast European Single Market”
One of the proposals set out in this publication, it sits in contradiction to the currency policy of Sterlingisation (currency substitution) also set out.
(2/18
You see, the paper explicitly states the plan to “keep using the pound sterling, until the time is right to move to a Scottish pound.”
Putting aside the totally unaddressed question of how long would Sterlingisation last (a very important issue), the more obvious one is…
(3/18
Just what is happening in Beijing? And why you should care. A short thread.
Former Chinese Premier Hu Jintao led out of the room as the Communist Party Congress closes. It's hard to know what to make of this, but it is still an incredible moment to see captured on film.
[1/7
➡️Why does this matter?
Hu Jintao was Xi Jinping's predecessor, and it is well known Jintao and Jinping come from opposite wings of the party. Plus, this Congress only happens once every five years and is tightly choreographed.
[2/7
Xi Jinping has succeeded in securing an unprecedented 3rd term in office. He has now fully populated the top levels of decision making with his people from his wing of the party. After this Congress, Xi Jinping has a near total control unseen since the days of Mao
[3/7