Ryan Orbuch Profile picture
Apr 5, 2021 5 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Here's your reminder that the whole idea of a personal carbon footprint was a targeted BP media campaign in 2005 and it worked so well that it seems like we've all forgotten this researchgate.net/publication/30… Image
This piece goes into the history mashable.com/feature/carbon… and here's a 2006 op-ed from a guy who literally worked on the ad campaign acknowledging it nytimes.com/2006/08/14/opi…
Here's one of the ads from back then:

More in this piece: thred.com/change/how-the… Image
see also: most of recycling npr.org/2020/09/11/897…
New Exxon study out today from @NaomiOreskes:

"These patterns mimic the tobacco industry's documented strategy of shifting responsibility away from corporations—which knowingly sold a deadly product while denying its harms—and onto consumers." cell.com/one-earth/full…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Orbuch

Ryan Orbuch Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @orbuch

Oct 18, 2023
1/ A lot to learn from this story, including some interesting carbon market history on how the Kyoto Protocol laid a (fundamentally flawed) foundation for voluntary carbon markets.

The structural problem is simple: the business model of traditional offsets is false equivalency.
Image
The role of carbon markets should be to enable payment for the service of directly removing carbon: actually touching the carbon cycle. The sketchy accounting and tactics described here are made possible by paying for something very abstracted from the underlying carbon cycle.
False equivalency is the load-bearing lie that breaks the system. Much of what's been sold as an environmental benefit is worthless or damaging, but the traditional carbon brokers and registries can't acknowledge that: doing so would remove their justification for existence.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 5, 2022
An idea re carbon removal MRV: the community is confused right now partly because there's no market-legible price of MRV that expresses the uncertainty of a given approach as an actual dollar amount.

Breaking out the MRV "cost" from the removal price might be a good step.
Doing this would enable the MRV itself to have a initial price and (hopefully) a cost curve that can (and will!) move based on different factors than the "bundled" CDR price that's reported today.

Then, we as a community can focus on bringing MRV itself down the cost curve.
This could create a more honest stratification between "closed systems" like DAC where MRV looks like "put a meter on a CO2 pipe" and "open systems" like enhanced weathering or ocean akalinity enhancement which require baselining and modeling of a differential between (cont..)
Read 8 tweets
Dec 12, 2021
A weird property of the frontier: finding the edge forces a realization that there’s very few people there, the others who’ve found it are tightly clustered and therefore quite happy to see you, and you all can’t help but ask “where is everybody?” in escalating confusion
This, combined with the fact that the distance to the frontier is surprisingly short, is a giant mindwarp that might be the strangest thing so far in learning about climate

Anyone have similar experiences in other fields? It’s been difficult for me to articulate
Erika's thread is excellent -- she's one of few who's seen this in multiple fields (and has shaped a lot of my thinking on it!)
Read 5 tweets
Oct 28, 2020
For years, carbon removal has suffered from a lack of demand, and therefore been slow to scale.

With Stripe Climate, we hope to assemble a coalition of buyers to begin changing this.
When we made our first carbon removal purchases earlier this year with the help of our scientific advisors (stripe.com/blog/first-neg…), we asked carbon removal projects what one thing would most supercharge their progress. The vast majority listed “recurring demand”.
Without a committed purchaser, these approaches *won’t magically get cheaper*. In the absence of gigaton-scale federal carbon removal procurement, private companies must step up to help these technologies scale.
Read 6 tweets
May 18, 2020
👋🌎 With guidance from climate experts, @nanransohoff and our team allocated @Stripe’s money across four negative emissions projects!

We focused on storing more carbon outside of the biosphere:

stripe.com/blog/first-neg…

🧵/
1/ This field is diverse, approaches vary from reforestation and improving soil carbon storage to direct air capture, and speeding up the earth’s natural weathering process.

Basically, there are a handful of ways to take CO₂ out of the air and a handful of places to put it.
2/ As we met projects and learned more, one thing became clear: while solutions that store carbon in the biosphere are necessary and important, they won’t be sufficient on their own to remove as much CO₂ as we’ll need to.
Read 6 tweets
Oct 30, 2019
👋 I’ve been at Stripe for one year now!

It’s my first non-founder job. Coming in, I didn’t know what good looked like

The biggest thing I learned this year is that I could be motivated by the people I’m around, moreso than the idea of the thing we’re building
Previously, I’d worked on education, something I was quite emotionally drawn to

I imagined I’d have to twist payments around in my head until I could get emotionally attached to it

I didn’t! I’m not really emotional about payments and it... turns out that’s totally fine
I have a different flavor of motivation now

I feel like we could swap out our product for ~anything else and I’d be equally excited

This was super surprising to me, it’s not how I’d thought about myself, I didn’t realize I could have this different attitude towards work
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(