Reading a new paper on what income a Tunis family needs to live with dignity, I realized there's many methodological problems w/US $15 #LivingWage arguments - which contribute to the WAY too artificially low "15". First, the Tunis paper link (in FR): 1/7

international-alert.org/fr/publication…
How does Tunis paper start? 20 pages on methodology, focused primarily on ASKING ordinary ppl in 9 diverse groups what they need & having them debate & discuss. Premise that ordinary ppl have some knowledge of their own material needs would be revolutionary in US methodology 2/7
How do US papers calculate "living wage"? Taking some top examples, like MIT website (funded by companies that pay below $15 btw): little on methodology; also, data on consumer prices comes from OFFICIAL govt source like USDA-, which itself cites very OLD other govt sources 3/7
On food prices, for example, MIT gets from USDA which gets its "thrifty" food-cost plan from a 2006 USDA study which cites a 2001 study that "asked [low-income household people] what foods they consumed in a day". 4/7 fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/…
When I told this to @OuiemCh, she brought up another problem: asking poor people what they eat is not the same as figuring out what they NEED to eat. USDA divides between "thrifty", "low", "moderate" & "liberal" costs, so class division is baked in 5/7 fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/…
Framing your question is important: "Living" wage vs a "dignified" budget; these words make a difference. What you need to "live" ("living" wage) is not what you need to live a "dignified" life, so maybe US researchers need to learn something from Tunisia's dignity revolution 6/7
I believe US social science's monomaniacal obsession w/quantitative methods at the exclusion of sound & innovative qualitative methods can play a role in maintaining the status quo of economic & power relations, rather than merely _diagnosing_ the status quo 7/7
PS - now if we could get some research going on how to get wages in Tunisia & US & across the North/South divide generally to converge upwards instead of diverging (ie more global inequality) as they have been since 1980

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fadil Aliriza

Fadil Aliriza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!