New paper: Searching for Superstars 🌟
• Ability to attract talent is a moat 🏰
• Companies hiring talent from elite competitors and universities outperform 📈
• Company social networks / PageRank 🕸️
• March Madness-themed bonus section 🏀
The performance gap between the best and average worker is growing. However, unlike in sports, investors lack metrics to identify teams with top-tier talent.
(2/10) Human Capital Map
To solve this problem, we build a "social network" based on human capital flows from one company to another.
(3/10) Superstar Aggregators
We apply the PageRank algorithm to this network to find companies that are winning the War for Talent. We run a backtest and find these firms have outperformed the stock market.
(4/10) Wall Street vs. Silicon Valley
From a macro level, superstar talent has been fleeing Wall Street into Silicon Valley's open arms.
(5/10) Industry Clusters
Our graph allows us to cluster firms based on their hiring patterns. This provides a useful alternative to static industry classifications (GICS, SIC).
(6/10) University Alumni Portfolios
We build portfolios of companies that employ high concentrations of alumni from top universities. Here are the employers with the highest concentration of Ivy League grads.
(7/10) US News & World Report
Using US News & World Report rankings, we find that companies able to attract grads of the top 50 universities have outperformed.
(8/10) March Madness 🏀
We use hierarchical clustering to build a March Madness-style "bracket." Each match will be decided by a horse race of 2005-2020 performance of each school. Before you peek at the next Tweet, place your bets! 🏇
(9/10) Tournament Results
And the champion is ... UC San Diego 🏆!
(10/10) Conclusion
As in sports, the economy is increasingly driven by superstar talent. Companies with superstar teams have beat the market. Human capital flows allow us to find these winning franchises.
The CFA Institute just published a huge 144-page report on the failures of accounting for intangible assets.
"Intangible assets are fundamental to the modern economy but largely omitted from financial statements."
Here's a quick recap 🧵
1/ In 1979, the biggest companies were mostly capital-intensive energy firms. Today? They're asset-light tech, healthcare, and consumer businesses.
These modern firms are built on intangible assets, such as R&D, data, software, brands, and human capital.
2/ However, despite the growing importance of intangible assets, accounting rules still largely ignore intangibles - expensing them rather than recognizing them on the balance sheet.
As a result, book value explains less than 20% of the market cap of most leading firms.
1 | New Paper: International Intangible Value
Can investors take advantage of cheaper foreign markets without compromising on growth and innovation?
😢International Stagnation
🐢Intangible Underinvestment
🏅Intangible Leaders
📈Factor Backtest
⚖️Foreign Dilemma
(h/t @MebFaber, not investment advice, see full disclaimer in paper)
2 | International Stagnation 😢
International stocks have stagnated, primarily due to a lack of fundamental growth.
3 | Intangible Underinvestment 🐢
This slower growth is related to underinvestment in the intangible assets that drive growth today (i.e., 72% correlation).
Can factor investors benefit from an allocation to the “Intangible Value Factor?”
6️⃣ The Six-Factor Model
📈 Factor Returns
🎨 Model Portfolios
🦕 Fixing the Anti-Innovation Bet
✅ An Improved Factor Portfolio
Election Special: What is the return on investments in political influence?
📈Return on Influence
💰Lobbying
🗳️Campaign Donations
⚔️Partisanship
✨Intangible Value
What to do about bombed out "innovation stocks"?
🪦Death of Innovation
📜Two Centuries of Patents
🏭Investing in Innovation
🍱Innovation as an Asset Class
💬Avoiding Bubbles