Emails between NYPD and the controversial facial recognition startup Clearview AI are now in the public domain via a FOIL response on the nonprofit news site @MuckRock. They prompt questions about how the department administers access to the software: techpolicy.press/emails-between…
For instance, how does NYPD work w/ ICE using facial recognition? NYPD's face recognition policy statement says “Information is not shared in furtherance of immigration enforcement” & “Access will not be given to other agencies for purposes of furthering immigration enforcement.”
Are NYPD officials using Clearview accounts associated with personal email accounts and personal devices?
The emails show an active discussion on how to make Clearview AI's platform conform to legal and policy requirements- Clearview founder Hoan Ton-That promises such upgrades can be made once he secures a contract.
How does NYPD use facial recognition in connection to social media analysis? Emails suggest data from social sites may be employed in facial recognition searches.
Did NYPD use Clearview AI to investigate its own officers? As per @MylesMill this request appears to suggest it was initiated by the head of the department's internal affairs bureau:
1/ We started a podcast for @techpolicypress and yesterday we published the 8th weekly episode. We're looking at issues at the intersection of tech and democracy. You can subscribe here: techpolicypress.captivate.fm/listen
If you care about technology and democracy, stop what you are doing right now and read this epic @techreview piece by @_KarenHao. She reports Facebook's "AI algorithms gave it an insatiable habit for lies and hate speech. Now the man who built them can't fix the problem."
This piece is replete with inside perspective that confirms what many have feared- a company unfixable, unwilling and unable to confront the original sin at the core of its business model. And here is a man, the head of Responsible AI, unable to escape that reality.
.@_KarenHao one of the most important details in this piece may be this. Not only that no team is working on this problem, but that the backstop argument at Facebook is ultimately to argue it is a scapegoat. (1)
1. E. Jean Carroll Defamation and Federal Tort Claims Act Litigation 2. Summer Zervos Defamation Suit 3. Mary Trump Fraud Litigation 4. Panama Hotel Fraud and Tax Litigation 5. Doe v. The Trump Corporation Class Action justsecurity.org/75032/litigati…
2/
6. DC Civil Suit over Misuse of 2017 Inauguration Funds 7. Bennie Thompson Incitement Suit for Jan. 6 Capitol Attack 8. Eric Swalwell Incitement Suit for Jan. 6 Riots justsecurity.org/75032/litigati…
3/
9. NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund Voting Rights Case for Post-Election Actions 10. New York Attorney General’s Civil Investigations 11. Criminal Investigations into Trump’s Finances justsecurity.org/75032/litigati…
Rep. Zoe Lofgren publishes analysis of social media posts from 102 Republicans who voted to overturn the 2020 election techpolicy.press/rep-zoe-lofgre…
Said @RepZoeLofgren in the foreward to the nearly 2,000 page report: "“Like former President Trump, any elected Member of Congress who aided and abetted the insurrection or incited the attack seriously threatened our democratic government. "
"They would have betrayed their oath of office and would be implicated in the same constitutional provision cited in the Article of Impeachment."