NEW RESEARCH: Roundup, the worlds most used weedkiller, can kill bumble bees! Why this is important and what it means for pesticides, a thread:
doi.org/10.1111/1365-2… 1/17 Two bees, one sprayed with water and another with herbicide.
Roundup is the most popular brand of weedkiller worldwide, and glyphosate-based weedkillers make up about 20% of all pesticide use. 2/17
We tested consumer products, products I bought at supermarkets intended for garden use, as well as a widely used agricultural product; Roundup ProActive. 3/17 A picture of a bottle of Roundup meant for consumers
These products have NO LABEL RESTRICTIONS ABOUT BEES WHATSOEVER, not even the agricultural one. They even recommend spraying weeds as they flower. So bees foraging on flowering weeds, or glyphosate-resistant crops, can be sprayed directly with these substances. 4/17
HYPOTHESIS: Now if this is legal to do, surely these weedkillers are safe for bees? Surely when they're sprayed on bees they won't kill them? 5/17
METHODS: We sprayed bees in groups of 5 or 6 in a plastic box using the above-pictured spray bottle. This wasn't meant to be 'field realistic' for agriculture, we're just testing if these substances CAN kill bees at all. 6/17
As a control, we sprayed the exact same amount of water at room temperature, from the exact same type of bottle. 7/17
RESULTS: First: Roundup Ready to Use. This is your everyday consumer product, it's in just about every shed in the country. When applied to bees 94% (B) of them died within 24 hours versus just 4% (A) in the control. Pictured below is what it looks like. 8/17
What's going on here? Well from the pictures you can see that the Roundup bees look like they've been dunked in hair gel while the control bees like they just got out of the shower. We think this is the SURFACTANTS in the formulation causing the body hairs to mat together. 9/17
We also think these SURFACTANTS are blocking the bees breathing holes, essentially drowning them to death. Now remember we have a control where only 4% of the bees died, so this isn't about the amount we sprayed, it's about what's in the liquid we sprayed. 10/17
We also saw similar, but less mortality with the agricultural product Roundup ProActive, 30% mortality over 24 hours. Scary given this stuff can be applied an unlimited number of times a year to fields in industrial quantities. 11/17
Second: the consumer product Weedol- also glyphosate-based. This caused LESS mortality than the control, meaning it's not toxic at all. This very conclusively demonstrates that it's not glyphosate to blame here, it's the co-formulants (likely the surfactants)! 12/17
Discussion: What can we learn from this? Well, for one, herbicides are badly regulated. Because glyphosate itself is safe for bees, the 284 distinct products containing it in the UK can be applied with ZERO regard for bees safety. 13/17
This is irrespective of the co-formulants which differ from product to product and, as shown here, can be more toxic than glyphosate. We also show that herbicides CAN be bee-safe (Weedol), guiding the way for future product design. 14/17
Before I conclude I'd like to shout out @poshbee_eu for funding this work, @JAppliedEcology for publishing it, and my amazing co-authors for making it real (only @sphaerularia is on twitter). 15/17
To conclude. 1) Herbicide usage, by consumers and farmers, needs to be reassessed 2) The hundreds of different glyphosate products need to individually tested to ensure they're safe for bees 3) Co-formulants (surfactants) need to be studied because they can be dangerous! 16/17
Read the paper here doi.org/10.1111/1365-2… It's free to read and download. 17/17
@careygillam @PAN_UK @DaveGoulson @EuropePAN @EFSA_EU may be of interest to you all
@ErickMotta19 I think we did this work at the same time you did your awesome Roundup contact tox work! Only saw your paper when this thing was in its 2nd stage of review so we couldn't put more about it in. Exciting to replicate the work in bumbles!
@LynnDicks @MattEAShardlow This research was one of the reasons I objected to the glyphosate meta-analysis conclusion (it wasn't out at the time). We tested two glyphosate formulations (both 7.2g/L), one causes 96% mortality the other 3%. Co-formulants explain all the mortality

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Straw

Ed Straw Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdStrawBio

27 Feb
Is glyphosate toxic to bees? Why the new meta-analysis (Battisti et al., 2021) doesn't answer this question and what it really shows --> (Hint: it's co-formulants) 1/13
This question is very important as glyphosate is the worlds #1 pesticide active ingredient, and comes with no bee protections at all. The authors conclusions, as visible in the above figure, are that glyphosate overall is toxic to bees. 2/13
Now this assertion is a huge one to make, and to label the #1 pesticide in the world as 'toxic to bees' requires a huge amount of evidence to support this. Sadly this paper cannot support it's own conclusion because they've ignored co-formulants 3/13
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!