Frederik Christopher Profile picture
Apr 7, 2021 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
This was me, one year ago. After years in allocator seats, I joined a friend who was spinning out to set up his own fund. Strong team, track record, locked-up capital.

It was so much harder than I expected it to be.
First off: I was so enamored with the idea of helping to build something that I overruled my gut. I knew I wasn't a good fit for a sales role.
My friends know I'm more comfortable in the basement of the NY Public Library than bantering with a group of strangers. It is what it is.
Bad idea. Shortly after COVID hit I was let go.

I was angry. Resentful. But in the back of my mind I knew that I hadn't been a good fit.

Today I can see the positive that came out of it.
Now for any of you thinking about starting their own funds, this was the tweet that triggered my memory:

Dan is right. It's insanely hard. I've seen people much smarter and harder working than me try and not succeed.

There are some subtle dynamics at play that can be difficult to understand from the outside.
Allocators are often understaffed and swamped with pitches. They have their guard up.

Think of it like pitching a VC. @pmarca won't talk to you unless you can get an introduction. Think of your network as edge that you must cultivate to succeed.
Picking stocks is a commodity. You may think your work is special. Perhaps it is. But allocators have listened to the same pitch a hundred times.

Describing your process violates a cardinal rule of storytelling: "show, don't tell." Figure out how to show, how to be interesting.
I hope you don't think Howard Marks writes those letters for fun?

Or that Dalio puts out Bridgewater's Daily Observations because he likes to keep you informed?
Recognize the difference between the organization and the individual you're pitching.

Unfortunately you are a bad career risk. Allocators don't get a big bonus for picking a great fund that represents a tiny sliver of the portfolio.
But if you blow up? They'll have to answer for that. Nobody likes to lose money. Or look stupid.

You are asking someone to go out on a limb for you - despite your lack of track record, team, infrastructure. Unless you can build trust, your product has no chance.
To me, it all comes down to what you're trying to achieve. Are you building a business or a practice?

What is your measure of success? Building wealth or practicing your craft? Image
Blackstone is a business. They allow allocators to satisfice: to buy a product that reliably does the job and won't get you fired.

You can charge a premium for that and it scales nicely. It's what you want as a shareholder.

blackstone.com/press-releases…
My old boss wanted to run money his way: concentrated, flexibility in equities, credit, private assets. No shorting.

It was an expression of his style and personality. It didn't maximize his wealth. It wasn't what most customers wanted. But it allowed him to practice his craft.
I find that investors avoid analyzing their own businesses the way they would an investment.

I think it's because they like to think of themselves as artisans practicing a craft. They feel they do something unique.
The disconnect is when you confuse the two. When you act like an artisan but expect the results of a business.

I shared what little advice I have here:
neckar.substack.com/p/attempting-t…
Perhaps the best advice: leverage the new world of fintwit and learn from people in the trenches:
@SuperMugatu
@GavinSBaker
@NoonSixCap
@DennisHong17
@HaydenCapital
@ArtkoCapital
@1MainCapital
@AltaFoxCapital
and many, many others
Some favorite writing on the topic:

@GrahamDuncanNYC's "Letter to a friend who may start a new investment platform"

grahamduncan.blog/letter-to-a-fr…
Robert Vinall's "Thoughts on Becoming an Independent Fund Manager"
"It is not a roadmap to riches for the impresario, though a route to independence for the talented manager. That is in any case the only type who should be entering this industry."
rvcapital.ch/post/some-thou…
Great thread highlighting the different new roles and skills that come with independence.
"You must be a great stock picker, portfolio manager, manager of internal relationships, and a cultivator of external ones."
"Analyst, PM, boss, partner, client"
And of course MIT's @joelmcohen
"None of these managers worked at a name-brand firm. All launched their fund before the age of 35. Only one had a “pitchbook.” Many started out with <$5 million at the outset."

joelmcohen.medium.com/illuminating-t…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Frederik Christopher

Frederik Christopher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NeckarValue

Oct 25, 2023
What are your favorite pieces with reflections on investment success and failure or lessons from decades in markets?

A few that come to mind:
Mark Sellers: So You Want To Be The Next Warren Buffett? How is Your Writing?

"If your competitors know your secret and yet still can't copy it, that's a structural advantage. That's a moat."

"Trait #1 is the ability to buy stocks while others are panicking and sell stocks while others are euphoric.

When 1999 comes around and the market is going up almost every day, you can't bring yourself to sell because if you do, you may fall behind your peers."
Read 11 tweets
Sep 29, 2023
Very interesting new paper by @mjmauboussin on the corporate lifecycle.

Rather than go by age or size, the framework ties life cycle to cash flows.

Stages: Introduction > Growth > Maturity > Shake-out >Decline.

Roughly: Investing -> returning capital -> liquidating assets.
Image
Image
Unexpected:
"We expected low or negative spreads between ROIC and WACC for companies newly listed, rising spreads as they mature, a decline in senescence.

What we found was nearly the opposite. The spread at the date of the IPO was high and narrowed before stabilizing."
Image
Image
Companies going public (selling equity to new investors) when return on capital looks most attractive (and is about to decline)?

Returns to shareholders on the other hand were most attractive for more mature companies.
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 9, 2023
Druckenmiller: "I am so tired of being a bear, and being labeled a bear."

But: Liquidity ⬇️
"Since it's taken so long, the Fed has ended up with a higher terminal rate. Inflation gets stickier the longer its in the system. That increases the probability of a hard landing." Image
"We always short the same way. ... I try and think of a situation 12 to 18 months from now and if I think the security prices are going to be less, I short.

Frankly, I'm not sure I've ever made money in shorts. I like it. It's fun, but you can get your head handed to you."
"When I was at Soros, I shorted $200 million worth of Internet stocks in March of 99. And in three weeks covered them at a $600 million loss. I lost $600 million on a $200 million investment in three weeks.

I was short 12 stocks. They all went bankrupt Every one of them."
Read 6 tweets
Jun 8, 2023
ROIC and margins for companies with different moats by @mjmauboussin ImageImage
"A company creates value when its ROIC is in excess of cost of capital. Stated differently, it makes a dollar worth of investment worth more than a dollar in market value.

The market broadly appreciates this, especially when growth is considered as an additional variable."
"Markets are akin to an ecosystem where investors fill various niches. Investors with a short-term horizon tend to focus on near-term metrics such as sales and earnings.

Investors with a long-term horizon focus on competitive advantage and the size of the market opportunity."
Read 5 tweets
May 24, 2023
Like other great investors, Sam Zell used content as a form of leverage. His "guide to the risky art of resurrecting dead properties" earned him his nickname, the Grave Dancer. Image
"Some might see buying and creating value from others’ mistakes as a form of exploitation, but I see it as giving neglected or devalued assets new life.

Often in my career I’ve been the only bidder for them—the last chance for a resurrection."
"I’m not claiming to be altruistic— just optimistic, and confident that I can turn those assets around.

That, in my definition, is an entrepreneur. Someone who doesn’t just see the problems but also sees the solutions—the opportunities."
Read 10 tweets
May 9, 2023
Druckenmiller keynote on debt, entitlements, and the dollar.

"The Fed can’t save us."
"The demographic storm is just getting under way." ImageImage
"In 20 or 30 years there will be fewer young workers, many more seniors that need support… and the starting point is the highest national debt in our history."
"Booming economies in 2018 and 2022 never had worse fiscal results. Unless something changes, this Bipartisan “Ratcheting effect” will continue." Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(