If you go back through my feed, you'll see tweets like this one. I'm rabidly pro-vaccine, but also supportive of the fact that there's two sides to the question, that instead of bullying people for questioning vaccines, we should empathize with them:
Sometimes a feel alone. All I see on my twitter feed is toxic bullying of those who have questions about vaccines -- without anybody actually answering those questions. Am I wrong? Should I be bullying instead of empathizing?
Please get your covid vaccine as soon as possible. Those aren't "side effects" -- those are the "effect" of the vaccine that tricks the body into feeling sick without making it sick. So brief fatigue/headaches/mild-fever are normal right after -- it means it's working.
I, too, distrust the government.
But believing the government is always wrong is at least as fallacious as believing the government is always right. It's also a fallacy to believe the government is responsible for the vaccines (they really aren't).
The emergency exception is not something that avoids the FDA's processes but is instead part of the process. They know within a certain range the vaccine's safety. The range of uncertainty is simply wider than normally approved -- but acceptable.
"Refuse to hear" works both ways. I can't imagine rejecting your siblings because of your own strongly held religious/political views. I love my siblings and would do anything for them, even though they are annoying poopy faces.
I can't imagine dehumanizing people who disagree with me on politics or science. Moreover, it just doesn't work. The more people who remain unvaccinated, the worse off it is for the rest of us, as they act as resevoirs.
We don't no precisely, but we have confidence in the range of such things. And the maximum of that range is still far less than the permanent damage caused by the virus to your lungs and organs. It's risk v. risk -- and the vaccine is FAR less risk.
How do we identify variants? By sequencing the genes. While the press refers to them by where they were first detected, they are given numeric identifiers. cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
Distrusting and questioning big pharma is good.
But the belief they are always evil is at least as fallacious as believing they are always good.
Your life expectancy is significantly longer because of big pharma, even if they profit from this, so do you.
People do die after taking the vaccine, but at roughly the same rate that people die anyway. The numbers are so close such even if the vaccine is responsible for some, we can't tell. But conspiracy theorists distort the statistics to make this claim anyway
The effort to dig tunnels depends upon the size of the tunnel -- but this grows faster than you think. Twice the width of the tunnel means FOUR TIMES the effort to dig it. You can see that with the following circles: the larger is twice the width of the 4 smaller ones
Subway tunnels to fit rail cars are often around 28 feet, Elon's trying to get his tunnels below 14 feet. This means creating tunnels with ¼ the effort, a quarter of the cost. Instead of $200million for the Las Vegas project, $50million.
College programming courses are horribad. They are college -- they attempt to teach you the theory of coding rather than practice. Thus, they leave you totally unequipped to actually code.
To be a good coder you need both theory and practice, so I can't say that colleges are wrong in focusing on theory. I'm just saying that you need practice. If you enter college having already practiced, the theory will make much more sense.
If you try to learn coding by picking up a college textbook and all that theory looks like gibberish, drop it and find a book that focuses on practice instead. But later, go back to that college textbook and learn theory. Both are needed.
So let's explore why Tim Cook is stupid about thinking we can vote from phones.
To make internet voting work, you first need to have a national ID card. This is ironic because in the above interview, Tim Cook criticizes the Georgia voting law that has an ID requirement, then proposes Internet voting that needs more of an ID requirement.
Online banking works because banking tracks every transaction back to the user. The principle of voting is that you cannot track votes back to the person who cast them. Voting is anonymous: you can track the fact people voted, but not who they voted for.
I interpret this as answering the question whether all this mask wearing, social distancing, and lockdowning actually works to stop the spread of disease. I think the answer is conclusively that it does.
I interpret this as answering the question whether the covid was no worse than the flu. This shows that the covid was wildly more infectious than the flu.
This.
First, find people of your same level to hang around with, that can explain things in your own terms (experts explaining things over your head really sucks).
Start "sysadmining" the Raspberry Pi. Find fun projects. At some point, start playing around with networking on it. Explore all the fun command-line tools, like 'traceroute'. Use 'openwrt' as your home router and "netadmin" that heck out of that.
Now install web services on your RPi and play around with that, watching how your web server can serve raw HTML containing CSS and JavaScript. Create your own website. Now buy a domain name and push out to an AWS server. Make a LAMP app that serves stuff from an SQL database.
Orwellian surveillance of citizens' every financial transaction is the problem in tech. That's why there will never be cash currency greater than $100 bills -- to prevent large anonymous transactions that gov can't surveill.
It's like how Eliot Spitzer got caught "structuring" payments to prostitutes to avoid detection. The crime wasn't paying for sex, the felony was evading government surveillance.
The heavy cost of surveillance makes it nearly impossible for Americans to get bank accounts overseas. Even simple exchange students find enormous hurdles getting foreign bank accounts.