Based on the cross-sectional study of Coutinho, Zuurbier, and Stam in 2012, the incidence of rare blood clots in the brain (cerebral venous thrombosis or CVT) is 1.32 per 100,000 people per year, and 2.72 per 100,000 people per year.
For the UK reports of CVT in those who received the AZ vaccine, there were 30 out of 18,000,000. That would be 0.002 per 100,000 per year or 2 out of 1,000,000,000 (as of April 2021). Compare this with the real world numbers of 1.32 and 2.72 per 100,000 without AZ vaccine. Why?
Cerebral venous thrombosis risk is higher in people with increased tendencies to produce blood clots. So for people with known blood disorders or on medications that increase clotting tendencies, these are the ones who are at risk for CVT.
Take note, not all cerebral venous thrombosis cases are fatal if diagnosed and managed early. The risk of dying from Covid-19 is much higher, and the contagiousness is a given already.
For Asians, who show more tendency to bleed than clot, there are very little published data (CVT is rare). The biggest study for CVT was in Iran where the incidence was 12.1 per 1 million people per year.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Leonard Pascual

Leonard Pascual Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drbrainhacker

10 Jan 19
A valid question asked to me: "Do you want our (UPCM) grads to be mediocre.

I am not confrontational whether real life or socmed, and regardless if the senior person is nice or mean, I accord the same respect so here was my answer:

Short version: No.
Longer kilometric version:
Far from it sir/ma'am. We can be and will continue to strive to be excellent as 5 star physicians as stated in our mission vision.
We should be evidence based, as our mentors have taught us, to scrutinize with a critical mind the sources of information we encounter, not just in the medical literature but also in real life, most especially on social media.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!