The second day of Wayne LaPierre's testimony in the NRA bankruptcy trial is about to begin.

Catch up on what happened yesterday with this recap, and follow my live coverage at @lawcrimenews.

lawandcrime.com/high-profile/n…
James Sheehan, the charities bureau chief for @NewYorkStateAG, says that they plan to finish questioning LaPierre today.
James Sheehan starts questioning LaPierre about flights that he had to pay back in part.

Q: You don't know the basis for calculating percentage of the amount that you had to pay back?

A: No, I did not do the calculation.
NYAG's counsel to Wayne LaPierre

Q: You've flown exclusively by private charter for several years.

A: That's correct.
LaPierre testifies that he has picked up his niece on private flights, on the NRA's dime.
Sheehan asks whether the NRA paid tens of thousands of dollars for a hair stylist for Wayne LaPierre's wife.

"I don't know what the NRA paid for," LaPierre responds, before adding unresponsive commentary later stricken by the judge.
NYAG's counsel to Wayne LaPierre:

Q: Were you disciplined for receiving excess benefits?

A: I learned something that I did not know.

(Counsel objects at answer as unresponsive, and LaPierre tries again.)

A: Yes, I was disciplined. I paid it back.
Sheehan is now questioning LaPierre about Joshua Powell, the NRA's ex-second-in-command.
Questioning turns to Oliver North, who LaPierre acknowledges attended his wedding.

Note: They since had a falling out, with the NRA accusing North of plotting a coup attempt against the group's leadership.
When NRA president, Oliver North sent a letter to the audit committee questioning billing by the Brewer firm & accusing LaPierre of financial improprieties.

Sheehan asks whether LaPierre opposed North's relection after that.

"This whole thing is a contrived narrative," LP snaps
NYAG's counsel James Sheehan has that defensive answer as non-responsive.

Judge Hale reminds LaPierre that the NRA's counsel will have the opportunity to question him.
Questioning turns to Ackerman McQueen, the NRA's longtime PR firm, which is now also opposing the gun group's bankruptcy petition:

"I believe that they tried to extort me when I wouldn't back off on trying to see their books and records," LaPierre claimed.
NYAG's Sheehan asks LaPierre about his travel and entertainment expenses for the NRA since 2015.

Q: It's over a million dollars isn't it?

A: I traveled all the time for the NRA. It could be in that range.
Sheehan asks whether some of the expenses were paid through the NRA's ex-PR firm Ackerman McQueen.

LaPierre concedes that's possible.
Same pattern:

Wayne LaPierre continues defensive outbursts in response to questions by NYAG's counsel. The judge chides him, and the NRA's own lawyer reminds him to stick to yes or no answers, when possible.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

8 Apr
Now that Wayne LaPierre's grilling by the NYAG's counsel has wrapped up, catch up on a recap of Day Two testimony here.

LaPierre's now being questioned by Ackerman McQueen's Mike Gruber.

Thread continues here, @lawcrimenews. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/n…
Gruber is now rolling tape from LaPierre's March 23rd deposition, where he cited the NYAG's action to dissolve the NRA or put it into receivership as the reason to file for bankruptcy.
NRA's general counsel John Frazer previously testified that he did not know that he did not know Wayne LaPierre's contract allowed him to file Chapter 11, Gruber notes.

Gruber asks LaPierre about that.

LaPierre: "I don't know what Mr. Frazer understood at that point."
Read 6 tweets
7 Apr
Wayne LaPierre has now taken the stand in the NRA bankruptcy trial. Here is our preview story on his testimony, which will be updated throughout the day.

Follow my live-feed, @LawCrimeNews. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/n…
James Sheehan, the @NewYorkStateAG's charities chief, is currently grilling him.

Q: Is it true you send no emails?
A: That's correct.

Q: Is it true that you send no texts?
A: That's correct.
Sheehan asks LaPierre about whether he filed the bankruptcy petition to dodge the NYAG suit.

"We filed this bankruptcy to look for a fair legal playing field where the the NRA can prosper and grow," LaPierre claims, calling the New York atmosphere toxic and weaponized.
Read 22 tweets
7 Apr
Evidence in the NRA bankruptcy trial:

The Brewer law firm sent a bill to the NRA's general counsel in 2020. One of the lines charged $59,155.25 marked "Russia," the invoice shows.

Ackerman McQueen's questioning the general counsel on it right now.
A lawyer objected to the line of questioning, citing confidentiality.

Judge Hale struck it from the record.
Ackerman McQueen's lawyer Mike Gruber opposed it being stricken.

(Background: Ackerman McQueen was formerly the NRA's longtime PR firm, but after a protracted falling out, opposes the group's bankruptcy petition.)
Read 7 tweets
23 Mar
The late RBG once famously compared gutting the Voting Rights Act because of social gains to tossing an umbrella because you're dry.

On the latest "Objections" podcast, @CommonCause director @TheSylviaAlbert says we're about to get "soaked to the bone." podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sto…
In the clip at the top of the thread, Ms. Albert was talking about the legacy of the SCOTUS ruling in Shelby County. She talked about what's at stake in the Brnovich case heard earlier this month here.

You can listen to the full podcast here.

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/sto…

You can also watch the interview on the YouTube page.

Read 4 tweets
19 Mar
Lots of responses to this headline:

If the phrasing "sensational and impure" strikes you as something out of the late 19th century, that's because it is.

A quick tumble into this ruling's citations.
In the Maxwell decision, the phrase "sensational and impure" is cited to the Second Circuit case U.S. v. Amodeo, decided in 1995 and governing public access issues, including for SDNY.

That case, in turn, cites another case for that language.
That citation goes to the Supreme Court of Rhode Island from 1893, a state court decision outside the Second Circuit's jurisdiction from the turn of the century.

Back then, a reporter wanted divorce records, the judges found, to satisfy mere curiosity. casetext.com/case/request-o…
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
BREAKING and Developing on a new ODNI-released report:

"New U.S. Intelligence Community Report Confirms 2020 Election Was Secure, Despite Campaigns By Putin's Russia and Iran"

The report is inside the story, @lawcrimenews. lawandcrime.com/high-profile/n…
🚨The IC found Russian military fingerprints behind the Burisma narrative:

"In late 2019, GRU cyber actors conducted a phishing campaign against subsidiaries of Burisma holdings, likely in an attempt to gather information related to President Biden's family and Burisma."
The IC found multiple men tied to both Trump allies and Russian intelligence gravitating around Ukraine narratives, including Paul Manafort's associate Konstantin Kilimnik and Rudy Giuliani-tied Andriy Derkach.

These details have been woven into the updated story above.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!