Darren 🥚🐣🕊️ Profile picture
Apr 9, 2021 16 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1/ Assessing mandatory stay‐at‐home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID‐19 (Bendavid, Oh, Bhattacharya, Ioannidis)

"After subtracting less-restrictive NPI effects, we find no benefit of more-restrictive NPIs on case growth in any country."
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
2/ "In the absence of empirical assessment, the effects of NPIs on reduced transmission are assumed rather than assessed.

"The slowing of COVID-19 epidemic growth was similar in many contexts in a way that is more consistent with natural dynamics than policy prescriptions."
3/ "We estimate the unique effects of more-restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs) on case growth rate in the spring of 2020 by comparing effects in other countries to those in Sweden/South Korea.

"The data consists of daily case numbers in subnational administration regions of each country."
4/ "Because the true number of infections is not visible, it is impossible to assess the impact of national policies on transmission.

"We follow other studies and implicitly assume that observed dynamics may represent a consistent shadow of the underlying infection dynamics."
5/ "The average daily growth rate prior to NPIs ranged from 23% (95CI 13% to 34%) in Spain to 47% (95CI 39% to 55%) in the Netherlands.

"The variation of pre-policy growth rates may reflect testing coverage and pre-policy behavior changes."
6/ "While the effects of 3 individual NPIs were positive (contributing paradoxically to case growth) and significant, the effects of about half of individual NPIs were negative and significant.

"The combined effect of all NPIs were negative and significant in 9 of 10 countries."
7/ "After accounting for less-restrictive NPIs (lrNPIs), none of the 16 comparisons (vs. Sweden or South Korea) had more-restrictive NPIs (mrNPIs) that were significantly beneficial.

"The 95% confidence intervals excluded a 30% reduction in daily growth in all 16 comparisons."
8/ "In this framework, there is no evidence 'lockdowns' contributed to bending the curve in England, France, Germany, Iran, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, or the U.S. in early 2020.

"Most of the effect sizes point to an *increase* (not stat. significant) in the case growth rate."
9/ "It is possible that stay-at-home orders facilitate transmission if they increase contact in closed spaces.

"Data on individual behaviors show dramatic decline days to weeks *prior* to implementation of business closures and mandatory stay-at-home orders in our countries."
10/ "School closures cost an estimated 5.5 million life-years for U.S. children during the spring closure alone.

"Considerations of harm should play a role in decisions, especially if an NPI is also ineffective.

"Sweden did not close primary schools in 2020 as of this writing."
11/ "While we find no evidence of benefits for mrNPIs, the underlying data/methods still have important limitations."

* Cross-region comparisons are difficult
* Case counts are a noisy measure of transmission
* The underlying dynamics may be non-linear and contain feedback loops
12/ "We fail to find an additional benefit of stay-at-home orders and business closures above less-restrictive NPIs.

"The data cannot fully exclude the possibility of some benefits. However, even if they exist, they may not match the harms of the more aggressive measures."
13/ The Supporting Information section includes the chart below as well as the code the authors used for their data preparation, analysis, and visualization. (Visit the page below and scroll to the bottom.)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ec…
14/ Here are the authors' qualifications.

This shouldn't matter much: the paper should stand or fall on its own merits.

Phil Tetlock finds that traditional marks of expertise don't predict forecasting accuracy:


Genetic fallacy:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_f…
15/ Related reading:

Effectiveness of three versus six feet of physical distancing for controlling spread of COVID-19 among primary and secondary students and staff
16/ Interview with John Ioannidis

* IFR estimation
* Pandemic models may be overfitted & subject to publication bias
* Paper: Assessing mandatory stay‐at‐home & business closure effects on the spread of COVID‐19
* Politicization and ad-hominem attacks

podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/3-4…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darren 🥚🐣🕊️

Darren 🥚🐣🕊️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReformedTrader

Apr 25
1/ Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game (Michael Lewis)

"Baseball was at the center of a story about the possibilities—and limits—of reason. It showed how an unscientific culture responds (or fails to respond) to the scientific method." (p. xiv)

amazon.com/Moneyball-Art-…Image
2/ "A small group of undervalued professional players & executives, many of whom had been rejected as unfit for the big leagues, turned themselves into one of the most successful franchises.

"How did one of the poorest teams, the Oakland Athletics, win so many games?" (p. xi)
3/ "Hitting statistics were abundant & had, for James, the powers of language. They were, in his Teutonic coinage, 'imagenumbers.' Literary material. When you read them, they called to mind pictures. He wrote... 'To get 191 hits in a season demands (or seems to) a consistency...
Read 6 tweets
Feb 4
New papers: February 2025
(I haven't read these, but the abstracts look interesting.)

Does Trend-Following Still Work on Stocks?
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Application of the Kelly Criterion to Prediction Markets
semanticscholar.org/paper/Applicat…

Jan 2025 edition:
x.com/ReformedTrader…
December Effect in Option Returns
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Unintended Consequences of Rebalancing
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Speculate against Speculative Demand
semanticscholar.org/paper/Speculat…

Seasonality Patterns in the Crisis Hedge Portfolios (Quantpedia)
quantpedia.com/seasonality-pa…
Bank Fragility After Mergers
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Mutual Fund Investors and the Economic Cost of Seeking Alpha
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

Stock split signaling: Evidence from short interest
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Read 15 tweets
May 18, 2024
1/ Skewness and kurtosis

* Everything has excess kurtosis
* Unlike market returns, individual stocks aren't negatively skewed
* Option prices underestimate kurtosis and overestimate negative skewness
* Implied moments don't consistently predict stock returns
* Sell options?? Image
2/ Asset classes have fat tails, and most have negative skewness.

Kurtosis & expected returns


Kurtosis-Based vs Volatility-Based Asset Allocation


Impact of Skewness and Fat Tails on Asset Allocation

.



Image
Image
3/ This has practical consequences, and it's a good idea to be prepared.

Give me a moment: Optimal leverage in the presence of volatility, skewness, and kurtosis


When Genius Failed: The Rise & Fall of Long-Term Capital Management


Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 1, 2024
1/ Fact, Fiction, and Factor Investing (Aghassi, Asness, Fattouche, Moskowitz)

"We reference an extensive academic literature and perform simple but powerful analyses to address claims about factor investing."

aqr.com/Insights/Resea…
Image
2/ #1. Fiction: Factors are Data-Mined with No Good Economic Story

"Value, momentum, carry, and defensive/quality pass the more stringent statistical tests.

"Many of the factor tests conducted in papers are on variations of a few central themes."




Image
Image
3/ "Value, momentum & defensive/quality applied to US individual stocks has a t-stat of 10.8. Data mining would take nearly a trillion random trials to find this.

"Applying those factors (+carry) across markets and asset classes gets a t-stat of >14."





Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Dec 31, 2023
1/ Happily Ever After? Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Happiness in Germany (Zimmermann, Easterlin)

"The formation of unions (separation or divorce) has a positive (negative) effect on life satisfaction. We also see a 'honeymoon period' effect."

researchgate.net/publication/49…
Image
2/ "The model's four terms describe different life stages for an individual who marries during the sample period. The intercept reflects the average life satisfaction of individuals in the baseline period [all noncohabiting years that are at least one year before marriage]."


Image
Image
Image
Image
3/ " 'How satisfied are you with your life, all things considered?' Responses are ranked on a scale from 0 (completely dissatisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied).

"We center life satisfaction scores around the annual mean of each population subsample in the original population."
Image
Image
Read 29 tweets
Aug 13, 2023
1/ Short-sightedness, rates moves and a potential boost for value (Hanauer, Baltussen, Blitz, Schneider)

* Value spread remains wide
* Relationship between value and rates is not structural
* Extrapolative growth forecasts drive the value premium

robeco.com/en-int/insight…
Image
2/ "The valuation gap between cheap and expensive stocks remains extremely wide. This signals the potential for attractive returns going forward."


Image
Image
Image
Image
3/ "We observe a robust negative relationship between value returns and changes in the value spread.

"The intercept of ≈10% can be interpreted as a cleaner estimate of the value premium, given that it is purged of the time-varying effects of multiple expansions & compressions." Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(