कौण्ड भट्ट Profile picture
Apr 10, 2021 25 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Entire Sadhguru Blasphemous Links compiled.
1.
Proudly Admits he never read Gita Upanishads Vedas not even Yogasutras.

2.
Says he read no scripture but authoritatively speaking on scriptures,
says there is no concept of 1 God here only multiple divine entities. Calls those entities as "tools". Says Gods are our making. No 1 God who controls everything. Reality is Rigved calls him 1, who is called by names Shiva Indra Brahma etc.
3. Compares rama to jesus

(Weather they exist or not, we dont know, we are not a historian. you just need an icon. Krishna did not exist, Jesus did not exist what does it matter to you). Rama is a man we should learn from, and so was Jesus. So Ram=Yeshu.
4. Self doesnt exist - Anaatmavaada. (No hindu sect has anaatmavada)

Says that we can never say God exists or no because we can't see him, but is very sure that the Aatma, the Self doesn't exist.
Agnosticism and Skepticism in God, complete surely Negation in Self. And comlete acceptance in physically unknowable stuff like Chakras Kundalini Koshas and Yantras he sells. +
5. Shiva = Shunya (and another Adiyogi who became Shunya by realising Shunya).

He says God can't be known through any proofs like observation, inference etc but he has a Buddhist concept of Shunyata (vast emptiness) which also cant be known through ...tbc
senses, cant be inferred but that Emptiness, Nothingness is Shi-va. This is Buddhist concept of Shunyata, the one who realizes Shunyata also is Buddha. He has replaced Buddha with Shiva. Also calls a Dog Shiva,
because he is also eventually Shunya (now replaced by Shiva). This is not our Concept as Gita 2.16 says "there is no absence of Satya, absolute existence and no presence of Asat, absolute inexistence".
6. Asking 2 questions collapses all Religions

Here he says if you ask questions you'll automatically become an Atheist, then will turn you Agnostic. So he doesn't want you to believe in God, ....+
but wants you to be Spiritual and believe in Experimentally Unprovable Koshas Chakras etc because he wants to sell Yoga.
7. Hindu Heaven will collapse

Here he asks a question, if body is burnt here then without a body what will you do of good food in Hindu Heaven? He has not read scriptures, so the Sukshma body will go to Heaven, Does he not know this?
He knows this but is hiding, as in another video he himself is talking about 5 Koshas. He knows but is hiding to divert Hindus from Hinduism. 8. 5 Koshas or 5 layers of Body

He admits physical body differs from non-physical ones. +
If he knows this, why did he question the Hindu Heaven? This means he has not read scriptures traditionally (means under a guru), but he has done self-study which he is hiding, and uses his half-hazard knowledge when he wants to show-off.
Or deliberately misguide people. He hides information, or misrepresents information as and when he wishes. He boasts of not reading scriptures and still speaks abt them to show-off that he gets evrtything through self-experience. But then he should be accurate in history, why +
Why did he spread the Aryan Dravidian divide game? If he has divine vision, he should have known that Rigvedi Rishis had 1 concept of Antaryami Purusha controlling everything, and 1 entity manifesting into all divinity. Why he denies idea of 1 God? ...+
9.
Consciously avoided Sanskrit because he doesn't want to clutter himself with scriptural teachings, because that will disrupt his spiritual process.

10.
Knows no Sanskrit bt defines Purushottama where Purusha means Man. Rama=Man
11.
Teaches his own experiences of 3 births, shiva is shunya, Gods are tools and our making etc. to clutter minds of other ppl? If he didn't learn Sanskrit so that his spiritual experience isn't disturbed,
why is he sharing his experience and fake stories to clutter other's mind and disturb their spiritual journey? He himself never wanted to learn anything and clutter himself through scriptures (divine experience of Rishis) bt he clutters his followers with his experiences. Why? +
Dont think he's doing any unity work in south. He is saying Vyasa had Aryan father Dravidian mother and in South, they didn't ascribe to the Vedas. This also is not historically factual, Sanskrit inscriptions of Chola kings and all literature is full vedic. Why dividing Himdus? Image
13. More Blasphemy
Says milk honey poured on linga because stone will crack. By this he is reducing the divine worship to just maintainance of stone. Also, two thousand year old stone temples stand unaffected through storms & calamities& they're Stones.+
14. Blasphemy Continues = Krishna never returned to Radha after he left. Never played flute.
but proofs are there in Harivamsha, Brahmavaivarta etc. Aadiyogi came 15k years ago are alos baseless claims. Shiva is Satya not Shunya, and He is Eternal. ....+
15. Blasphemy on Parashurama and Dattatreya
16. Blasphemy on Shankaracharya

Shankara in his Bhashya clearly mentions Surapan (drinking liquor) is greatest sin for a Brahman MAHAPATAK, if he drinks he immideately falls down. He is spreading misinformation on Shankaracharya that he drank liquor. +
17. Promoting Aryan Dravidian Divide
Basically he says don't read scriptures. Here take my books. Listen to my experience and my buddhist theories. Dont follow astrology.But here buy this Yantra from my site. He is removing faith of believers, by claiming fake history. Only den ppl will believe his buddhist stuff |

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with कौण्ड भट्ट

कौण्ड भट्ट Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kaundabhatta

Jan 10
Let us again delve into this interesting topic that apparently (appears to be) is about considering Jagat as illusionary, but that is not the intention of Gosvamiji.

Let's look at the conclusion he makes first. Balakanda Doha 118 Chaupai 3 - Rama is verily that Supreme Being. +
O Bhavani, any kind of illusion in Rama is impossible. If you say so, your words are non-coherent with the prescribed opinion of the Vedas. When such a doubt arises in your mind (that Rama is influenced by Maya), all wisdom, penance and austerities are lost. Now let's look +
at the beginning. Doha 111 - झूटेउ सत्य जाहि बिनु जाने। जिमि भुजंग बिनु रजु पहिचाने। जेहि जाने जग जाई हेराई। जागे जथा सपन भ्रम जाहिं॥
One must note that the doubt of Uma, was about the nature of Lord Rama and Shankara has in this entire episode time and again showed +
Read 21 tweets
Sep 6, 2022
पृथिवी को अचला के साथ साथ पुराणों और कोषों में "जगती" भी कहा गया है। गच्छतीति जगत् सा एव जगती। जो पृथिवी का पृथिवीत्व है वह स्थूल होने से है और उसी कारण उसे अचला कहा गया है। आर्यभट अवैदिक नहीं थे। वे भी वेदों में श्रद्धा रखने वाले आचार्य थे और अन्य स्थिरत्ववादी भी। +
इसमें मैं अपना मत रखूँगा। मैं भागवत को सर्वाधिक प्रमाण मानता हूँ और भागवत के अनुसार सूर्य न केवल पृथिवी की अपितु तीन लोकों की परिक्रमा लगाते हैं रथारूढ़ होकर। भागवत में पृथिवी आदि तीन लोक स्थिर हैं भूः भुवः सुवः और साथ ही चपटे हैं मण्डलाकार गोल जिनकी सूर्य रथमें चकल लगते हैं। +
भागवत अबाध्य शास्त्र है। लेकिन पृथ्वी को गोल भी कहा गया है। तो निष्कर्ष बड़ा सरल है, कि भागवत आदि अधिदैव को ध्यान में रखकर कहे गए शास्त्र हैं। अधिभूत में प्रत्यक्ष अनुमान को ही देख लेना चाहिए। क्योंकि भागवतादि जो सिद्ध है लौकिक प्रमाणों से उसीको पुनः नहीं दोहराएंगे। +
Read 12 tweets
Nov 30, 2021
Now comes the 2nd part = proving same Varnashrama as Puranas from Rigveda.but before that i am unable to understand the exact stance of Mr @Koenraad_Elst sir please clarify what is your stance, did casteist ppl interpolate the Shambuka episode, or it is determined due to solar
prince? Lets assume as you said Rama was a solar prince, how does that make Shambuka episode an addition? What is the relation? Also your assumption is incorrect because any "rational" being cannot assume this "rationally" as Ramayana is an Epic, not a scientific journal that you
make rational assumptions on Rama's lineage, character, or being human/god. Epics in Greece were based on some Hero with superhuman abilities and a race connected to some God perhaps. Hindu Epics are based on Dharma not Heroism. Krishna wasn't a typical Greek Hero,+
Read 25 tweets
Nov 29, 2021
An Extremely important thread. Few days ago, @Koenraad_Elst ji had claimed that the story of Shambuka was not in the Ramayana previously but later added by people of casteist mindset. This claim shall now be critically analysed.
Before I start, I would like to clarify in the beginning that social hierarchy is not the purpose of Varnashrama, that is secondary. Primary function is to perform the Vaidika Yajnas, hierarchy in social status is necessary for any Society to function. But such status is flexible
The Varna remains the same, but based on one's role in society the status may differ. The hereditary jobs can be changed in few cases, andeven though that happens it does not change your Varna but only the social status. Heirarchy is important. Every system has hierarchy. +
Read 21 tweets
Sep 6, 2021
Again random cherrypicking and claiming interpolation, there is no basis to his claims. First claim is incorrect, that both had reached youthb y age just because he found समुपस्थितयौवनौ. Maricha says Rama is 12 years and has not yet got any beard and is still a kid. +
बालो द्वादशवर्षो ऽयमकृतास्त्रश्च राघवः ।
।। 3.38.6 ।।

अजातव्यञ्जनः श्रीमान् पद्मपत्रनिभेक्षणः ।
।। 3.38.14 ।।
अजातव्यञ्जनः अनुत्पन्नयौवनलक्षणः - Govindaraja

First word is बाल = kid, now here even the age is mentioned 12 years, dvadasha varsha = 12 years age.
ajaata-vyanjana means he had no signs of puberty, that could express (vyanjana) his youth, no beard no mustache and was a kid yet. Dasharatha also expresses grief to Vishvamitra saying बालो ह्यकृतविद्यश्च = he is yet a kid and hasnt learnt any astravidya.
Read 11 tweets
Jun 7, 2021
@tishya_saran this comes from lacknof understanding anything abt hinduism. Hinduism says absolute freedom is a myth while abrahms say free will, there is nobody out of the boundary of Dharma and you have no right to choose what you want. Morality based on choice leads to hedonism
If such is your imagination of hinduism leave it alone. Just speak as an atheist against hindu hatred and expose hypocrisy of the left. Manu Smriti is sanctioned in Ramayana Mahabharata Jaimini Sutras Apastamba Sutras and also directly in Vedasn"यद्वै...भेषजम्". +
Even Bhagavan when takes an Avatara becomes adherent to Dharma, the Buddha who criticised Dharma is not worshipped by any Hindu hence ane Buddhists are not peaceful ppl. This myth also can he busted by reading history of Buddhist violence and expansionism. +
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(