Remember the time the Daily Mail ran an Assange smear featuring a photo of a clean bathroom and a dish he was actively using titled "ASSANGE INSIDE HIS FETID LAIR: REVEALED, THE FULL SQUALID HORROR THAT DROVE THE EMBASSY STAFF TO FINALLY KICK HIM OUT"? dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6…
It just shows so much about the power of narrative. They took a picture of a COMPLETELY CLEAN BATHROOM and a plate he was LITERALLY PRESENTLY EATING OFF OF, and because they captioned it with "SQUALID HORROR" and "FETID LAIR" people actually believed it showed evidence of that.
Just click this link and scroll through all the people sharing the Daily Mail article on Twitter as though it shows evidence of Assange being a bad houseguest at the embassy: twitter.com/search?q=https…
A clean bathroom. And a dish he was currently using. They're basically going "Look at Julian Assange. He EATS and POOPS. Isn't that DISGUSTING?? Have you ever thought about how DISGUSTING that is???"
And people bought it. They swallowed it hook, line and sinker. I had people in my mentions sharing that article at me like "Hurr hurr, looks like your guy is a bit of a disgusting pig." And it just showed normal living behavior, overlaid with narrative spin. That's all it was.
I love how they posted photos of normal stuff as evidence that he was smearing feces on the walls and leaving dirty underwear all over the embassy, like there wouldn't have been photos of that if it had actually happened. People are so very, very gullible.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Concerns are mounting from bipartisan US lawmakers and Afghan women's rights activists that the hard-won gains for women and civil society in Afghanistan could be lost if the United States makes a precipitous withdrawal from the country," CNN tells us.
What follows is yet another concern-trolling empire blog about why US troops need to stay in Afghanistan, joining recent others geared toward the same end like this CNN report saying the US can't withdraw or it will be sued by defense contractors:
Aspire to greatness,
but not the kind they teach you about in school.
Not the kind where you can all be astronauts and presidents when you grow up
so long as you "apply yourself" (whatever that means)
and other such nonsense.
Aspire to greatness,
but not the kind they teach you about in church.
Reducing US Military Spending Always Meets With Resistance; Increasing It Never Does
"A political establishment which thinks it's sane and moderate to increase a morbidly obese military budget is a crazy and extremist political establishment. " caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/reducing-us-…
Last year Senator Bernie Sanders led a public push to reduce the insanely bloated US military budget by a paltry ten percent. His push splatted headfirst against a bipartisan solid steel wall which shut him down definitively. theguardian.com/world/commenti…
Sanders' bill was killed in the Senate by a vote of 23 - 77, with half of Senate Dems stepping up to help Republicans stomp it dead. It's companion bill in the House was killed by a margin of 93 - 324, with a majority of House Dems (92 - 139) voting nay. defensenews.com/congress/2020/…
When the empire wants to topple a government their first step is to psychologically uncouple it from the nation and its people by consistently using labels that make it look like an alien, occupying force. "The CCP", "the Assad regime", instead of just that country's government.
This is why you now hear so many indoctrinated automatons constantly bleating the mantra "I don't hate the Chinese PEOPLE, I hate the CCP!" They've been trained to uncouple the nation's people from its government, despite the overwhelming support they have for their government.
This is all the alien-sounding word "regime" exists to do: to uncouple a government from its nation and its people in the eyes of the world. And the mainstream press is happy to do this, because the mainstream press is propaganda. fair.org/home/a-regime-…
Most people get that the US is imperialist per the conventional definition: projecting power beyond its borders etc. Not enough people get that it's also functionally a literal empire: the hub of a group of nations ruled by a single power structure. It's imperialist AND imperial.
Empire building is what you're seeing when coups are staged and regime change wars launched to bring a nation into alignment with the US-centralized power structure. It's literally adding a new member state to the empire. It keeps its name and flag, but it's imperial property.
When people ask why I talk about "Australia" instead of "America", it makes as much sense to me as saying you should focus on California instead of America. It's a member state of the same empire, added via coup. I just focus on the empire's head. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
This is a really really common complaint from lefty commentators @jack@TwitterSupport. Why are so many of them getting notifications flooding in for new followers, but their follower account stays the same? Happens to me too off and on for days on end.