Here is a nice verification exercise. @DrIsaPantami
the Nigerian communication minister is reported to be on a US watchlist and is trending in Nigeria. Is this a rumor or truth? Start with this article: niyitabiti.net/2021/04/us-pla…
Explain why you think this is correct or not (2/..)
Try to work two ways: can you find the original source (patient zero) who said it first? And can you find stuff from US gov that supports the claim? (3/3)
First, let's see if the US GOV is talking about the person. If we would use his own profile data, nothing happens (5/..)
But that is normal. I use 10 different ways of finding a name, here is how. So we should go for variations in the name, right ? (6/...)
The name the CIA used, is Ali Isa PANTAMI. He is listed in a document that is updated in 2019. This is a list (capitals by CIA) of CHIEFS OF STATE/ CABINET MEMBERS/ FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS. Not a watch list.. (7/...)
When your done checking all the name variations, you can see that there are no US gov sites that put our subject on a watch list. So let's go to the original Nigerian source now (7/...)
Go to my whopostedwhat.com and check the billions of Facebook posting on ""Ibrahim" "watch list" and go back in time till you don't see the news anymore. The "patient 0" date on Facebook is April 11. (8/...)
Here you have some postings (mobile users: login into FB needed) facebook.com/search/posts/?… As you can see, there is no source. The minister is "said to be" a very close confidant to the assassinated leader of Boko Haram (9/...)
The lead reads:
There is disquiet in the land at the weekend following an allegation that the Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Alhaji Isa Ali Ibrahim, also known as Sheikh Pantami, has fallen on the watch list of the America’s Intelligence Service. (11/...)
Who is the source? Oops, it's a major newspaper in Nigeria. The Independent is a successor to the Diet newspaper established in 1997 by James Ibori, a close friend of the military ruler General Sani Abacha (says Wiki) (12/...)
But IS this the original source? Go back with Google --~>Tools and you will see. No. There was an earlier source. Check
Now check newswirengr.com manually. Oops.. unreachable, at the time of writing. You can see in the snippet of Google they regret what they said: (14/...)
And there you have it: it was a hoax that the guy was on a US list (maybe the other facts are true, but he is not a public gov list). Meanwhile in Nigeria, the story rose from #3 to #2 on the trending list (15/15) (End)
It's official. Hey newswire from Nigeria, next time just apply some basic #osint skills : ) (16/..)
For some odd reason, this thread doesn't continue in every browser. Please follow the rest here:
Introducing the first public version of a versatile, still experimental tool for image detection. What can you do with it? It's aimed at reporters, writers and investigators. (1/6) Detectai.Live
Upload a picture and get web links, when found. Nice feature is that it will also detect public faces, something that Google doesn't do that well anymore. We run Google Vision under the hood for this, with Vertrext (2/6)
If the picture could be fake (= ai generated) then you will get after 15 seconds a verdict that helps you to judge it. If we find links, we want you to have a look yourself. If not, it will try to give a verdict in a percentage, and explain why. (3/6)
ChatGPT quietly scrubbed today nearly 50,000 shared conversations from Google's index after our investigation. They thought they'd solved the problem. They were wrong. (1/5)
A new Digital Digging investigation, conducted with @osint77760, has uncovered 110,000 ChatGPT conversations preserved in 's Wayback Machine—a digital time capsule OpenAI can't touch. (2/5)Archive.org
@osint77760 While OpenAI scrambled to de-index conversations from Google, they forgot the internet's most basic rule—nothing truly disappears. had already captured everything. (3/5)Archive.org
New investigation: when I asked chatbots for something behind a paywall, they delivered the complete story—including quotes that should have been impossible to access without paying. This isn't a bug. It's a feature digitaldigging.org/p/how-ai-bots-…
ChatGPT, Perplexity & Grok systematically access subscriber-only content from major publications—often requiring just 2-5 follow-up questions to extract complete articles. Gemini and Claude are less intrusive. (2/5)
Another finding: @Musk's new Grok 4 (SuperGrok) has paywall-busting direct X integration. It systematically mines social media discussions, screenshots, and quoted excerpts that users share from the paywalled content. (3/5)
I decided to use my lunch time to show you how easy it is to make a fake news story in 30 minutes with Veo3 (I didn't try to perfect it). First: the footage. A mayor comes with a crazy idea and people hate it: (1/10) #verification #ai
What's needed to create this fake uproar in 28 minutes? Access to Google's Veo3. The same AI tool Google promotes for 'creative content' can fabricate creative misinformation. 🧵2/10
The 7-second limit creates a huge challenge: how do you maintain continuity? Solution: Split single interviews across multiple clips, use different camera angles of the same 'event,' create matching audio that bridges scenes. 🧵3/10
Volgograd Oil Refinery is bombarded by Ukraine. Actual footage generated by ….. #AI based on just one picture (2) I gave it and the prompt “add explosions” #verification #geolocation #fakenews via It’s not that easy to detect that this is a fake video (1/2)vidu.studio
Sharpness: The lowest sharpness is 4.76, which is a very low value. This suggests some frames may have been smoothed or blurred, possibly as a result of manipulation or Al generation. Natural textures may have been lost in these frames.
Texture Changes: The variation between the highest (597.85) and lowest (166.14) gradient magnitudes indicates some frames have significantly less texture, further supporting the possibility of manipulation.
In this Twitter storm of 30 tweets, I'll unveil how Google's algorithms operate. Just confirmed: the March 2024 #googleleaks of Google's API docs on GitHub & Hexdocs are real. They reveal Google's tactics in market control, search influence, and data handling, raising privacy and ethical concerns. (1/30)
1. An API called NavBoost uses click data to adjust rankings. Popular results get boosted, distorting relevance for anyone who wants to go deeper. #GoogleLeaks #MarketManipulation
2. Google’s scores image aesthetics to influence search results. Visual appeal can outweigh relevance. #GoogleLeaks