Californians for Equal Rights, the org that led the charge against Prop 16, has filed a complaint with the DoEd against the San Diego School District. They allege that a 10-day mandatory CRT training session last fall violated teachers' civil rights.
This is one group to watch. @wu_wenyuan will have to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe CER has also signed on to a bunch of other lawsuits over alleged anti-Asian bias in university admissions, e.g. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.
CER is part of larger arc of groups working the anti-CRT issue, including FAIR, Southeast Legal Foundation, and Parents Defending Education. All are either currently suing or promising to sue K-12 and higher ed institutions over discriminatory pedagogy and/or training.
Some of the lawsuits sound pretty far-fetched. Others maybe less so. Anyway, it's going to be a major issue over the summer as these complaints and lawsuits get rolled out.
Yeah, a lot CER's complaint is like this. They object to specific facts or how they are presented. It's hard to spin that as a civil rights violation. But other parts allege a hostile workplace or harassment, which obviously are more serious claims.
How do university students, parents, and admissions officers evaluate institutional diversity statements? This PNAS study asked them to read and evaluate an "instrumental" rationale for diversity and a "moral" one. Here they are.
White students/parents preferred the first statement and said they would do best at University A. Black students/parents said the opposite. Admissions officers anticipated these preferences but said that while w std. would do well anywhere, b std. would do best at University B.
Were these expectations right? For white students, the prevalence of instrumental vs. moral rationales for diversity made no difference for grad rates. But for black students, it did. Low use of moral rationales was associated with lower grad rates for black students.
This is your weekly reminder that Campus Reform is a toxic website that engages in the rankest forms of cancel culture. It expends an enormous amount of energy trying to silence liberal profs, and very often succeeds.
It's a cliche about campus politics today that while leftwing attacks on academic freedom tend to come from on campus, rightwing ones come from off campus. But looking at CR's structural model, I'm not so sure that's the case. It's still coming from on campus -- just indirectly.
It makes you wonder. Ten years ago, would the same conservatives students who are now submitting stories to Campus Reform have been, instead, founding student clubs, mobilizing campus protests, etc.?
I see that many people are already responding to this comment with suggestions from the poli sci literature, but I'd be a poor student indeed of @jtlevy if I didn't highlight some work from the epistemic turn in deliberative democracy.
First, Helene Landemore's "Democratic Reason". Rule by a philosopher king might sound nice, but there are all kinds of barriers and drawbacks. Landemore makes the case for inclusive decision-making and majority rule over rule by experts.
I feel like people are finally starting to take the Right's assault on academic freedom. That's very gratifying. If you're a journalist looking to fill some column inches, here are some stories I'd love to see getting more attention:
A North Dakota bill (close now to passage) would prohibit universities that partner with abortion providers from accessing key state grants and would penalize them under a popular funding formula.
The bill is widely understood to be targeting Professor Molly Secor-Turner, a North Dakota State sex ed scholar who uses Planned Parenthood for help distributing her research instruments to members of the community.
I don't really have anything to add to this thread. Despite what they say, it's obvious that legislators would use this survey to inform how they budget decisions, allocating different levels of support to schools or universities based on their politics.
Not to get too snotty about it, but one of the reasons that my own views on campus politics is so different from others working that beat is because my twitter timeline isn't exclusively filled with Lefties Run Amok. It's also filled with things like this.
Can't remember if I've mentioned this before, but I have half a dozen google alerts set up for buzzwords like "professor fired" or "course cancelled". Every day at 10:00am, I get a list of 20-30 incidents. Of those, roughly eighty percent involve allegations of sexual misconduct.
I guess what I'm saying is that depending on where you're sitting or how you get your news, things on campus can look very, very different.