Californians for Equal Rights, the org that led the charge against Prop 16, has filed a complaint with the DoEd against the San Diego School District. They allege that a 10-day mandatory CRT training session last fall violated teachers' civil rights.

cferfoundation.org/wp-content/upl…
This is one group to watch. @wu_wenyuan will have to correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe CER has also signed on to a bunch of other lawsuits over alleged anti-Asian bias in university admissions, e.g. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard.
CER is part of larger arc of groups working the anti-CRT issue, including FAIR, Southeast Legal Foundation, and Parents Defending Education. All are either currently suing or promising to sue K-12 and higher ed institutions over discriminatory pedagogy and/or training.
Some of the lawsuits sound pretty far-fetched. Others maybe less so. Anyway, it's going to be a major issue over the summer as these complaints and lawsuits get rolled out.
Yeah, a lot CER's complaint is like this. They object to specific facts or how they are presented. It's hard to spin that as a civil rights violation. But other parts allege a hostile workplace or harassment, which obviously are more serious claims.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeffrey Sachs

Jeffrey Sachs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeffreyASachs

13 Apr
How do university students, parents, and admissions officers evaluate institutional diversity statements? This PNAS study asked them to read and evaluate an "instrumental" rationale for diversity and a "moral" one. Here they are.

pnas.org/content/118/16… ImageImage
White students/parents preferred the first statement and said they would do best at University A. Black students/parents said the opposite. Admissions officers anticipated these preferences but said that while w std. would do well anywhere, b std. would do best at University B. ImageImage
Were these expectations right? For white students, the prevalence of instrumental vs. moral rationales for diversity made no difference for grad rates. But for black students, it did. Low use of moral rationales was associated with lower grad rates for black students. Image
Read 4 tweets
12 Apr
This is your weekly reminder that Campus Reform is a toxic website that engages in the rankest forms of cancel culture. It expends an enormous amount of energy trying to silence liberal profs, and very often succeeds.

theintercept.com/2021/04/10/cam…
It's a cliche about campus politics today that while leftwing attacks on academic freedom tend to come from on campus, rightwing ones come from off campus. But looking at CR's structural model, I'm not so sure that's the case. It's still coming from on campus -- just indirectly.
It makes you wonder. Ten years ago, would the same conservatives students who are now submitting stories to Campus Reform have been, instead, founding student clubs, mobilizing campus protests, etc.?
Read 4 tweets
8 Apr
I see that many people are already responding to this comment with suggestions from the poli sci literature, but I'd be a poor student indeed of @jtlevy if I didn't highlight some work from the epistemic turn in deliberative democracy.
First, Helene Landemore's "Democratic Reason". Rule by a philosopher king might sound nice, but there are all kinds of barriers and drawbacks. Landemore makes the case for inclusive decision-making and majority rule over rule by experts.

press.princeton.edu/books/paperbac…
If you don't want to get the book, this working paper more or less sums up the argument.

researchgate.net/profile/Helene…

She's also been interviewed by @ezraklein

nytimes.com/2021/02/23/opi…

and profiled in the New Yorker
newyorker.com/news/the-futur…
Read 7 tweets
7 Apr
I feel like people are finally starting to take the Right's assault on academic freedom. That's very gratifying. If you're a journalist looking to fill some column inches, here are some stories I'd love to see getting more attention:
A North Dakota bill (close now to passage) would prohibit universities that partner with abortion providers from accessing key state grants and would penalize them under a popular funding formula.

insidehighered.com/news/2021/04/0…
The bill is widely understood to be targeting Professor Molly Secor-Turner, a North Dakota State sex ed scholar who uses Planned Parenthood for help distributing her research instruments to members of the community.
Read 12 tweets
7 Apr
I don't really have anything to add to this thread. Despite what they say, it's obvious that legislators would use this survey to inform how they budget decisions, allocating different levels of support to schools or universities based on their politics.
There's a similar bill in Iowa. The sponsor is admirably straightforward about how he envisions it being used.

kcci.com/article/iowa-b…
Seems bad!
Read 5 tweets
6 Apr
Not to get too snotty about it, but one of the reasons that my own views on campus politics is so different from others working that beat is because my twitter timeline isn't exclusively filled with Lefties Run Amok. It's also filled with things like this.
Can't remember if I've mentioned this before, but I have half a dozen google alerts set up for buzzwords like "professor fired" or "course cancelled". Every day at 10:00am, I get a list of 20-30 incidents. Of those, roughly eighty percent involve allegations of sexual misconduct.
I guess what I'm saying is that depending on where you're sitting or how you get your news, things on campus can look very, very different.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!