Wall Street Journal today: “America’s chaotic pandemic response, followed by a summer of racial upheaval and the Jan. 6 Capitol storming, solidified [Xi's] faith in the Chinese system’s superiority.”
No one thinks this will ever end.
I think that professor who was encouraging recreational heroin use might be on to something.
Let’s see what the Democratic Party is up to. “No more policing” says my fellow Palestinian.
The pro-intervention crowd is not happy about Biden's coming announcement on Afghanistan. Here's The Washington Post alone. Thread.
Congrats to al-Qaida and the IRGC! I care more about if FDD wins, and they're on quite the losing streak.
But women! Why are women always a justification to keep a war going but never to start one? They draw you in with talk of scary threats, keep you in through feminist guilt.
The anti-Nate Silver Fauci worshippers are scarier than Antifa, Islamists, and Capitol Hill rioters put together. The combination of stupidity and certainty with which they go through life, all the more horrifying because it's empty of any ideology but deference to power.
Always 5D chess! Instead of believing pulling a vaccine will make people doubt its efficacy, they think people will say
1) Gee, 1 in a million is not that high 2) But they stopped it anyway, and made an irrational decision 3) Wow, they must really know what they're doing!
These arguments are always just post hoc used to justify whatever the FDA or CDC did. Nobody made this argument last week as far as I can tell. These people's brains have something very very wrong with them.
Does the left ever engage the right on the question of democracy or just assume more is better? Maybe they should defend the concept using data showing how informed and intelligent voters are.
"Killing with drones produces queer moments of disorientation. Drawing on queer phenomenology, I show how militarized masculinities function as spatiotemporal landmarks that give killing in war its 'orientation'." Award winning research. tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Also an expert in "Petro-Masculinity." Must stand up to the "king of petro-masculinity," Charles Koch, and shirtless Putin swinging his oil barrels around making solar energy look gay.
Petro-masculinity "appreciates the historic role of fossil fuel systems in buttressing white patriarchal rule." "Petro masculinists" see the earth as feminine, punish her with "fossil violence". Proud Boys don't masturbate, which is also petro-masculinity. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11…
I like how the journalist for USA Today set out to stop Americans from being able to pay for lawyers, and the defense of the media is "shame on @ggreenwald, we don't actually pay her to do this!"
Is it better that the commissars works for free?
You might notice a common theme in her work. There are a lot of opportunities out there for young reporters who have no idea what they're talking about as long as they say the right things, one day they might pay her for this stuff.
Flashback: In 2010, Liz Cheney attacked lawyers for defending Guantanamo detainees. Right, left and center denounced her for it. Shouldn't underestimate the degree to which the press and the left have become illiberal. nytimes.com/2010/03/10/us/…
When I went into academia, I thought there was a tradeoff between having a lucrative career, on the one hand, and an interest in truth and influence, on the other. I came to realize there is no tradeoff, academia is worse across the board. I encourage everyone to avoid it.
You have more intellectual freedom writing for think tanks and newspapers than for academic journals. Academics are told what authorities to cite and which methodology to use, and that's on top of the pressure to reach certain conclusions, which are found everywhere, and more PC.
During my PhD, I did work on public opinion and used stats to understand international relations. I came to the conclusion public opinion doesn’t matter in IR, and the statistical methods are mistakenly applied. Only way to keep publishing would have been to pretend otherwise.