Did Immanuel Kant(1724-1804) study/steal Indic philosophy?

-Distinct similarities with Chandrakirti(600 CE)
-His "categorical imperative" is niṣkāmakarma
-Vedic 'maya' & Kant's 'thing in itself'
-According to Hermann Jacobi(b 1850), Kant's 'Aesthetics' relies on Hindu treatises
-Kant talked of Indian culture in his lecture at königsberg university
-Helmuth Von Glasenapp's book 'Kant and religions of the east' has Indic religious passages from Kant's writings that no one knew of.
-His student Johann Fichte(1762-1814)published a book influenced by Advaita
What is the use of a philosopher who talks of high ethics if he practices none of it?
Even in India, philosophy courses are biased towards western systems, forcing students to learn Kant while not enabling and allowing them to make the causal connection with India. I haven't seen anyone challenging this absurd curriculum in India. Systematic mind colonization.
The only western(especially German) Philosopher I can respect and will read is Schopenhauer(1788-1860). He is the only one who 'categorically' admitted his inspiration-

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joseph T Noony

Joseph T Noony Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoeAgneya

12 Apr
"Portuguese, Dutch and English have been, year after year, shipping home treasures of India in their big vessels. We Germans have been left to watch it. Schlegel, Bopp, Humboldt etc are our East Indian sailors. Bonn and Munich(Universities) will be good factories"
-Georg Brandes
The west is drunk with a false notion that their 17th century philosophical explosion is an independent achievement. A neurotic & successful self-deception. But the truth is, from Kant to Nietzsche, Vedic-Buddhist philosophy and logic was ripped to shreds to make it happen.
Which is fine. Its wisdom after all. Take & share. Just as the Rishis and Bodhisattvas intended. But to drain the mind of a civilization for centuries, even as you colonize it into ruin, deny the intellectual debts while corrupting every page of its history with racist garbage...
Read 4 tweets
31 Dec 20
History of the Solar Year

Celestial wheel turns in 360 days
Dirgatamas~2600BCE

True year is between 365 & 366
Yajur,2400BCE

366 for civil use!
Lagadha,1370 BCE

Correction month in 2.5 yrs!
Kautilya,300BC

365.2588
Surya Sid-200CE

365.2585
Aryabhata

Modern sidereal-365.25636
1560-Christopher Clavius sends several Jesuits to Kerala to learn Jyotisha, accurate trignometric tables etc

1582-Gregorian calendar adopted with Indian Ahargana system('Julian numbers'); 11 October days dropped

1752-British empire adopts Gregorian

1956-India adopts Gregorian
Aryabhata's value is off by just 3mins 20sec. The true solar year is the sidereal, not the Tropical one which the Gregorian continues to use, along with many unscientific & arbitrary absurdities such as '28' Feb days.

'Jan 1' has no significance whatsoever. Well, Happy new year!
Read 4 tweets
29 Dec 20
Here are reasons for inadmissibility of 'Subtrate' arguments-
1. Many(including Lubotsky) themselves admit that they are arbitrarily using the word 'Substrate' as against 'adstrate'. This invalidates any attempt to use it as evidence of AIT.
From Talageri- Image
2. The vast majority of words tortured up- and all of so called BMAC words- are either late or post Rig Vedic

3. If these adstrates are proof of AIT, then the HUGE Semitic, old European and Uralic loans in western branches which are ABSENT in Indo-Iranian & Tocharian proves OIT Image
4. It is known that Austroasiatic/Munda immigrated into India after~4000BP. Irrelevant to OIT. Witzel's 'Para Munda' falls flat.

5. Isidone Dyen has demonstrated co-development between PIE and Proto-Austronesian. This is possible ONLY in OIT scenario.
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Read 6 tweets
22 Dec 20
What did Daniel Bernouli(1700-1782 CE) plagiarize from Narayana Pandit(1340-1400 CE) indirectly through Jesuit translations of Kerala manuscripts?

#NationalMathematicsDay
What did 17th century European Mathematicians plagiarize from Bhaskara the IInd(1114-1185 CE)?
#NationalMathematicsDay

What did 17th century Europe plagiarize from Madhava of Sangamagrama(1340-1425 CE) ?
#NationalMathematicsDay
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct 20
The Govt should commission a new Purana in Sanskrit. It should cover the entire recorded history of the civilization state of Bharatam in the native perspective. From the spread of Indo-European tribes from Sapta Sindhu(3500-2000 BCE) to the 1st war of Independence in 1857 CE.
It should then be translated to every vernacular. The Puranas are the world's oldest historical tradition originally created by 100s of Vedic era court bards/Pauranikas. There is no need for us to blindly follow the colonial methods of histography whose pollution must be removed.
Purana writing continued even till modern times. True, lots of ahistorical stories, mythology, exaggerations & chronological errors have crept into the major puranas over the last 3500 years. These shortcomings must be corrected while we extract history from original Vedic texts.
Read 5 tweets
23 Sep 20
"The first cause was a self aware singularity.The truth is ∞"
Yajnavalkya, 2000 BCE

"There is nothing permanent. Not even the self. The truth is 0"
Buddha, 500 BCE

"Truth is multifaceted. Both 0 & ∞"
Mahavira, 500 BCE

"Mathematically I found that 0=1/∞"
Bhaskara II, 1150 CE
This is why Europe would never have discovered zero and calculus on its own even after a thousand years. They simply did not have the phisosophical foundation for it. They did it the easy way- mass plagiarism of Indian hard work.
This is also why Indic darsanas(Vedic, Jain and Buddhist) should not be treated as 'religions'. They are not a bunch of dogmas at eternal conflict with each other like middle Eastern faiths. They are high philosophies that directly inspired modern mathematics.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!