Thread by @gianlucac1

ON THE GBD AGAIN: THE LAST ZIG ZAG 3d
sorry to come back again

The last zig zag of the GBD pundits is

"GBD is like the current vaccination campaign which is infact aimed at protecting those at risk first. No difference netween vaccinations and the aims of GBD."

REALLY?
1/n

the GBD is essentially composed by 2 statements which are not possible to unscramble

GBD="Protect those at risk+increase Virus circulation in others to reach HIT "

plus some others explanatory statements in the FAQ: like TTT is useless for SarsCov2, to name one
2/n

many people debunked the GBD.

i did some 3d too on the mathematical side

here in italian

https://twitter.com/gianlucac1/status/1317057667098202113?s=20

here there is a modelling (not mine) medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

spoiler: GBD does not pass the binomial test

3/n

Now what is really INCREDIBLE is that those pundits which are saying that the aim of GBD and of the vaccination campaign is the same, when doing so

ARE COMPLETELY FORGETTING THE SECOND PART OF THE STATEMENTS THEY HAVE SIGNED

"Let the virus rip"

4/n

Has anyone seen a

"vaccinations 24/7+let the virus rip"

campaign by any public health authority in the world?

i didnt

So....

any negationism is normally composed by credible statements which we normally agree with (shield those at risk)
5/n

with some other statements
(aka let the virus rip to reach Hit)
which are
1) not credible/scientific
2) incoherent with the other statements
3) or 1+2

6/n

So when comparing Vaccines and GBD, those pundits are simply RIGHT CENSORING the GBD
(alt-right censoring?) and make the umpteenth zig zag
My question is:

WHEN DO THEY STOP?
7/7

@ThManfredi @mtizzoni @Di_SPACE_Lauro @AurelianoStingi @Doom3Gloom

cc @CT_Bergstrom

@ikashnitsky @GidMK @AtomsksSanakan