Dr. Faust Profile picture
13 Apr, 5 tweets, 1 min read
I'm 40 and female - I would have happily taken JNJ and AZ vaccines if offered. The math on this is not hard.

1 in a million chance of a clotting disorder post-vax for JNJ. 4 in a million chance for AZ.

225 in a million chance of death from covid for my age group.
The issue here is how serious do we think covid actually is. Is it serious enough to close down the world, destroy entire economic sectors, induce increase in mental health disorders, addiction, violence, and social unrest?
Is it serious enough to stop cancer screenings, preventative healthcare, schooling, and physical activity?
We've certainly claimed that it is - we've used covid deaths and post-viral syndrome to claim that all these social and individual costs are justified.
But now, faced with a rare outcome of 1 in a million, we're messaging that rolling your dice with covid is preferable?
People are not stupid. We don't get to have it both ways, folks.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Faust

Dr. Faust Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @azfaust

15 Apr
Let's pretend that there is no pandemic and we can all focus on our work. Let's do a thread on writing NSF grants.
I learned to write NIH grants first, so I came to NSF writing from an entirely NIH perspective. In some ways, that was helpful but I also had to unlearn some bad habits. I'll share my experience - but please feel free to chime in.
There are 2 required sections of an NSF grant: Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts. Intellectual merit is where you put all the science-y stuff: background, prelim data, research approach.
Read 26 tweets
16 Dec 19
Let's talk a bit about graphical abstracts.
What is a graphical abstract? I call it a visual hypothesis or in essence, the model that will be tested in a grant. It can also represent the workflow or how smaller components fit into the big picture.
Elsevier defines it as: "a single, concise, pictorial and visual summary of the main findings of the article. ...captures the content of the article for readers at a single glance."

Now for grants, turn the finding to what it would look like if your hypothesis was correct.
Read 17 tweets
8 Nov 19
Overly Honest Grant Writing Workshop

(feel free to add)
Slide 1: Who is the audience for this workshop? Those pitiful peons from non-ivy schools. For the purposes of this presentation, Stanford and UCSF are considered Ivy League.
Slide 2: Read the funding opportunity announcement. 75% of your problems will be gone if you read the funding opportunity announcement. 90% of you still won’t do it.
Read 21 tweets
1 Nov 19
These morning email shenanigans reminded me to talk about writing big grants. So I have some unpopular opinions about big grants:
1) It's still a one-person led grant. The main PI has to be on board and fully behind whatever is being done. The rest of the team is replaceable. If you are not a PI on the big grant, it's best to remember that.
2) A big grant is the proof that too many chefs in the kitchen is bad. Know your place. If you don't agree with the direction or what will be done, take yourself out of the project.
Read 13 tweets
7 Oct 19
The world is on fire and the R01 deadline just passed so it's the perfect time to talk research strategy for an R01 application...
First, a disclaimer: this is how I do it. I have a PhD, I worked as a scientific writer for a while, and have been drafting grants for a decade. This is what works for me (most of the time). It's not an iron-clad rule of how it should be done. Feel free to ignore. Now...
First I pull up my Specific Aims page. Likely, it has been chewed over, torn apart, and stitched together. I am happy with it. Most importantly, the PI is happy with it. It's ready.
Read 35 tweets
25 Apr 19
Since starting to work with NSF grants a few years ago, after coming in with years of NIH experience, I am constantly comparing and contrasting the two agencies.
One of the first things that stood out to me with NSF is that the POs are often rotating - meaning most are not professional POs like at NIH and instead are academics on "loan" from their home institution.
NSF does have professional POs but they usually manage the entire division/directorate and deal little with general review minutiae.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!