OKAY, #MAEdu, we've got the House FY22 Ways and Means budget coming out tomorrow, so it is a time for a thread (with some help from the Muppets):
AS ALWAYS, the first order of business here is to look at Chapter 70 funding:
We should OF COURSE first recall that we are a year into implementation of the first year of the Student Opportunity Act...except we aren't:
Now, based on the local aid agreement of last week, it *does* appear that the House and Senate intend to implement ONE-SIXTH of the Student Opportunity Act in FY22.
Reminder, though, that one-sixth =/= two-sevenths, so while we will get there in the same period of time, we will not, this coming year, be where we were going to be if things went as planned.
It's another $20M in a $5.5 BILLION account...this makes good press, but if you think we're talking big money here...
which brings us to the change we're still seeking...
The Ways and Means agreement puts in a $40M "enrollment reserve" account for districts that had enrollment drops this past year.
Smooth sailing, right?
Nope.
This literally puts every district that depends on Ch. 70 aid and had a big drop in the Pre-K/K accounts here:
Two reasons:
1. It just plain isn't enough money. Per @massupt (Roger Hatch did the math here) 1/6th enrollment + hold harmless enrollment is $152M.
They're doing let's call it $22M + $40M = $62M.
We're short $90M. So that's not working.
2. (and this one I seem to have real trouble getting across to legislators, for some reason)
WE ARE DOING OUR BUDGETS NOW.
Districts need to know NOW how much money they can plan on spending next year, so they can hire teachers NOW (or ASAP), so they can bid out space NOW, so they can arrange for curriculum NOW.
THESE THINGS TAKE TIME.
Insufficient pothole accounts that don't get to districts until late summer? next fall? leave us here:
So do NOT come out with messaging about how you've provided for our enrollment issues for next fall if what you're offering is something outside of Ch. 70
NOTE: Supplemental budgets do the SAME THING.
While I'm sure we've all appreciated the irony of the decades fight over reforming the education funding system to get done just in time for it not to be funded, for that to be followed by it being funding but with an undercount of pupils takes this a bit far, let's say.
And can I just say:
If there were ever a year to ensure that we as a state are doing all that we can--in and OUT of school--for kids, wouldn't this be the year?
Shouldn't we be flooding summer programs and out of school programs as well as district programs with resources this year?
And so, looking for sufficient funding for school budgets.... #MAEdu
I’m sure that sometimes some of you think I am overreacting to the Boston Globe’s education coverage, but you probably couldn’t frame “how is this school funding reform working this year” WORSE than looking at Belmont, Harvard, and Westford.
I could try to invent one, but it’s an incredible manifestation of whom the Globe perceives its audience as AND how poorly it understands the state school funding system.
So I logged off last night to have dinner with my family and write about how the Globe was wrong about school finance (chapter MMXXIII), and it appears I missed some Discourse on Worcester Public Schools funding.
Y’all were busy!
And so, a thread:
Let me first note that when I teach MA school finance (which is part of what I do for work, for those who might be new), I start in 1647, so there’s some history here.
From a Worcester perspective, let’s sum up by saying that the early colonial law that required towns to have schools once they hit a particular size was violated more than once, resulting in the town being fined.
The reason for that is pretty straightforward: Chelsea is three square miles; Franklin County Regional Tech is 500 square miles. Both are Massachusetts school districts. As you might imagine, they spend WILDLY differing amounts on transportation.
What is different between Fall River--and, indeed, any municipal district in Massachusetts--and their neighboring regionals, is, that while BOTH have mandated state reimbursed transportation, only one of those reimbursements gets funded.
finally watching last week's Joint Ways & Means hearing, and appreciate @Jo_Comerford's question on the balance of one time versus sustained funding #MAEdu
she also did a lovely, polite refocus of her question; good chairing!
Cheers also to Sen @AnneGobi for opening her Q to @MassEducation a pointed: "on behalf of the entire Worcester delegation for your thoughtful and spot-on comments regarding the charter school in Worcester. It was extremely appreciated."
ok, good morning, I have a question (just getting to #MAEdu news from yesterday):
This MEEP claim that gaps have widened over the pandemic is based on...what exactly?
We don't yet have the last year's MCAS data. We don't yet have MA NAEP data.
The report cites 2019 to 2021 third grade reading scores, and then percentage of low income 9th graders passing their classes compared to wealthier peers.
Then enrollment in college, which we know dropped...everywhere?