Current precision oncology mainly targets actionable mutations & has limited patient coverage. We present the first precision oncology framework that systematically guides cancer treatment based on *synthetic lethal* vulnerabilities identified via the tumor transcriptome.
*Synthetic lethality* (SL) is an interaction between a pair of genes, where their individual inactivation has no phenotype, but their co-inactivation leads to cell death. We identified the SL pairs from analyzing a large collection of patient cohorts of 10k tumors.
The basic idea underlying the use of SLs for guiding patients is that a drug is likely to be more effective in patients where many of the SL partners of its targets are under-expressed in the tumor, thus leading to specific and selective tumor cell death.
SELECT prediction accuracy was tested on a large collection of 35 clinical trial datasets (spanning 14 targeted therapy and 21 immunotherapy cohorts across 10 cancer types), a scale markedly surpassing previous efforts to our knowledge.
For targeted therapy, SELECT is predictive of patients’ tumor response in 7 out of 10 clinical trial datasets with accuracy levels of AUC of ROC>0.7 and successfully predicts patient survival in 3 out of 4 additional cohorts.
For checkpoint immunotherapy, SELECT is predictive of tumor response in 15 out of 18 clinical trial datasets with accuracy levels of AUC>0.7 and successfully predicts patient survival in 3 additional cohorts (Gide et al. also shows AUC>0.7 in addition to the survival signal).
This collection includes a fresh pre-treatment transcriptomics profiles and treatment response data from Samsung Medical Center, where lung adenocarcinoma patients were treated with pembrolizumab (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.…).
Overall, through a retrospective analysis of 35 targeted or immunotherapy clinical trials of about 2,500 patients, SELECT is predictive of response in 28 out of 35 cases (80%) across 10 different cancer types.
Evaluating this approach retrospectively in a recent WINTHER multi-arm basket clinical trial, we show that SELECT is predictive of the response and that the fraction of patients benefitting from treatments may possibly be markedly increased by targeting SL vulnerabilities.
The attached figure illustrates reports that a clinician would receive from a SELECT analysis. Based on pre-treatment transcriptomic profiles of patients, an SL-score will be assigned to each drug, providing clinicians with personalized SL-based treatment options.
SELECT is the first synthetic lethality-based precision oncology tool for analyzing the tumor transcriptome. It shows considerable accuracy across many different targeted and immunotherapy trials, laying a basis for future prospective transcriptomics-based clinical trials.
Without the dedication of clinicians and patients involved in all the trials analyzed in this study, this research wouldn’t have been possible. We greatly thank them and made our codes and datasets publicly available for academic purposes (zenodo.org/record/4661265).
1/ Thrilled to share our latest breakthrough in #CancerResearch! We've developed a novel machine learning model to predict patient response to immunotherapy. 🧬💊🔬 #Immunotherapy #AI. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
2/ We analyzed eight cohorts of 2881 ICB-treated patients across 18 solid tumor types, the largest dataset to date, examining diverse clinical, pathologic, and genomic features.
3/ We investigated 20 machine-learning models and developed a new pipeline to identify the most predictive model for ICB response. Our final model, named LORIS, leverages six commonly measured clinical features to predict ICB objective response using the RECIST criteria.
Is chromosomal and/or focal copy number alterations predictive of patients’ survival following immunotherapy across all cancer types?
We answer this in our latest preprint, which contradicts major recently published claims about this relationship. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Various studies have shown that high tumor mutation burden (TMB) may predict response to immune checkpoint blockade, at least in some cancer types. However, identifying patients with low TMB that respond to cancer immunotherapy is an important open challenge.
One promising approach to identifying low-TMB responders of immunotherapy (ICB) has been to study the predictive ability of other measures of genomic alterations in cancer in these patients.
Drug target identification is at the heart of drug development, and we’ve been working to change how it’s been done.
We present DeepTarget: a new computational tool to characterize a drug’s mechanism of action in-depth beyond its primary target. 🧰🧵👇 biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
The traditional drug development pipeline selects drugs that induce the desired effect on a target of interest. At scale, this has resulted in a series of drugs with a partial & fragmented, or downright incorrect, mechanism of action (MOA).
We present a method to address this.
We present DeepTarget: a computational tool to characterize a drug’s MOA in-depth by identifying 1) its primary target(s), 2) whether it specifically targets the mutant or wildtype form, & 3) Secondary Targets mediating its response in absence of primary target. How do we do it?
Proud to share this!
We demonstrate that CRISPR-Cas9 based genetic editing selects for pre-existing mutant forms of two cancer driver genes (KRAS and P53) across delivery methods, cell types & is dependent on the gene being edited.
🧵How did we do this? nature.com/articles/s4146…
Why did we do this? 3 years ago 2 papers raised the concern that p53 mutants may be selected during CRISPR-Cas9 editing in HPCs. This called for a deep investigation of the selection of cancer driver mutants during CRISPR editing. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29892067/ nature.com/articles/s4159…
We systematically identified CAR targets for repurposing in solid tumors via a pan-cancer single cell transcriptomics analysis. This work is led by @sanna_madan@theNCI@umdcs. 1/10
CAR T cell therapy is a powerful and promising tool for unleashing lasting immunity against tumors, and is currently being studied in a myriad of clinical trials for various blood and solid cancers. 2/10
Mining 25 scRNA-seq datasets across 10 cancer types, we surveyed existing clinical CAR targets and aimed to identify new solid tumor types in which these targets are differentially expressed in tumor cells and not on non-tumor cells within the TME. 3/10
Excited to share our new preprint identifying the immune determinants of the association between tumor mutational burden and immunotherapy response across cancer types. An effort lead by @neelamsinha05@Sanjusinha7 🧵 1/13 biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
Last year, FDA approved High-tumor mutation burden (defined as >10mut/Mb) as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI, Pembro) treatment for all solid tumor types. 2/13
However, following this approval, multiple studies have indicated that TMB-High biomarker can identify ICI responders in only a subset of cancer types. But the mechanisms underlying this cancer type-specificity remain unknown. 3/13