The key problem with @NateSilver538 tweets about J&J withdrawal is that it ignores the requirements of clinical trials and the potential impact of ignoring them, and instead relies on raw statistical analysis. The consequences of doing so could prove disastrous to the entire...1
...system of drug testing/regulation and end the ability for emergency authorization. (Note: I am conveying an expert's analysis, not my own.) The key element here is scientific mechanism. If these six had experienced something for which there was no theoretical mechanism for...2
...the problem (such as being diagnosed with cancer 5 days after the vaccine, something impossible to be linked to vaccine and which would simply be the consequence of large numbers/probabiliy of event) it would be ignored. But the possibility of blood clots does have a...3
...theoretical mechanism for how it is happening. Unlikely, but possible. However, it's more likely that these people had been COVID infected sometime before vaccination, possibly even months before, because COVID causes blood clots that can be silent until long after symptoms..4
...pass. Add to that, this is an emergency application grant. J&J results are still being tested - we have enough data to know that it is highly, highly safe, but all of the results still fall under the requirements of clinical trial. Six may not seem like a lot. But, if it...5
...is the consequence of the vaccine, again, unlikely, then there is no way of knowing if the clots only show up in the first week, if the problems of the clots are hidden for months, like with COVID, if it is a generalized clot problem or if in certain populations it is...6
...a higher statistical probability. For example, if 5 of the people with clots were African Americans over the age of 50 with hypertension and diabetes, the statistical impact is higher. If the cause of the clots is linked to the vaccine in that group, given that clots can....7
...be hidden for a long time, recipients in that cohort who had experienced nothing would be given a temporary prescription for blood thinners until they could be seen by a doctor & tested. Now, if instead the rules of drug testing were ignored, and they continued on without...8
...saying anything or analyzing what was happening, big problem: Data is public. Someone would see it. The public would know *anyway* about this. Add to that, news that the FDA/CDC had ignored the requirements under drug testing (and again, this is one giant test through....
...emergency authorization) *all* of the vaccines and every drug granted emergency authorization ever would be suspect. The entire system of drug authorization would collapse under the weight of destroyed credibility, because raw cost/benefit analysis rather than science was...
...used to make the decision. Then drug authorization would seem little different than Ford conducting a cost/benefit analysis on the Pinto, decide that the chance of explosion was minuscule compared to the number of cars on the road, and that they could just settle for less...
...cost (in this case, getting vaccines out) then it would take to fix or analyze the problem. Thats what Ford did: The Pinto is dead, and it took Ford decades to regain consumer trust. So now, raw statistical analysis is irrelevant. What is relevant is right now determining...
...if the vaccine itself is the cause of blood clots or if it is a consequence of COVID or the cruelty of large numbers, if there is a subset of a cohort that is at higher risk, if there is a long term clotting problem, or if there is nothing at all. The full expectation is...
...nothing at all. That is why there is a pause, and not a withdrawal - to give time for the work. And there is one thing people should take away from this: The vaccines are safe. They are watching this like hawks. When there is the slightest indication that there might be....
...a chance of an issue, they jump on it. That should give mass confidence on Pfizer and Moderna, and when (as it likely) J&J is back, it is safe. That should be the message and lesson.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I find it bizarre people like @JennaEllisEsq are attacking @ReverendWarnock for discussing the transcendence of the meaning of the Resurrection. (In the process, abandoning part of that meaning.) We discussed this in seminary classes decades ago. Not a new thought. Read this.
...what the critics are doing is taking the primary meaning of the Resurrection - salvation through Christ - and reducing purely to a limited Pauline interpretation, where personal redemption through faith is all there is to it. But in reading the actual *teachings* of Jesus...2
...you find the underlying meaning of "salvation through faith in Christ." If it is reduced to "I believe" and that's it, then there are Nazis in heaven. You cannot separate faith in salvation through Christ from His teachings. Literally, entire classes are taught on the....3
GQP always lies about the impact in corporate tax cuts. They have little to no impact on jobs. I'll get into data below. But: It is merely a way to enrich the rich, to let corporations buy back stocks/increase after-tax profits so CEO stock options hit strike prices so they...1
...can exercise their options awarded as compensation "bonuses" (this means they can convert them into stock) and immediately sell them at a high price. Now, using the extra cash to hire people would keep after-tax profits *lower* than they could have been, which Wall Street...2
...analysts would take as a negative. It would hold down profit "growth" that isnt actual growth, and hold down stock prices, which are the single most important metric in senior executives personal enrichment. This is just legal stock manipulation to enrich GQP contributors...3
Some dems would throw away senate, lose committees, never get House bills to the floor cause Manchin - a democrat from a virulently red state - doesn't vote like a progressive. They say "He's GOP!" Let's compare real numbers. And note, these comparisons would be 0% for GOPrs:..1
When people rant "Someone died within days of receiving the vaccine!" - well, duh. It is the cruelty of large numbers. Of people between 65-84, out of, say, a group of 13,000,000, about 2,100 on average die per day. Far more than that 13 mil have received the vaccine. This...1
...means that, using the same logic, you could prove Christmas kills, or milk, or sunshine or a vaccine. This is why mortality correlation in anything for an elderly population is nuts. The ONLY number that matters when the cohort is large is excess death, not "a death." And...2
...there is no statistical evidence of excess death. None. You have to apply the same analysis to anything that happens to anyone. I could "prove" vaccines cause car accidents, or drowning or anything based on anecdote of a huge number of people. The anedotes were perfectly...3
...the government responded by running to court, court ordered that prosecutors could go to Trump and start seizing documents. And then this happened...3
...another one, this one Alan Garten's. Trump was insured for a project he threw his name on. But if he put in a claim, the insurance rates would have climbed. So, they denied there was insurance. Then they let the insurance lapse, and when they confessed, none was available...4
...continuation...Garten says the 5 year "mistake" was his...5
I've mentioned before, rather than risking making the COVID spread worse, spend this time to learn to cook. My adult sons have done that. Here are some of their recent dishes.
From my oldest: Chashu (Japanese braised pork belly.) On left, from the oven, then in the meal)...
...homemade butternut squash soup, also made by my oldest....
...from my youngest, Korean food: Bulgogi (Marinated Beef)
Gamja Jorim (Korean Braised Potatoes) Sesame Broccoli, Sigumchi Namul (Korean Seasoned Spinach)
Gyeran Mari(Korean Egg Roll Omelette)....