Murder in the 3rd degree requires that a person acted recklessly. Manslaughter in the 2nd requires that a person acted negligently.
I don't know about you, but I think a 26-year veteran of the police force shooting someone in broad daylight is pretty reckless.
In charging Potter with Manslaughter in the 2nd, prosecutors are essentially buying her argument that she mistook her taser for a gun.
Prosecutors do not normally believe what a defendant says.
Worth noting that if convicted of 2nd degree Manslaughter, Potter can get a non-prison sentence. She could face a fine.
Murder in the 3rd comes with mandatory prison time. Mohamed Noor was sentenced to 12 years.
And don't get me wrong, I don't believe prosecutors should overcharge - it's an immoral practice that coerces plea bargains.
Here, I honestly don't even think Murder 3 would be overcharging.
There is a chance that Potter could be indicted on Murder in the 3rd, if the DA chooses to present that charge to the grand jury (you might remember Amber Guyger was originally only charged with manslaughter), but with the Hennepin County DA handling the prosecution I doubt it.
You'll also remember that Murder in the 3rd Degree was an issue in Derek Chauvin's trial. That's because Mohamed Noor is appealing his conviction and appellate courts are considering whether the language of the statute applies to situations where only one person is in danger.
That arguably would not be an issue here because Potter's actions put multiple people in danger. You will remember that Daunte Wright's girlfriend was in the car with him.
In any case, the Court of Appeals case ordered the judge in Chauvin's trial to reinstate the Murder 3 count because, even tho the matter is being further appealed, the most recent Court of Appeals decision held that it does apply in situations where just one person is targeted.
Another point of contrast. Mohamed Noor had been on the force for just 21 months, Kim Potter 26 years.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
David Fowler, who today testified for Chauvin's defense, is being sued by Antwon Black's family for covering up police responsibility for his death.
Like George Floyd, Fowler found then 19-year-old Antwon died of cardiac arrhythmia caused by heart disease.theintercept.com/2021/04/04/der…
"The determination in Black’s case was part of a broader pattern of the medical examiner’s office relying on police narratives in cases involving deaths in custody, the complaint on behalf of the Black family argues."
Antwon Black died in eerily similar circumstances to George Floyd. "Both were unarmed. Both were pinned to the ground by multiple officers and said they were afraid of dying at the hands of police. Both cried out for their mothers. And both were ignored until it was too late."
Matt Loughery, the photographer who manipulated images of Khmer Rouge victims to make it appear they were smiling, did the same thing to old mug shots, was interviewed by the same journalist, and @VICE published that article two weeks ago. vice.com/en/article/pkd…
It appears the journalist who wrote the @vice story didn't even look at the original S21 photos to understand the photographer, Matt Loughrey, had not just colourised them but also changed them to make the victims appear to be smiling. vice.com/en/article/y3d…
Even more mind-blowing, when he is asked a question about the fact that some victims are smiling (again the interviewer has apparently not compared the original photographs) Loughrey says this:
My mentor and professor, Derrick Bell, (the founder of critical race theory jurisprudence) talked about this: in order to preserve White supremacy every now and then you have to allow people small victories so they don't challenge the underlying power structure.
He talked a lot about Brown v. Board of Education and the fact that 50 and then 60 years after the decision declaring legal segregation of public schools unconstitutional, they were more segregated than ever.