The @insidehousing team has spent weeks investigating the landlords yet to start work to remove dangerous ACM cladding from their blocks 4 years since Grenfell.
Firstly, nearly 4 years after the Grenfell Tower tragedy and despite gov pressure, a £200m removal fund, and the fact that ACM has been confirmed as really bloody dangerous 👇, these firms have yet to start work insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/gren…
Remember, this comes after the government stated in 2019 that work needed to be COMPLETED by June 2020.
Secondly, it exposes the problems with the UK property system.
Would like to think @insidehousing has some decent journos but even we have had to search hard for contacts for some. Sometimes it has taken days, or in some cases we haven't been able to find them at all...
It must be remembered that the freeholders are the responsible persons for blocks (although they often contract a management agent).
If journos are struggling to track down these freeholders, imagine what it is like for leaseholders
Two of the companies were totally uncontactable. In the case of Pinelink Developments they do not even seemingly have a Companies House page.
Where is the accountability for the leaseholders in a block like this?
In another case, Chaplair said it couldn't comment due to a 'confidentiality clause' with MHCLG.
When we contacted MHCLG, it dismissed this, saying there was nothing that stopped Chaplair from commenting.
When presented with this, Chaplair said it couldn't comment.
In other cases a number of the freeholders on the list were linked. Four linked companies make up a quarter of those that were on last month's list. Three have been removed now.
Despite many being freeholders with no reputation to really uphold, there are some developers in there. Despite turning profits from their development activities, four years after Grenfell they are still yet to start remediation.
What this does show what a blunt tool the government’s naming and shaming of landlords is.
There is a complete lack of reputational damage by just placing a list of names nobody has even heard of, or can’t find information about, on the bottom of a monthly data release.
That is until a trade mag spends weeks digging into exactly who these companies are and writes a piece about it.
Think that is what you call public interest journalism. Really proud of the @insidehousing news team's work.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So, here it is....@RICSnews has published its new guidance on which buildings should require the fire safety check.
The gov claims that it could mean 500,000 leaseholders no longer need the check. But what are the new rules, and is the gov right? Thread👇insidehousing.co.uk/news/new-guida…
First things first, what does the new guidance say.
1) Buildings four storeys and under will not require an EWS check, unless they contain certain materials. HPL has been added to this list from the first changes put forward by @RICSnews in Jan
2) For buildings between five an six storeys. EWS are not needed if cladding is not ACM, MCM or HPL, and if it covers less than 25% of building. If you have balconies, must not be timber-decked and not directly below others.
Great to see @insidehousing and the @EOCS_Official survey get pick up by LBC this morning. Some of the findings are eye opening:
👉1 in 6 leaseholders exploring bankruptcy options
👉1 in 3 face bills over £50k (15% £100k-plus)
👉68% must fix problems with defective firebreaks
One interesting takeaway is how politically important this issue is for the Conservative Party. The perceived inaction so far has clearly had an impact on the way its supporters may vote in the future
The gov looks set to announce its next plan to fix the cladding scandal. Looks like we could see funding increased to £5bn, with a £2bn levy on developers. Reported it will only be for removing cladding on buildings >18m.
Firstly, is a step in the right direction and testament to the work by groups like @UKCAG and @MCRcladiators. Two years ago, consisted of a handful of l’holders in ACM blocks and gov had given no money to private blocks. It is now a national movement. theguardian.com/society/2019/m…
The £5bn will help out a lot more leaseholders but will not get anywhere near the £15bn that it has been estimated fixing the building safety crisis will cost. There will be those that miss out. Once again, we could be looking at another ‘cladding lottery’ insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/leas…
🚨Grenfell lunchtime update🚨
Today we heard from expert witness Beryl Menzies, who is a specialist in building control.
Discussion revolved around the role of building control on large construction projects and its application at Grenfell.
Ms Menzies began by running through what she thought the role of the building safety inspector was, and whether it was a ‘safety net’ for construction projects👇
Two types of building control
Approved inspectors – private firms
Local authority - Council run
RBKC building control was in charge at Grenfell.
LA departments had been under pressures to achieve 'cost neutrality' since 2010 👇
This morning Peter Maddison (PM), the KCTMO’s director of assets and regen, gave evidence.
There was much discussion about the procurement of Rydon, and if meetings with the contractor before contract award breached procurement regulations.
More..
- PM was aware Rydon meeting would leave TMO open to challenge from other bidders
- Legal advice said certain meetings with contractors would breach procurement rules
- Emails reveal TMO told RBKC housing director to ‘bring pressure to bear’ on planners over cladding
Discussion begun around a meeting that took place between PM, other TMO staff, and Rydon on 18 March. A day before Rydon was officially chosen as the preferred bidder for the Grenfell refurb.