Pliny the Younger was invited to dinner in Rome in 97-8 AD. He then wrote a letter to his friend Avitus in which he basically trashed the party:
"It would be a long story, and of no great importance, to tell you by what accident I found myself dining the other day with...
... an individual with whom I am by no means intimate, and who, in his own opinion, does things in good style and economically as well, but according to mine, with meanness and extravagance combined.
Some very elegant dishes were served up to himself and a few more of us, whilst those placed before the rest of the company consisted simply of cheap dishes and scraps.
There were, in small bottles, three different kinds of wine - not that the guests might take their choice, but that they might not have any option in their power; one kind being for himself, and for us; another sort for his lesser friends...
... (for it seems he has degrees of friends), and the third for his own freedmen and ours.
My neighbor, reclining next me, observing this, asked me if I approved the arrangement.
"Not at all", I told him.
"Pray then," he asked, "what is your method upon such occasions?"
"Mine," I returned, "is to give all my visitors the same reception; for when I give an invitation, it is to entertain, not distinguish, my company; I place every man upon my own level whom I admit to my table."
"Not excepting even your freedmen?"
"Not excepting even my freedmen, whom I consider on these occasions my guests, as much as any of the rest."
He replied, "This must cost you a great deal."
"Not in the least."
"How can that be?"
"Simply because, although my freedmen don't drink the same wine as myself, yet I drink the same as they do."
And, no doubt about it, if a man is wise enough to moderate his appetite, he will not find it such a very expensive thing to share with...
... all his visitors what he takes himself.
Restrain it, keep it in, if you wish to be a true economist. You will find temperance a far better way of saving than treating other people rudely can be.
Why do I say all this?
Why, for fear a young man of your high character and promise should be imposed upon by this immoderate luxury which prevails at some tables, under the specious notion of frugality.
Whenever any folly of this sort falls under my eye, I shall, just because I care for you, point it out to you as an example you ought to shun.
Remember, then, nothing is more to be avoided than this modern alliance of luxury with meanness; odious enough when existing separate and distinct, but still more hateful where you meet with them together.
Farewell."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Colorized by me: Australian soldier, Private George "Dick" Whittington, being aided by Papuan orderly Raphael Oimbari near Buna on 25 December 1942. Whittington died in February 1943 from typhus.
Fuzzy Wuzzy Angels was the name given by Australian soldiers to Papua New Guinean war carriers who, during World War II, were recruited to bring supplies up to the front and carry injured Australian troops down the Kokoda trail during the Kokoda Campaign.
📸 George Silk
In June 1942, Australian Major General Basil Morris issued an "Employment of Natives Order", which allowed native Papuans to be recruited as carriers for three years.
Ida Laherty, age 16, became one of the first women incarcerated at the Idaho State Penitentiary when she began a sentence for Grand Larceny in 1903. She remained one of the youngest women to serve time there.
Born in Washington, Ida lost her father when she was 11 years old, and her mother was left to raise six children alone. Ida left home at fifteen, settling in Moscow, Idaho. There she met and fell in love with a young man from Reardon, Washington named William Loomis.
One day, Loomis hatched a plan for Ida to hire a team of horses for one day from a livery stable in Moscow and ride by herself to Sprague, Washington where William would meet her and the two would sell the horses for a large profit.
Maria Coventry, Countess of Coventry was a famous Irish beauty and London society hostess during the reign of King George II.
She died at a young age (27) from lead and mercury poisoning, killed by the toxins used in her makeup.
Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, it was fashionable for ladies to have pale white skin and red rouged cheeks. To achieve this look, lead-based Venetian ceruse was often used.
The noxious effects of lead caused skin eruptions...
... which then encouraged ladies to apply more ceruse to cover the blemishes, eventually causing blood poisoning.
Maria eventually became known in society circles as a "victim of cosmetics". Her face was eaten away by acid.
There’s a huge gap between colorizing photos, usually presenting them beside the original and preserving all the elements that were there + providing the historical background, and manipulating facial expressions. The latter changes the context and is potentially dangerous.
This whole thing makes me sad. It affects artists who have been working hard for years to make people understand that we are not playing around with crayons. There’s usually a huge sense of responsibility involved.
I've been working on a piece to explain the process. There are serious people working in this field.