Unless I'm missing something - I think Dr. Tobin just testified to the exact thing Judge Cahill instructed the prosecution NOT TO EVEN MENTION

We might be looking at a mistrial
Ok - objection sustained, but apparently no mistrial
And they've moved on

They got VERY close to a mistrial right there
To explain: the prosecution tried to - THIS MORNING - introduce some test results on Floyd's carboxyhemoglobin levels

Judge Cahill excluded them on the grounds that it was far too late and would prejudice the defense
When Dr. Tobin talked about the "blood gas" results he came VERY VERY close to doing the exact thing that Cahill warned would lead to a mistrial
They are deep in legal argument right now - as others have said I think Nelson is moving for a mistrial
Straight into recess

This is a very serious moment, Judge Cahill does not look happy, we still may see a mistrial
I think Nelson would take the mistrial over prosecutors being able to cheat out evidence at the last minute making the defense medical expert look bad

Their use-of-force expert was terrible, Nelson is relying on Fowler for the acquittal

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Chamberlain

Will Chamberlain Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @willchamberlain

17 Apr
Everyone aggrieved by the notion that we have Anglo-Saxon traditions worth preserving should yell at the Supreme Court for continuing to cure Blackstone

Where do you guys think the common law come from
Hi folks, a brief introduction to history: not all values and institutions are universal, some come from particular cultural traditions
Then again it makes sense that the same historically illiterate neocons like @RepKinzinger who think we can just install democracy in Afghanistan are the ones appalled by the suggestion that our traditions are rooted in any particular culture
Read 4 tweets
13 Apr
31 million Americans got COVID, 562,000 died

6.6 million Americans got the J+J vaccine, 6 have blood clots
It’s like Sharon28543755 in my mentions is running the FDA now
It’s an honor to have the new director of the CDC in my mentions
Read 4 tweets
12 Apr
She was incompetent and it resulted in the man's death

That's what Man 2 is for
That's what we mean by "gross negligence"

Read 4 tweets
10 Apr
Any Dem who has even the slightest issue with what Tucker Carlson said recently should take it up with Julian Castro
Democrats have 1) gloated about how immigration will turn states blue and 2) advanced policies to decriminalize illegal immigration

They do not like Texas' electorate - and rather than persuade Texans, they seek to change the composition of that electorate
And as Tucker explained, this isn't about *race*

It's about *citizenship*

Our immigration policy should prioritize the interests of American citizens over those of non-citizens

Instead, Democrats seek to use non-citizens to disenfranchise citizens
Read 5 tweets
10 Apr
David French wrote a whole column whining about Justice Thomas' brilliant Big Tech opinion

But I want to focus in on this passage right here

Simply put - he's defined "free speech" so broadly that it would eviscerate civil rights law
If social media moderation decisions are free speech - EVEN in the face of laws like section 230 that explicitly say the platform is not the speaker - then any act of exclusion is free speech

Meaning that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is unconstitutional on free speech grounds
When French says that the companies are merely "creat[ing] communities that reflect their own private visions of what a marketplace of ideas should look like"

He should think about how that would apply to Jim Crow restauranteurs and hotel owners
Read 6 tweets
9 Apr
"ceaseless assemblage of negotiations and compromises."

Is it like Thesaurus day or something? This is incredibly awkward usage
For the English nerds:

"ceaseless" connotes something happening over time

"assemblage" has nothing to do with time

Better word choice would be "ceaseless procession"
Even better word choice would be "endless negotiations and compromises."

Omit needless words
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!