In honor of PhD application season winding down, here's a tweet-thread-that-should-probably-be-a-blog-post on things I have observed through hearing from a LOT of PhD applicants in many different fields over the past eight months. TL;DR this process can be better. 🧵
Consider things admissions committees or faculty might expect to see in an application: LORs from certain types of people that mention certain things, statements of purpose with certain elements (faculty mentioned, why this program, etc.)

Are applicants TOLD these expectations?
As one critical example, are you in a field where it is common or there is even an expectation that applicants reach out to potential advisors before they submit an application? Is there any reason applicants would know this if they don't already have mentorship in that field?
Are there faculty in your department who are far more likely to take on new PhD advisees than others (because of funding, capacity, etc.) to the point where faculty mentioned in an application will have a strong impact on someone's odds of admission?
If you have a minimum GRE score or GPA listed on the application page, is that actually the case? Would you really not consider someone without those thresholds? Have you thought about how that might turn away potentially qualified applicants who have other strengths?
Do you sometimes see a PhD application and think "wow they did everything right, clearly they have good mentorship!"

If so, it's worth considering how fair these metrics are and/or whether there's a way to level the playing field by just telling applicants what they are.
I'm working on making some changes to our PhD application for the next cycle, in terms of providing more information about what makes a good application, and even scaffolding some good practices directly.

Considering auditing your application for gatekeeping!
Also I am MORE CONVINCED THAN EVER that PhD programs should do away with required GRE scores. I personally think they're a garbage signal and can also confirm now that they cause applicants a lot of anxiety to the point where some self-select out of applying entirely. :(

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD

Casey Fiesler, PhD, JD, geekD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cfiesler

19 Mar
This thread is for live-tweeting the ethics session at #SIGCSE2021. FIVE papers at @SIGCSE_TS this year about ethics in computer science education! 🧵
First up: "How Students in Computing-Related Majors Distinguish Social Implications of Technology" by Diandra Prioleau et al. at University of Florida.

They presented students with scenarios about AI technology (e.g. recidivism algorithms)...
... and found that their participants could spot social implications, but frequently missed issues of systemic discrimination. But surprisingly: About half of students had never heard of these issues, which points to a gap in computing curriculum. dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/34…
Read 14 tweets
9 Mar
As you know, I am a fan of @tiktok_us these days, but I need to put them on blast for a bad design choice. Folks interested in content moderation/platform safety, buckle up. This is a story about bad people exploiting a loophole for harassment. We can learn from this. [Thread 🧵]
TikTok has a "block" feature that works similarly to Twitter. If you block someone, you can't see them and they can't see you. This includes comments.

So now we have A (person being harassed) and B (awful person who thinks it's fun to e.g. leave death threats in comments)...
B has figured out that they can comment on A's post and then immediately block A, which then means that A can't see that comment - and in fact doesn't even know it's there since it doesn't show up in their notifications.
Read 8 tweets
7 Mar
Some thoughts on why this news - the potential for next gen watches (both Samsung Galaxy and Apple) to provide blood glucose readings - could be game-changing (not so much for #T1D folks but for everyone else). macrumors.com/2021/03/05/app…
This tech would almost certainly not be an improvement over existing continuous glucose monitors like what I use, but (I think?) it's rare for people with Type 2 to have insurance coverage for CGMs, especially if you're not on insulin and don't have to worry about lows.
The beauty of continuous monitoring over finger sticks is that you can get DATA. Unless you waste a lot of (expensive!) test strips to try to experiment, you're not going to know e.g. exactly when and how much your blood sugar spikes after meals.
Read 6 tweets
26 Feb
Ever thought about how messed up it is from a harm vs benefit perspective that copyright infringement is more heavily moderated/enforced than, say, hate speech and harassment? I was reminded of this by re-listening to this @ThisAmerLife episode. [Thread🧵] thisamericanlife.org/670/beware-the…
The second act is the story of Lenny Pozner, the father of a Sandy Hook victim, who was harassed, threatened, and stalked by Alex Jones fueled conspiracy theorists accusing him of being a "crisis actor." And one tactic was making cruel memes out of photographs of his son. The Sandy Hook deniers downloaded them, and repurposed them
And after trying to report content and get things taken down for lies and harassment, he finally realized that his best course of action was reporting copyright violations since he owned the photographs which were e.g. used in a YouTube video. He decided he was going to get every single copy of the movi
Read 6 tweets
18 Jan
string.replace("sexual", "political")

Not that I was *surprised* to see this study about predicting "political orientation," but since I've been talking about the "gaydar" (sigh) algorithm from the same researcher for a while now, here's some reflection.
nature.com/articles/s4159…
Given criticism of the previous paper (which if you're not familiar is here: psyarxiv.com/hv28a/ ) I was genuinely expecting to see an ethical considerations section by the end of this paper (since that criticism pretty much constructed it exactly!). There is not one.
There is a lengthy "author notes" document linked to from the article that includes FAQs (like "physiognomy????") and twice warns to not "shoot the messenger" so I guess that's the ethics statement.
Read 12 tweets
10 Jan
Hm. I wonder what happens when a community moves off a platform because accounts are getting banned for reasons that conflict with the values of that community?

Or: I'm not saying Trump supporters have a lot in common with fanfiction writers, but remember LiveJournal? [Thread]
In 2007, LiveJournal suspended a bunch of accounts in an attempt to remove certain kinds of objectionable content, and this ended up sweeping up a lot of fanfiction and fan art accounts/communities. People were Not Happy. fanlore.org/wiki/Strikethr…
This policy change by LiveJournal was directly (if of course only partially) responsible for the conceptualization and creation of Archive of Our Own. And the rallying cry was: own the servers!!! cmci.colorado.edu/~cafi5706/CHI2…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!