Drew Holden Profile picture
Apr 15, 2021 26 tweets 28 min read Read on X
🧵THREAD🧵

Today the “Russian bounties” story - where Russia was supposedly paying to have US soldiers killed - quietly imploded.

For the last year, Dems, the media & others have pushed this conspiracy theory endlessly.

If you think that’s exaggerative, have a look⤵️
The worst offender was @nytimes, who broke the original story and went on to convince the families of soldiers who had been KIA that perhaps the Russians were to blame and President Trump didn’t care.

Will we get a follow up? Will the families? ImageImageImageImage
But they were far from alone. @CNN pushed the conspiracy theory just as frequently as anyone did.

You’ll notice that, while some of the stories note the bounties are “alleged”, eventually CNN dropped that, despite the narrative being disputed (and having since fallen apart). ImageImageImageImage
@CNN also made a habit of having elected Dems on to suggest a path forward on these unverified allegations, glossing over the fact that they may or may not even be true. Here’s @SenGillibrand and @SenDuckworth. (More on electeds later) ImageImage
@brianstelter, I’m asking you earnestly: will you retract this story? Or at least amend it significantly, given the implications of your reporting?

If not, why not? ImageImageImage
@washingtonpost gave Trump Four Pinocchios on a fact check when he said that the intel - which, again, was unverified and has since evaporated - was even disputed.

I mean, cmon! ImageImageImageImage
But probably the most unhinged in their insistence was @MSNBC. They pushed this conspiracy theory time and time again across their platform as if the allegations were rock solid.

Turns out, they weren’t. @FrankFigliuzzi1, @Lawrence ImageImageImageImage
@MSNBC unsurprisingly got their chief Russian propagandist, @maddow/@MaddowBlog involved on this one, too.

You would think that the Russian collusion hoax imploding would chasten her. Apparently not. ImageImageImageImage
But Maddow isn’t @MSNBC’s only conspiracy theorist.

@JoyAnnReid was one of the most outspoken proponents of the Russian bounties conspiracy theory (these are only a handful of her tweets - she could’ve had a thread to herself). ImageImageImageImage
The rush among outlets to go from explosive but unconfirmed reports to gospel truth was contagious.

Here’s just a few stories from @politico: ImageImageImageImage
I know it isn’t much of the money they get but it’s still jarring to me that @NPR is allocated money from US taxpayers.

Notice particularly in this first one how the story is clearly framed as if the allegations are already beyond dispute. ImageImageImageImage
@thedailybeast broke this story - which I’ve linked to at the end of the thread - which is good and important reporting.

They also pushed the original bounties claim, too. ImageImageImageImage
But this only scratches the surface. Everyone was running with this story despite all the red flags.

Here’s just a smattering from:
@Reuters
@AssociatedPress
@NBCNews (yikes)
@NYDailyNews ImageImageImageImage
And you’ll remember that plenty of politicians got involved in this narrative, too.

@JoeBiden and @KamalaHarris made it an important component of their campaign.

How many voters’ minds might this conspiracy theory have changed? ImageImage
They weren’t alone. Lots of other powerful Democrats got involved. The Senate in particular went into a full court press.

Here’s just a few, from:
@SenDuckworth (the loudest critic on this, and worth doubling up on)
@SenWarren
@SenMarkey
@CoryBooker ImageImageImageImage
And the lower house wasn’t any better. @SpeakerPelosi was probably the worst offender.

In retrospect, it sure looks like Trump was right to call the story - forced out of terrorist detainees - a hoax. ImageImageImage
But there were plenty of others in the House. Many of the names won’t shock you. Here’s:
@RepSwalwell (go figure)
@RepAdamSchiff (double go figure)
@tedlieu (quickly becoming a 🧵favorite) and
@sethmoulton (“treasonous behavior”) ImageImageImageImage
Of course the trolls, grifters, child predators and the rest of the ghouls at @ProjectLincoln were pushing this one hard.

I try to have grace and charity on here. I can’t muster it with the Lincoln Project. ImageImageImageImage
Obligatory @kurteichenwald and @SethAbramson mentions (just unhinged stuff here). ImageImageImageImage
It won’t surprise you that the Never Trump crowd were adamant about this story. Here we see @SteveSchmidtSES, @BillKristol, @TheRickWilson (plus @MollyJongFast, who like Rick has also blocked me) and no thread would be complete without @JRubinBlogger ImageImageImageImage
All of the internet loudmouths were on this one. I’ve only got so much space and so much patience but here we’ll see:
@DanRather
@tribelaw (go figure)
@KevinMKruse and
@Scaramucci (this might be libel?) ImageImageImageImage
There hasn’t been a more widespread or pernicious conspiracy theory in recent memory than “Russian bounties.” It was always thinly sourced and disputed. Yet it was treated as the gospel truth because Orange Man Bad.

Where are the corrections? Where are the retractions?
I don’t think we’ll get any. I don’t think any heads will roll. I don’t think any lessons will be learned.

But you know what I do think? I do think this’ll happen again. And that’s embarrassing.
In many ways, this story was the Russian Collusion hoax in miniature: Trump is bad, so we’ll believe anything that’s said about him, especially if it involves Russia.

A truly shameful showing from those who are meant to tell the American people the truth.
For those who have asked, I don’t have anything to sell or subscribe to. But if you can, food banks are in desperate need because of the pandemic, and need your help.

For those in DC, Capital Area Food Bank is a great option. capitalareafoodbank.org

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Jun 27
🧵Thread🧵

You remember Russian Collusion. But do you remember the “Russian bounties” allegation, where the press ran with a conspiracy theory to make Trump look like a monster?

With the debate tonight, I think it’s timely to revisit a falsehood Biden pushed. Follow along ⤵️
It started with a scoop from @nytimes that claimed Russia had placed bounties on American soldiers in Afghanistan, that Trump knew about it, and he did nothing.
Image
Image
Days later, @washingtonpost followed up with the claim that these bounties—again, allegedly ignored by Trump—led to the deaths of American servicemen.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 24 tweets
Jun 12
🧵Thread🧵

Do you *really* remember the Hunter Biden laptop story? I fear we’ve lost the plot.

With Hunter’s name in the news I wanted to revisit the extent to which the media went to cover up corruption allegations against—and at the behest of—his father.

Follow along. ⤵️
You have to start with the scoop from @nypost and @EmmaJoNYC.

Their lede from October was damning:

“Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company.”Image
Image
Image
The story was fundamentally about Joe Biden’s alleged corruption. It was huge news, on the eve of an election.

The press leapt to claim the scoop wasn’t legit. And they reframed the issue: now it was about Hunter, not Joe. Here’s @NPR before/after
Image
Image
Read 27 tweets
May 29
Good to see the NYT’s considerable resources being put to finding the truth in a debate between private citizens that led one of them to raise a flag upside down.

Real afflict the comfortable, comfort the afflicted stuff here.
This is not, in a well ordered universe, news.

It has only become “news” because of the pivot to left wing clickbait that Trump inspired among the press.
It’s politically inspired harassment and not only is it noxious it’s driving a deep animus among its target demo that is fraying what remains of the bounds of our body politic and society more broadly.
Read 4 tweets
May 28
🧵Thread🧵

I’ve got an oldie-but-a-goodie for you from the archive of unhinged media coverage.

Do you remember how insane the coverage of Trump’s killing of Iranian Gen. Soleimani was?

I bet it’s worse than you remember. Follow along ⤵️
It all started with what I’ve gotta say might be the coldest presidential use of social media in history.

After ordering the strike that killed Iranian General Qaseem Soleimani, Trump tweeted out simply a picture of an American flag.

Many in the media went berserk. Image
First, the issue was directly with what Trump had done. Outlets claimed that he was rushing America into a war. @washingtonpost tried to point out the hypocrisy of a president who had said he would prevent a war.

All evidence suggests he did exactly that.
Image
Image
Read 25 tweets
May 23
My hottest take is that, outside of the Beltway (something, to be clear, I am not!) most Americans to the right of MSNBC simply don’t feel anything like “vertigo” about Trump. Image
I think part of why Trump is such a visceral experience for so many people who have been in DC for a long time is that these types of people (again, me included!) weren’t familiar with the idea that they could viscerally hate a politician even when he’s out of office.
I think, for lots of people, hating a politician for who they are is not a new experience, but is in fact their default setting for politicians of at least one political party — if not both.
Read 5 tweets
May 22
If you were making a parody of MSNBC, what would you do differently than what the network already produces? Image
I recognize this is an opinion piece but the decision to run an opinion piece is…a decision.
I’m imagining every on-air host at MSNBC reading this headline and starting to think this could be a Veep-like tv show.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(