My first pick in #whatwentwrong would be a journalistic establishment that forgot to ask hard questions of the political bigwigs and forgot that it’s loyalty lies with the public to specifically amplify and uncover the truth.
The only reason that Indian journalism is still standing is because of a handful of outlets and platforms that stuck to their guns.
I say this because instead of holding leaders responsible their absolute nonsense was amplified. It took three months between when I first posted about Covid loans taken by the Indian govt. and when a financial platform ran with the story AFTER i contacted them to follow it up.
And even after that no questions were raised about where the money went.
One can say “we were caught unprepared” when there is some exogenous shock. We can’t say we were unprepared when the whole world is in a pandemic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gwalior district administration seems to have its socks on. A day after a positive Covid test for family, quarantine poster, three follow up calls by docs and med bundle from the admin have reached the affected home. Not bad, but would keep my eye on the critical cases.
Med bundle includes Zinc tablets, vitamin B and C, Erithromycin and Montaire (maybe spelling it wrong). One bundle for each affected person.
My worry is that these are t he easier things to do.I.e., handling the non-critical cases. But the real test for admin effectiveness lies in the handling and marshaling of resources for critical cases.
Humbly and completely disagree. In India the govt led the public to believe that pseudoscientific nonsense like bartan banging would vanquish a virus. Then they slapped a horrible lockdown without proper thought leading to
desperation and deaths of migrant workers. They ended up ghettoizing these workers and encouraging the spread of the disease. The money taken as Covid loans and contributions to PM Cares has not been accounted for or transparently shown to have been used for the benefit of
a collapsing health care system. The govt was not able to stop profiteering by hospitals and unable to criminalize denial of medical care.
They also didn’t allow all vaccines to be used in India when we should have had multiple vaccines in play in Jan like every other sane
I’m going to do a slightly substantial thread in Sadanand Dhume’s piece for @WSJ because I am quite disturbed at the flex the debate is taking. The problems in the piece go far beyond a debate on how “gentle” the govt has been on the farmers. Thread. 👇🏽
This causation is misrepresented. There’s a history to this. During the Green Revolution Punjab and Haryana moved to the wheat-paddy cultivation cycle from their traditional crops. This was encouraged and as we all know from CBSE textbooks, was done in the national interest.
At that time sustainability wasn’t a watchword but by 1980 a massive decline in the water table was noted. Why? Because paddy required five times more irrigation than wheat. So if you irrigate a wheat crop six times in one season, paddy will require 30 irrigations.
Something that just struck me as I’m prepping for a lecture. The Indian state right now has trouble reading people as rational, choice-making entities. It finds it easier to read people as ethnic entities because that’s how it has shaped its own discourse.
If you present yourself as a non-ethnic entity, it has massive trouble with you. Anyone who wants to transcend their worldview becomes a problem. Just a thought. Still working on it.
So when Sikh farmers come forward with a policy/economic issue, the state has to crunch it into an ethnic issue before it can respond.
What is the price ORF is willing to pay for a policy?
The piece says “The reforms that have so incensed protesters go further in addressing Indian agriculture’s most intractable problems than any previously contemplated. Those changes need to be protected, not abandoned.”
And “What’s at risk isn’t just a couple of laws, but India’s commitment to the transition to a more environmentally sustainable and equitable growth model.”