1/
the sources of wokeism? let's examine :-)
2/
wokeness as we know it is a self-perpetuating structure. it is a memetic life form.
3/
there's some dispute whether to consider wokeness a free living organism or a cancer.

4/
the wokeism is *shaped* by the US constitution:

religion being banned from official positions of power lets the "totally not a religion" religious movement dominate actual religions. missing is a proper mechanism for legally deeming wokeism a religion against its liking.
5/
wokeism is also adapted to leverage lack of protection for freedom of association - using tribal concerns as political wedges.

1: include those people or you are racist
2: cater to their interests now that they are in

note it's a ratchet - you aren't allowed to ask them out.
6/
that's the one source of wokeness: the *environment* of our society, where it underwent the natural selection.

the other source of wokenes is, well, *construed*.
7/
next up: blame Pasteur and Darwin (and their predecessors, to be fair):

through disproving the presumption of spontaneous generation of biological life, they laid the groundwork for *construction* of memetic life.
8/
Fabian Society and the likes figured they can make long-running, self-perpetuating memetic structures that will enact their vision of society; this is the upper class take on it

Marx published a three-layered DIY handbook for the vulgar (middle) class

7/
what kind of structures do they think of?

you'd be surprised: they want to just chill with their wives, insulated from wants and instabilities of the society. the exact problems they want to insulate themselves from depend on their moral values.
8/
rejection of "tradition" in the evangelical christianity, paralleled by rejection of traditional wisdom in the enlightenment.

this lets reason run *unchecked* by actual facts on the ground. while it's pretty good most of the time, when it goes wrong, it goes *very* wrong.
9/
why tradition? it's a body of knowledge and experience that passed the test of time. it is capable of correctly tackling problems and concepts that still elude our (limited!) reason.

tradition is the "senate" to reason's "house", if you know what i mean :-)
10/
@apex_simmaps provides an excellent contention, and prompts me to re-think my approach.

looking forward to a more extensive substack post on it 👍
11/
unironically this

told you - 4 tweets up :-)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with mark doppelgänger 🛰

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoppelMark

19 Jan
1/
@MorlockP charts the road ahead, and tells us that we - yes we - are authoring a great story arch right now

the most important thread of the day 👀

2/
how do you know the plan is good?

it's self-replicating, antifragile, grows prosperity into the future:
3/
unsaid, but indicated through the thread:
the coalition covers the Order and the Freedom people
the Equality ones can stuff it

Read 6 tweets
18 Jan
2/
the more i dug into the article, the more the header image was *haunting*

#nospoilers beyond "the main show is the side show"

also, bonus points for mentioning 0HP 👍
3/
i can only dream to maybe, somehow, reach 10% of @parallaxoptics' writing acumen: the complex emotions are conveyed in the plain, precise language and meticulous typography 👍

incidentally, who are Land and Jim, and where do i find their work?
Read 5 tweets
13 Jan
>self-replicating vanguard probe
even more dangerous than a "paperclip maximizer"
>get with the program
can you prove *we* aren't a self-replicating vanguard probe?

>panspermia
but ran by memetic beings.

we're pretty good *substrate* for memes to live off of.

Read 4 tweets
13 Jan
1/
Jason raises several objections to my take on Gab & the anime tiddy problem; his thread is worth reading.

i honestly can't give satisfactory answers here as the *frame of reference* is partly orthogonal to mine - and my vocabulary for highly derived problems is lacking :-)
2/
my support for Gab's choice is nuanced:

i don't like *the* choice they made.
i do like the fact they were *able to* make a choice.
3/
the dualism (direct dislike / meta like) has a parallel in the freedom of speech problem: do we allow people to advocate abolishing freedom of speech?

*allowing* is defeatist; *disallowing* is self-defeatist.

of course that's a false dichotomy :-)
Read 4 tweets
13 Jan
Moldmeme's new article is going places

and people will refuse to acknowledge implications, and will find *roundabout* arguments to preemptively shoot even an option of discussing them 😎

Image
in which Moldmeme plays with the reader:

>So the victim creates the bully

has also an entirely different, much darker, meaning when discussing journalists.

Moldmeme leaving that one out on purpose to make us think harder. Image
in which Moldmeme plays with the reader some more:

>not designed for managing the minds of people
>is ran on advertising spend

think, dear reader, think very hard Image
Read 6 tweets
13 Jan
1/
Gab and the "anime tiddy question": friends express worry over my fully, vocal support of Gab's decision.

it's a good thing to have on *a* network; can be a local choice.

would be a *bad* thing if on every network; should *not* be a global mandate.
2/
as mentioned times before, i'm for much freedom and some order; that's my base values. i'm also big fan of localism; of communities running their affairs to their own best interest. this includes gatekeeping - gatekeeping is good.

this comes to head with Gab.
3/
Gab is a widely successful *ecosystem* - web services and apps and a brand.

the success clearly indicates their particular choices that are attractive to a sizable number of people. those people end up joining, contributing, and also promoting it in their social circles.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!