I had this somewhat bizarre but lovely experience meeting Helen McCrory. She was the lead in Deep Blue Sea at the National and was on the northern line on her way in, as was I (going to Temple). I was banging onto a friend about some issue I had in a case, obviously too loud.
On the platform at Embankment up came this tiny woman wearing a tracksuit and baseball cap. “Hello, I’m an actress and couldn’t help overhearing your conversation...”. Turned out she was about to appear in an ITV show playing a human rights lawyer. She very graciously asked if I
would look over the scripts with her and give any tips on accuracy. I’m embarrassed to say I didn’t know who she was as I hadn’t seen anything at the time with her in. We met the next day at Fleet St coffee and spent a couple of hours on the script. She was fiercely
intelligent and knowledgable as you might expect. She then invited me and @jrwagz to the last night of her show and we went to the aftershow party... on our anniversary! She was just so nice and down to earth. She seemed interested in the work I was doing
and was obviously a class act. She went on to promote the human rights charity I set up when doing media rounds for the new series. I really liked her - and went on to watch Peaky Blinders and other stuff she was in, including Deep Blue Sea which was just amazing. RIP - too young
There has been some discussion on my timeline as to whether (a) Prince Philip's funeral would be subject to the Covid regulations at all, and (b) if so whether The Queen would be.
Thank you to those who illuminated this for me, I had not given it much thought
Is Windsor Castle subject to the Covid regulations (currently the "Steps" regulations - here )?
The starting point is that the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 only appears to apply to "Crown property" by agreement - see section 73
The Steps regulations (we are now in Step 2) have rules for funerals which require it to be held in a a "public outdoor place" amongst other potential venues.
A "public outdoor place" is defined as including "crown land to which the public has access "
Explanatory note:
- Change to definition of “linked household”
- clarify that customers may enter premises serving alcohol to pay for their food and drink,
- clarify which facilities may remain open in campsites, caravan parks and self-contained holiday accommodation
This is actually an important change as it clarifies something which hasn't been clear for months - whether a linked household has to have *only* one or more children under 1 or can have a child under 1 plus others who are not.
I really enjoyed the new Briefing Room with @DAaronovitch about Covid responses around the world. Have been thinking about this final bit continuously since I heard it 1/3 podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the…
Has a too individualistic approach to rights has stood in the way of effective response to Covid? I don’t agree that this is an effective attack on liberal democracy but it is a critique which liberals need to take seriously 2/3
I have a new article on vaccine passports coming later where I question if some of us have been taking too narrow an approach to human rights - and not paying enough attention to social and economic rights, and perhaps we are too stuck in old paradigms. Anyway, one to discuss 3/3
This is plausible under the current restrictions, which mandate a negative test, further test, & 10 days’ self-isolation for visitors from non-Red List countries BUT don’t require the visitor to be coming for any particular reason (as is the case for citizens leaving the UK) 1/3
Coming to the UK as a tourist has become a lot easier since 29 March when the ‘leave/be outside home without a reasonable excuse’ restriction was removed as there is no longer any (even potential) legal ban on tourism to the UK. 2/3
The net effect is that it is illegal for a UK resident to leave the UK for a holiday but legal for a non-UK resident from a non red list country to enter and be in the UK for a holiday as long as they self-isolate and test 3/3