"Anglo American values" = the United States and its institutions
Samuel P. Huntington noted in "Who Are We?" that by 1790 the US European settler stock that created America's founding documents and institutions was 98 percent Protestant, 80 percent British, 60% ethnically English. A lot of that has changed, but the history hasn't
Huntington and others argued convincingly that no other group had a greater impact on America's foundational documents and institutions and ideas of government. But what should be a simple and harmless statement of fact is of course controversial in Current Year
Counterpoint:
The only real debate imo is whether there was something about 18th century Anglo-Saxon liberalism that made where we are now an inevitability, not whether they had a dominant influence on the founding

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Pedro L. Gonzalez

Pedro L. Gonzalez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emeriticus

17 Apr
The ultimate irony of the Anglo-Saxon tradition debate is the fact Angloids seem to be the ones who are the most offended by the idea their traditions are worth preserving
On the level of elites anyway, where these debates take place
Worth noting that you can't find another civilization in history where the elites have deliberately dismantled what their ancestors built while also demonizing them
Read 4 tweets
30 Mar
Having a kid has made the encroachment of transgender ideology deeply personal for me and has made me less tolerant of people like David French. I quite literally cannot understand people who go along with this stuff and Republicans who cede even an inch are worse than losers.
Even more unfathomable are people that take their kids to drag queen story hour. You're ruining your child's innocence because you want to feel virtuous about tolerating the intolerable--and that's best case scenario
*corporations and sociopaths pushing cross sex hormones on kids*

david french: now now blessings of liberty white christians are the real problem here's a column about my favorite marvel movies
Read 5 tweets
28 Mar
The important thing about the spat between James Lindsay and Alex Kaschuta is that Lindsay's behavior is a reminder that "classical liberalism" is a relative of leftism and generally fights the right harder than the left who it views as a kind of misguided cousin (because it is)
The right poses an existential threat whereas the left is just kind of out of control but certainly well-meaning!
Cannot recommend James Burnham’s Suicide of the West enough here, really made the most convincing case I've ever read
Read 4 tweets
26 Mar
honestly this is how i talked every day about californians as a lifelong californian living in california
its almost 2am and im trying real hard not to wake up my wife and kid laughing at this
Read 5 tweets
23 Mar
Professional and college sports are a massive scam that make you a fat, impotent spectator of life and are the equivalent of pornography in that you are watching men do what you merely settle for fantasize about

Also they're cash cows for the people ruining America
Study in Europe found people who watch "sports every day were at higher risk of obesity after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, total TV time, disability, and self-rated health." The same is true and probably worse in America researchgate.net/publication/25…
When you consider that a sedentary lifestyle contributes to the causes of erectile dysfunction, watching sports can quite literally make you impotent ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 4 tweets
3 Mar
These talking points are unrolled every few years: "the GOP can win big by embracing mass immigration, if they just soften their hearts!" It never pans out, and relatively small gains are framed as shadings of an illusory red wave to come on the back of mass immigration 1/
How has that worked out for California? The GOP there has basically become the diet Democratic Party. For example, why didn't Reagan's amnesty put California's immigrant population squarely in the GOP corner? "But look at the gains in this county this election!" 2/
Trump made gains with Hispanics, OK--but Trump got a smaller share of their vote than previous GOPers, and this despite him backing off on immigration rhetoric and floating amnesty for DACA and the American Dream plan. Nevertheless, they were decisive in helping Biden win 3/
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!