Over the past couple decades, US labor share of GDP has decreased to being well below trend (left chart), while US corporate profits as a percentage of GDP have increased to being above-trend (right chart).
A thread.
In addition to being partly due to technology/automation, another part of this is due to structural US trade deficits.
The US exported large portions of our supply chains overseas, and foreigners took those dollars and reinvested them back into US equities.
Since the top 1% own 53% of US equities, and the bottom 50% own less than 1% of US equities (and many of them had jobs/wages impacted by offshoring/automation), this trend of declining labor and increasing profits/valuations has favored wealth concentration.
Lately this has expanded to the residential real estate market.
Foreigners now also reinvest their trade surplus dollars into buying US single family homes and renting them back to Americans, collecting income from them.
This structural trade situation is why, despite Europe and Japan having lower interest rates and more QE as a % of GDP than the US, their wealth concentration isn't as high as in the US.
A chart of mean vs median wealth. Numbers via Credit Suisse wealth report:
Americans pay the highest per-capita cost of healthcare in the world.
We also have a higher share of tax dollars spent on military than Europe/Japan, which mostly goes to defending this trade situation that benefits the wealthy over US workers.
Many investors (US and non-US) don't see it, since we're the ones benefiting from it.
However, investors shouldn't be surprised by bouts of populism in the US and elsewhere. The system has been straining for a while now under its own design. Folks push back.
A lot of people like to singularly blame central banks (rates and QE) for wealth concentration since it's easy, but the problem runs a lot deeper and more structural than that.
I keep seeing the chart float around of 23 million government employees, as though that's directly cuttable by the new Department of Government Efficiency.
Keep in mind that 3 million of those are listed as federal and the other 20+ million are state/local.
A thread. 🧵
Now, quantifying the actual federal workforce is actually nontrivial.
-Are we talking civilian, or military too (1.3M)?
-Are we including postal workers (550k)?
Along with Steve Lee @moneyball and Ren @0xren_cf, I co-authored a paper that analyzes the process and risks of how Bitcoin upgrades its consensus rules over time, from a technical & economic perspective.
Bitcoin is hard to change by design, and the methods of how it changes have evolved as the network has grown.
In the paper, we analyze what consensus is, and how different types of entities have different incentives and powers during the course of a potential consensus change.
CPI for November came in this morning. Headline numbers continue to bounce around above 3%, while core continues to gradually decrease. 🧵
Some people assume that the end of inflation means prices go down, but instead it just means the rate of change of prices decreases to the target rate.
There's permanently more money in the system, and prices in aggregate are permanently higher.
Currently, China has weak domestic consumption but strong production/exports, the United States has decent consumption but weak production, and Europe's domestic consumption *and* production are weak.
This weakness weighs on energy prices and other materials.
Since the start of 2020, the United States has taken on $10.7 trillion in new public debt (i.e. accumulated deficits).
That's about $80k per household in four years.
Has your household received that much in deficit spending? Some did, but likely not yours.
Some households received hundreds of thousands or even millions in stimulus.
And a sizable chunk of them were wealthy law firm or investment firm owners, or and various rather large business owners (100s of employees) that were not even disrupted by the pandemic/lockdowns.
Some households received indirect deficit expenditure. For example, if your employer received it, it may have positively affected your job.
But most analysis (e.g. see above tweet) showed that most of the money didn't go to that. It instead pooled near the top.
-The Golden Monarch
-Lord "Uncle" Sam
-The Dragon Emperor
-Archmage Nakamoto
🧵
The Golden Monarch economically defeated all opposition and reigned supreme for thousands of years. Now ancient and wise, and having seen the entirety of history, he contemplates his diminishing role in the modern world and wonders if he could have done anything differently.
Lord Sam, usurper of gold, known merely as “the Uncle” to many, sits at the Cantillon Source and wields the mighty dollar. Liberating in his youth, now oppressive in his age. His monetary power reigns supreme but shows increasing signs of decadence, decay, and defiance.