Prof. Jose-Luis Jimenez Profile picture
Apr 17, 2021 49 tweets 23 min read Read on X
1/ TEN SCIENTIFIC REASONS IN SUPPORT OF AIRBORNE TRANSMISSION OF SARS-CoV-2

Peer-reviewed publication in @TheLancet

An honor to have collaborated in multidisciplinary team across medicine, infectious diseases, epidemiology, aerosol science, sociology

thelancet.com/journals/lance…
2/ The authors are:

- @trishgreenhalgh, Prof. of Medicine at Oxford Univ., pioneer of evidence-based medicine (EBM)
- @DFisman, Prof. at Univ. of Toronto, epidemiologist
- @chipatucsd, Prof. of Medicine at UC-San Diego, Chief Editor of journal "Clinical Infectious Diseases"
3/ The rest of the authors:

- @kprather, Prof. UC-San Diego, member of US National Academies of Science and of Engineering, aerosol scientist
- @zeynep, Prof. Univ. of North Carolina, sociologist
- Yours truly, Prof. Univ. of Colorado, Highly Cited Scientist, aerosol scientist
4/ We review ten different lines of evidence that support that SARS-CoV-2 is predominately airborne

I will review the the lines in this thread, with links to key references, and some additional detail to make it more understandable.
5/ FIRST: lots of superspreading events, & the ones that have been studied in detail are best explained by airborne transmission

To our knowledge NOT a single peer-reviewed pub. of an outbreak reports w/ certainty likely droplet or surface transmission being major
6/ An example is the Skagit Choir case that we investigated (led by @ShellyMBoulder, paper here, read the Supp. Info. for the real details: doi.org/10.1111/ina.12…), that I summarized in this thread:

7/ Some people argue that superspreading events are interesting but minor overall. That is not correct. Superspreading plays a major part on pandemic spread, and controlling SSE is key to control the pandemic, as @nature summarizes here:

nature.com/articles/d4158…
8/ SECOND LINE OF EVIDENCE: growing number of cases of long distance transmission. e.g. in quarantine hotels in Australia and New Zealand:

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27…
9/ Another recently-published case in which an infected person transmitted to several people who were 15 meters BEHIND. Genome sequencing shows that it was the same virus. Video shows that there was no close contact.

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27… Image
10/ Why are most of the long-distance transmission cases being identified in the quarantine hotels in Australia & New Zealand?

Because the lack of community cases makes it much more certain that transmission happened there. (Can't do in US)

Plus there is video surveillance etc
11/ Similarly, airborne transmission of smallpox was debated for centuries, but could only be definitely proven in the complete absence of community transmission

Pakistani electrician arrived in Germany, where there were no cases. Obvious long distance T

academic.oup.com/aje/article/93… Image
12/ THIRD LINE OF EVIDENCE: people w/o symptoms transmit 30-59% of the cases.

They don't cough or sneeze, so they produce very few large droplets. But they go around with their lives and produce lots of aerosols speaking etc.

jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
13/ FOURTH LINE OF EV.: transmission is 20 times more efficient indoors than outdoors.

Same gravity indoors and outdoors, large droplets do the same in either (can't explain difference)

Huge aerosol dilution outdoors vs. trapping indoors can explain it

academic.oup.com/jid/article/22…
14/ FOURTH AND A HALF: ventilation of indoor spaces reduces transmission significantly. This is accepted by e.g. @WHO, which recently published a Roadmap to reduce transmission w/ ventilation.

Ventilation impacts airborne, NOT droplets or surfaces

who.int/publications/i…
15/ I have yet to hear an attempt at explaining why (f large droplets dominate transmission as @WHO and @CDCgov say) there is such a large indoor / outdoor difference in transmission, or such an impact of ventilation.

Strongly implies airborne is PREDOMINANT mode of transmission
16/ FIFTH: studies have demonstrated (e.g. at Harvard Univ. hospital -- BWH) that health care workers were infected despite contact and droplet protections and eye protection. Genomic match

Surgical masks protect well, but not perfectly against aerosols

acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.73… Image
17/ SIXTH: viable SARS-CoV-2 virus has been detected in the air from two hospitals and a car where infected person was present.

And this has NEVER been achieved for measles or tuberculosis, two accepted airborne diseases.

ijidonline.com/article/S1201-… Image
18/ SEVENTH LINE OF EVIDENCE: virus material has been detected via PCR on HVAC ducts and filters of a hospital. It could only have gotten there if it was floating in the air as an aerosol.

nature.com/articles/s4159… Image
19/ EIGHTH LINE OF EVIDENCE: airborne transmission has been demonstrated with animal models such as ferrets and hamsters.

nature.com/articles/s4146… Image
20/ Of note is that demonstration of airborne transmission with an animal model (guinea pigs) by Richard Riley and Williams Wells in 1961 is what led to the acceptance that tuberculosis was transmitted through the air, after 5 decades of denial.

atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/ar…
21/ NINTH: no published studies with strong evidence that contradicts airborne transmission.

There are cases of shared air w/o transmission, but they are easily explained by very large variation in virus emission among people & in time, + ventilation

ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EH… Image
22/ Some people argue that R0 would be higher if SARS-CoV-2 was airborne

But tuberculosis is only airborne, and is less contagious than COVID

And R0 is very skewed, many don't transmit, a few transmit a lot (consistent w/ aerosols w/ variable emission): wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-67
23/ We dispel the myth about R0, as well as other commonly-held myths about airborne transmission in this article in the Journal of Hospital Infection, led by prominent virologist Julian Tang:
sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
24/ TENTH: there is limited evidence to support that another route of transmission is dominant (or I add, even important).

Surfaces: @CDCgov and multiple literature studies have been clear that surface transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is rare:

cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
25/ Here the Editors of @nature were practically yelling (on 2-Feb) to @WHO and @CDCgov to say clearly that surfaces transmit little, and that surface disinfection is not important, and efforts should focus on the air.

nature.com/articles/d4158…
26/ There is also no clear evidence of large droplet transmission.

Ease of transmission in close proximity has been attributed (erroneously, see next) since 1910 to large droplets, which fall to the ground in 1-2 m

@WHO video illustrates it perfectly:

27/ But this is an error! Modern science shows that if a disease is transmitted easily in close proximity while talking, and social distance reduces transmission, that is explained mainly by short-range airborne transmission, and NOT by droplets.

sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Image
28/ Ease of transmission in close proximity (along with cases of lack of transmission in shared air, see tweet #21) was used for 7 decades to declare measles a droplet / fomite disease, and to deny its airborne character.

pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/75/4/6… Image
29/ In fact, droplet transmission has NEVER been demonstrated directly for ANY disease in entire history of medicine

(From a review of the literature by Prof. Yuguo Li et al. in this paper: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…. If you have a paper that proves otherwise, pls send it my way) Image
30/ So how did ease of infection in close proximity come of be interpreted as PROOF of droplet transmission and evidence against airborne transmission?

Charles Chapin was a prominent American Public Health researcher, 1927 president of American PH Ass.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_V… Image
31/ In his 1910 seminar book, "The Sources and Modes of Infection" (archive.org/details/source…), Chapin misinterpreted the earlier measurements of Flugge in 1890s.

Fluggle waited 5 hrs for aerosols to settle on plates. But got distorted into "sprayborne droplets" by Chapin.
32/ Chapin through contact infection was most important. But observed:

"it is impossible, as I know from experience, to teach people to avoid contact infection while they are firmly convinced that the air is the chief vehicle of infection"

Airborne trans. was getting in his way Image
33/ He admits that there is no clear evidence against airborne transmission, as aerosol measurements were not developed yet.

Still proceeds to "discard airborne infection.":

"It will be a great relief to most persons to be freed from the specter of infected air"
34/ Unfortunately Chapin is too successful. And even though there was not evidence to show that close contact transmission was explained by Chapin's "sprayborne droplets", this became a tradition and a dogma.

#DropletDogma
35/ Airborne trans. denied for decades. Wells (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F…), Riley fight back.

First director of CDC (A. Langmuir) makes fun of Wells in 1950 for thinking that ANY natural disease can be airborne

We have just submitted a paper on this history, preprint out next wk
36/ Eventually the evidence becomes undeniable for a few diseases: TB in 1961 (short story: atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.11…), and later for measles and chickenpox.

Note that in 1985 still most public health authorities described measles as droplet/fomite (pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/75/4/6…)
37/ Incidentally, measles and chickenpox were accepted as airborne with A LOT less evidence than we have now for COVID-19.

(From: ) Image
38/ Airborne transmission is considered very very difficult, little attention devoted to it.

So huge errors (the size of Godzilla) creep into the description of droplets and aerosols in medical textbooks, such as 5 um being the separation (it is 100)

39/ We already knew in 1934 (from Wells' work at Harvard academic.oup.com/aje/article-ab…) that droplets vs. aerosols boundary was at 100 microns.

Reaffirmed by @theNASEM and @ScienceMagazine: science.sciencemag.org/content/370/65…
40/ Back to @TheLancet: "There is consistent, strong evidence that SARS-CoV-2 spreads by airborne trans. Although other routes can contribute, we believe that the airborne route is likely to b dominant. The public health community should act accordingly and without further delay" Image
41/ If I missed something, if you think there is an error, if you think there is evidence we are not considering, send it my way.

If you know of a paper that reviews as much evidence and explains why it is really droplets, definitely send it my way (haven't seen any).
Typo: messed up Kim Prather's handle in tweet #3, it is @kprather88
44/ OK, so it's airborne, how do we protect ourselves better?

See our scientists FAQs at Tinyurl.com/faqs-aerosol
45/ Reaction from higher ups in large Public Health agency (confidentially thru colleague)

They still don't think it's airborne, based on these considerations:

- there are still not enough good masks
- ventilation changes would be expensive

Not a joke, this is what I was told
46/ So far the @TheLancet piece seems to be having a high impact, thanks to everyone for bringing attention to it.

altmetric.com/details/103982… Image
48/ And this is an 11th reason why SARS-COV-2 airborne transmission is dominant: likelihood of anisotropic infection (aerosols infect at much lower doses than droplets). It had not been published when we wrote @TheLancet publication.

Our @TheLancet paper laying out evidence that airborne transmission is predominant for SARS-CoV-2 keeps having a huge impact. Altmetric score above 17000 (altmetric.com/details/103982…)

If you have not read it yet, it is short, easy to read, and free online:

thelancet.com/journals/lance… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Jose-Luis Jimenez

Prof. Jose-Luis Jimenez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jljcolorado

May 26
1/ Survey of CO2 indoors during trip

CO2 (above ~400 ppm outdoors) indicates the amount of exhaled air (& virus) trapped in a space

Also per recent scientific results by @ukhadds, CO2 helps SARS-CoV stay infectious in air much longer

@united flight boarding, pretty terrible! Image
2/ This is the trip so far:

-Low outdoors
-Pretty high ~2000 in @RideRTD bus to airport
- ok ~800 at @DENAirport, except restroom ~1500. Not sure why restrooms at this airport are so often poorly ventilated
- Then boarding on @united, ventilation OFF, so huge increase till ON Image
3/ For details of the recent results on how and why CO2 makes SARS-CoV-2 stay infectious much longer in the air, see this recent thread by @ukhadds

Read 9 tweets
May 8
1/ "After four years of fighting about it, @WHO has finally proclaimed that viruses, including the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID, can be spread through the air"



By @maggiemfoxscientificamerican.com/article/a-figh…
2/ "It took four years to get here because some leaders in public health, medicine and science clung too tightly to precision and semantics"

"One particular moment of shame came on March 28, 2020, when WHO tweeted: “FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne.”

3/ "Words matter. When people heard that COVID might spread on surfaces, they wasted time wiping down groceries. People who misunderstood airborne spread needlessly wore masks on outdoor walks and veered off sidewalks to avoid their neighbors."
Read 7 tweets
Apr 18
1/ @WHO has published a report on updated terminology for disease transmission

I've seen some debate about it. My take:

- Terminology itself is ok. Big progress
- But no recommendations of how to protect!

Report:

Press release: who.int/publications/m…
who.int/news/item/18-0…
2/ The report was likely the result of intense pressure on @WHO during the pandemic:

- They denied that #COVIDIsAirborne on March 2020
- They finally accepted it 2 years later

nature.com/articles/d4158…
@WHO 3/ To their credit, @WHO did invite some of their critics to be part of the committee.

What was the terminology before. In medical circles:

- droplet transmission: if it happened in close proximity, or if particles were > 5 microns

- airborne transmission: if it happened far
Read 34 tweets
Mar 28
1/ New paper in @ScienceMagazine: "Mandating Indoor Air Quality for Public Buildings"

Explaining current status of indoor air quality standards (in short: bad or non-existent), the huge health benefits that would arise from them & proposing a path forward
science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
Image
2/ "People living in urban & industrialized societies, which are expanding globally, spend more than 90% of time indoors, breathing indoor air (IA)."

"Most countries do NOT have legislated indoor air quality (IAQ) performance standards for public spaces"

science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
3/ "Few building codes address operation, maintenance, and retrofitting, and most do NOT focus on airborne disease transmission."

"We propose that Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) standards be mandatory for public spaces"

science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…
Read 14 tweets
Oct 4, 2023
1/ Checking the ventilation by measuring CO2 as I travel to the #AAAR2023 conference

@RideRTD bus to Denver airport. Bus route had started 3 min before I got in, already 1500 ppm

Typical of these @RideRTD buses, poor ventilation Image
2/ Not getting any better as time passes in the @rideRTD bus to the airport...

7% of the air is being re-breathed, it has already been in someone else lungs when each of us breathe it. Image
@RideRTD 3/ Given the often poor-to-mediocre ventilation in US transportation systems, I wear N95 masks (not KN95, less good)

In this case @3M VFlex, which I tested at 99.99% filtration for myself

It also stays sealed when I talk, doesn't distort my speech (& add to my Spanish accent) Image
Read 14 tweets
Oct 2, 2023
1/ Video de mi presentación sobre "Transmisión de enfermedades por el aire: cómo funciona, por qué se malentendió, y cómo reducirla"

como parte de la presentación del libro de ventilación de @aireamos

2/ Las diapositivas se pueden bajar de este enlace.

(Son de una charla más larga así que tienen más detalles, pero están todas las de la presentación de @Aireamos)

drive.google.com/file/d/1Bs0RRG…
@aireamos 3/ Miguel Ángel Campano @MA_Campano y @Aireamos han sido los motores del libro de ventilación:

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(