Trent Telenko Profile picture
Apr 18, 2021 17 tweets 8 min read Read on X
The US Naval Institute is commemorating the survival of the USS Laffey at Okinawa Picket Station #1.

This thread is about a critical planning mistake the USS Laffey crew paid for with their lives
1/
The day USS Laffey was attacked, 16 April 1945, was also the day that the island of Ie Shima, off Okinawa, was invaded by the 77th Infantry Division.
2/
history.navy.mil/content/histor… Image
The full panoply of amphibious firepower from air and sea also required a huge part of the radio spectrum to control.

USN warships, USN rocket & mortar gunboats and strafing planes each required separate radio frequencies.
3/ Image
The SCR-522 used on USMC F4U Corsairs protecting USS Laffey only had four frequencies.

Most USN planes had newer radios with 10 frequencies. Whether they used four or 10 frequencies, both radios used polished quartz crystals. There were not
4/

radiomuseum.co.uk/scr522.html Image
...enough crystals of the right frequency types for picket DD's like USS Laffey, USMC low level Corsair CAP & to run the landing at Ie Shima at the same time due to a planning mistake by USMC Gen Oliver P. Smith.

He didn't bring enough staff officers.
5/
What that meant for USS Laffey come 16 Apr 1945, per John F. Wukovits' "Hell from the Heavens: The Epic Story of the USS Laffey and World War II's Greatest Kamikaze Attack" is the radio channels to control F4U CAP were filled with chatter from the Ie Shima landing air strikes
6/ Image
There simply was not enough staff officer hours between Dec 1944, when Tactical Air Force-Tenth Army was stood up and the late Mar 1945 landing at Kerama Retto to consider more quartz crystal supplies to support picket DD's. USMC fighters were to provide close air support,
7/ Image
not to protect picket DD's for a landing operation that was supposed to last 30 days...

...except the operation lasted 82 days.

Opps.
8/ ImageImageImage
While the 16 Apr 1945 Ie Shima invasion may have been one of the peak radio traffic days of the 82 day Okinawa campaign.

There were others nearly as bad, as radio directed artillery, naval gunfire & air strikes ground down Japanese positions.
9/ ImageImageImageImage
It's only by reading Richard J. Thompson Jr's "Crystal Clear: The Struggle for Reliable Communications Technology in World War II" that you can fully appreciate in full 4000K digital glory the screw up Gen. Smith's shorting TAF-10 staff officers caused
amazon.com/Crystal-Clear-…
10/
The cliff notes for Okinawa from Crystal Clear are this:
Imperfections in the cutting, grinding, & polishing of radio grade quartz crystals caused spikes to grow on these crystals that changed their resonant radio frequency.

This was called "aging."
11/ Image
The more A/C missions quartz crystal radios flew. The faster the crystals aged.

The US Army Signal Corps was going crazy about this until their inspectors spotted that one of their contractor's crystals didn't have this problem.
12/ Image
This contractor acid etched their crystals after cutting, grinding & polishing as a proprietary process.

Much drama & cash flow was involved with that fact, but the fix for the installed base of military radios were Signal Corps grinding teams with acid etch capability.
12/ Image
This is where Gen. O.P. Smith's shorting TAF-10 staff officer needs grew consequences like compound interest.

No shipping space was given for a Signal Corps crystal grinding team. USMC fighter and USN float plane sorties caused a backlog of 5,000 radio oscillator crystals
13/ Image
...by the end of the Operation Iceberg campaign.

It's unclear, who beyond the crew of USS Laffey, suffered preventable deaths from Gen. O.P. Smith's staff officer mistake driven communications problems.
13/ Image
The one thing General Oliver P. Smith did prove as Assistant Chief of Staff Tenth Army was don't send the Navy & Marines to do a US Army Air Force job.

/End Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

Aug 19
I've gotten a lot of comments on this thread here and via DM. I'm going to share one from a Cold War gray beard on the engine that powers the FP-5.

"FP-5 is around 4 x Tomahawk in mass.

FP-5 Engine🧵
...With a similar configuration, drag will not be dominated by lift induced wing drag but will form drag which is typical for 500 knots air speed jets and missiles with low aspect ratio wings.

2/
...So a rule of thumb estimate is that you will need around 4 x the thrust of a Tomahawk F107-WR-402 700 lbf (3.1 kN) engine for an FP-5 Flamingo GLCM.

3/
Read 7 tweets
Aug 19
Slowly, with a lot of notice, Trump is morphing into Pres. Biden

This territorial concession malarkey is exactly what the Biden Administration was playing games with in Nov 2021 via an op-ed by Samuel Charap of RAND in the Nov 19, 2021 Politico.

1/
That Op-Ed advocated, in effect, that the US abandon Ukraine to Russia in exchange for other concessions by Russia, greenlighting Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

It was understood in Nov. 2021 era DC that Charap...


2/rand.org/pubs/commentar…
...was Jake Sullivan's totem animal for surfacing ideas of "de-escalation" with Russia.

Former Estonian President Ilves and Prof Stephan Blank utterly shredded the Charap/Sullivan thought balloon.

Seeing Trump revive that Charap/Sullivan thought ballon now is sickening🤮

3/3 Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 18
The issue for Russia with the FP-5 is that its range makes Russian national air defense practically impossible.

Ukraine can reach facilities on the other side of the Urals and north to Murmansk with the FP-5.

Once Ukrainian drones overwhelm a border SAM battery sector.

1/ Image
FP-5's sent through the drone peak saturation area can 'squirt through into a great empty' low at high subsonic speeds.

Only an AWACS with late production SU-30 with look down/shoot down PESA radars can deal with them.

H/T @DrnBmbr
2/ Image
Furthermore, FP-5's are going to have electronic counter measures (ECM) and counter-countermeasures (ECCM) installed as standard.

The FP-5 will have at least a 24 element CRPA element layout to beat GPS jamming...

3/
Read 5 tweets
Aug 12
Pres Zelenskyy of Ukraine just made an interesting statement:

"Let me give an example from yesterday, roughly like this: the Russians suffer about a thousand losses per day — that’s 500 killed and 500 wounded.

1/
I’m not even counting the 10 prisoners and so on. More precisely, 968 losses for Russia: 531 killed, 428 wounded, and 9 captured.

We had 340 losses in one day: 18 killed, 243 wounded, and 79 missing in action," he said."

2/
500 Russian KIA versus 18 Ukrainian KIA is a 29.5 to one ratio in favor of Ukraine.

Total Russian casualties of 1,000 versus 340 Ukrainian is a 2.9 to one ratio in favor of Ukraine.

3/
Read 5 tweets
Aug 12
Actually, the Soviet Union in the "Great Patriotic War" did suffer worse casualties and win.

It is that fact which powers the "Russian WW2 exceptionalism" myth that Putin used to zombify Russians over 20 years to make suicidal assaults over and over again.

1/
I said something like what Chuck just said about Russian casualties in July 2024.

Chuck now, like I did then, underestimates how powerful cultural conditioning is in making armies able to take horrific losses and continue.

2/
As long a Putin's propaganda keeps Russians believing they are winning by taking miniscule slivers of Ukrainian land.

The Russians will keep coming.

It doesn't mean Russia will win. It means Russia is paying a disproportionate blood debt which will have to be paid.

3/
Read 17 tweets
Aug 11
The map below underlines a real innumeracy issue with lots of Western analysts of Ukraine's OWA drone strategic bombing campaign.

BLUF: 40,000/52 weeks is ~769 Ukrainian OWA drones launched a week on average for the whole year.

Ukrainian OWA Drone🧵
1/
Historic war mobilization production curves are heavily back loaded.

That is, the production rates of B-17's and B-24's bombers in the 3rd quarter of 1943 versus the 3rd quarter of 1944 showed a much higher production rate in late 1944.

2/ Image
Image
We are mid-way through the 3rd quarter of the 2025 where Ukraine's OWA drone annual production goal was 40,000.

Ukraine should be around 850-950 OWA drones a week in August 2025 and will be close to 1,200 a week in the 4th qtr. of the 2025.

3/
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(