THREAD:
So you're running the U.S. economy.
Q: How big should the U.S. budget deficit be?
A: Bigger than the trade deficit, to avoid crises.
Not expecting that answer? Wondering why? Learn about one of the coolest economic concepts, the sector balances. 1/
There are 3 sectors described by CBO: 1. Govt: The federal budget balance. 2. Foreign: The current account, roughly equal to the trade balance plus some investment-related $ flows. 3. Private: Household savings minus business investment. 2/ cbo.gov/publication/54…
Government sector: CBO uses the federal budget deficit as its measure. In 2020, the U.S. ran a 15% GDP budget deficit; it had been 2.4% in 2014 (about historical average) and increased to 4.6% in 2019. 3/
The foreign sector is the U.S. current account balance (mostly trade plus some investment flows) multiplied by -1, as we view it from the foreigners' perspective. A U.S. trade or current account deficit is a foreign surplus. It has been about 3% GDP for a decade. 4/
The third sector is the private sector, saving minus investment.* It was in deficit from 2002 to 2008, then reversed dramatically in the Great Recession.
*CBO includes state & local government budget balances here, as they use federal budget as government to simplify. 5/
Putting them all into one graph, we see the first graph in the thread again. Note that the 3 balances in 2020 add to zero, as they do each and every year. This is a mathematical identity (equation that must hold true) based on how the sectors are defined. 6/
Yes, you read that correctly. The sum is always zero. Here is the data table used to create the chart, and a handy FRED link for the chart and data. 7/
tps://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=549449
Looking at the equations in the table in graphic form, you basically have the federal government spending $ into the private sector and removing $ via taxation. You don't want the private sector in deficit (i.e., accumulating debt) for very long; bad things happen... 8/
...like the GR in 2008. Private sector ran sizable deficits in the decade prior, borrowing via foreign surplus and was forced to stop borrowing suddenly and deleverage. Note this drove the government deficit up to maintain the identity. 9/ levyinstitute.org/publications/s…
Trump's goal of lowering the trade deficit and increasing the budget deficit via tax cuts were not compatible. If the red line moves farther from zero, the sum of the blue and green lines must shift up; people spend extra money injected by government on imports too. 10/
Here is a quiz you can use to see if you got it; solutions on next tweet. 11/
Quiz solutions: 12/
So why should the U.S. run a budget deficit larger than the trade deficit (foreign surplus)? Because that's what it takes to have a private sector surplus. You want government steadily injecting money into the private sector, at a level that doesn't create inflation. 13/
If the U.S. takes its trade deficit (~foreign surplus) of 3% GDP as a given, then the budget deficit has to be at least 3% GDP so private sector in surplus. That's the floor. The goal is not a budget surplus.
🧵The MSM created 4 fake crises (Inflation, Immigration, Housing, and Crime), which helped Trump get elected while hiding record prosperity. Here are slides explaining the counter-arguments to such misinformation, plus a few charts and links included for more details. 1/
Facts regarding the false narratives on housing and crime. 2/
Wages & Inflation should be reported in context. Purchasing power is what matters.
☑️Wages have outgrown inflation.
☑️Real (inflation-adjusted) wages have always been higher than 2019 during 2021-2024.
☑️Biden has the highest avg. real wages among the last 11 presidents. 3/
🧵President Biden's economic legacy, in charts. First, the unemployment rate at 4.1% on average is the lowest (best) among the last 14 presidents, for FRED data back to 1948. 1/
The real (infl-adj) hourly wages for production & non-supervisory workers (the bottom 80% of the private sector) averaged higher under Biden than the last 11 presidents. In other words, workers had more purchasing power under Biden than other presidents, despite inflation. 2/
Taking the first two charts together, Biden has the best combination of unemployment and real wages among the last 11 presidents. This is the best reading on the "Prosperity Matrix" of any modern president. 3/
🧵Monthly economic update, through November:
First, job creation was +227,000 jobs, or +283,000 after upward adjustments to Sept & Oct. We're now +16.4 million jobs from when Biden started and +7.0 million vs. pre-pandemic peak regained in June 2022. 1/
🏆Biden is the only president with positive job creation every month in office.
No matter how you slice and adjust it, job creation is much faster under Biden than Trump:
The unemployment rate increased by 0.1% in November, to 4.2%. The historical average back to 1948 is 5.7%. The 2022 & 2023 annual average of 3.6% was lower than Trump's best of 3.7% in 2019. The last 3.5% year was 1969. 3/
🧵How Democrats should talk about the economy, in plain language:
1. Biden has the lowest unemployment rate on average among the last 11 presidents.
2. Workers have the highest real hourly wages (purchasing power) on average under Biden, despite inflation. 1/
If you want job creation, elect a Democrat president. Amazingly, 98% of job creation since 1989 was under Democratic presidents, 50 million to 1 million.
If you pretend the pandemic didn't happen and charge Bush 43 for the 2009 jobs losses, you get 46 to 6. 2/
Biden delivered an incredibly low unemployment rate, best among the last 11 presidents as mentioned. The unemployment rate averaged 3.6% in both 2022 and 2023. Trump's best was 3.7% in 2019. You have to go back to 1969 for a 3.5% year. 3/
"Wages have outgrown inflation so you're better off" should have been the party line from the start. Too often, Democrats apologized for the price level, or talked about how the inflation rate was slowing. 2/
Democrats also got caught arguing about "Border Security" as opposed to saying "Immigrants make us all richer" or "Boomers retiring in droves means we need lots of immigrant workers." Trump blocked meaningful bi-partisan reform. 3/
@RadioFreeTom Biden's first term was the most successful economically since the late 1960's. Wages, net worth, stocks, GDP and housing far outgrew inflation. The 3.6% unemployment rates in 2022 & 2023 were better than 2019 at 3.7%. Biden's job creation much faster no matter how it's sliced.