When one joins the Civil Service, one enters the membership of a club.

A club with traditions, good and bad, going back centuries.

Its past members include Sir Geoffrey Chaucer, Sir Thomas More, Thomas Cromwell and Samuel Pepys.

Truly one stands on the shoulders of giants.
And it is a club one never leaves, even on exiting the employment of the Civil Service.

The code of omerta still very much applies, even in retirement.

GOD these days, in that other place, those Elysian Fields, sets us a good example.
Hodges, when you smear one of us, you insult all of us.

We are not journalists we are a family.
We have our differences, our feuds, some lost in the mists of time, because we possess what columnists do not, an institutional memory.

When the world crashed down around the ears of Government in 1914 and 1939, our forebears did their bit and more.
This Tory Government wants to return the Civil Service to the unreformed days of the early 19th Century wherein Ministers might appoint friends, family and acquaintances not to the role of Special Advisers, but to jobs on the Civil Service payroll.
Conservative and Liberal Governments during the reign of Queen Victoria put an end to that scandal and corruption.

All hail Northcote-Trevelyan.

civilservant.org.uk/library/1854_N…
No, the Civil Service is not perfect, ask any current or former civil servant, off the record, and they will confirm that.
What institution is beyond criticism or evolutionary reform, except, in their own opinion, the hacks of the Fourth Estate?
As I say, we are a family.

Some of our past forebears came up with Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty wherein is set out the principle of collective defence.
Or, as Sir Humphrey would, I am sure, put it, "Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno."

Bring it on, Hodges!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Hazard 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🇺🇳

Mark Hazard 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 🇺🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MarkHazard2020

16 Apr
Having read the Blueprint for Children’s Social Care John Seddon wrote the following letter to people listed as interviewees. Tis relevant to note that every reply John received stated clearly interviewee did not concur with the report’s recommendations.

thefrontline.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
"I’m writing to you because you were listed as an interviewee in A Blueprint for Children’s Social Care: Unlocking the potential of social work. Your listing as interviewee suggests you might concur with the report’s recommendations, but I am aware some of the interviewees don't.
I read the Blueprint owing to reading about the controversy surrounding its authorship in Private Eye. My first concern was that the Blueprint portrayed the UK pilots of Buurtzorg as successful.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!