Journalism is partly about framing what is and is not important. We have some journalists who have made a whole beat on stories of excess campus wokeness, but its hard to think of anyone who has done the same on stories of state power policing campus speech, which are more impt
There are journalists who report on, for example, bills that restrict speech on campus, but who do not see their job as critiquing them. And there are some academics who try to make sense of these trends and explain the risks to free speech, e.g.
Some opinion people will write on this topic occasionally, but it's not their main beat, e.g. @michelleinbklyn @zackbeauchamp. But there isn't a whole cohort of writers/podcasters on the topic of state threats to campus speech in the way there is for the anti-wokeness brigade.
Some anti-woke journalists might tweet that a bill in FL is counterproductive, but its not what they write about. And the anti-wokeness brigade are supplemented by well-funded niche conservative media like Campus Reform and the big boys like Fox & WSJ theintercept.com/2021/04/10/cam…
If you are a casual media user, you have been exposed to the claim that campus wokeness is a fundamental threat to society, but you probably know little about much bigger threat of the state censoring speech.
Thats bad.
@JeffreyASachs puts it like this: medium.com/arc-digital/th…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Don Moynihan

Don Moynihan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @donmoyn

18 Apr
This is really great: USCIS is seeking public input on how to minimize administrative burdens for immigrants. Please share widely! federalregister.gov/documents/2021…
If you've been paying any attention to immigration over the last few years, you know the Trump admin has been using administrative barriers to make even legal processes impossible to access. See, for example, work by @crampell washingtonpost.com/opinions/lette…
See also this piece by @stillsarita: While the Trump admin emphasized the need for legal immigration, they did everything they could to shut down those legal processes under a mountain of red tape. newyorker.com/magazine/2021/…
Read 7 tweets
18 Apr
We’ve gone pretty quickly from “please wear a mask even when outdoors” to “those people wearing masks outdoors are obnoxious freaks”
We have a population that is far from fully vaccinated and the new variants are more contagious. I don’t think we are quite at the point where we should be shaming people if they decide to wear masks.
We are at a delicate moment where people are renegotiating the space around them - eg trying to discover which friends are vaccinated. The CDC has been said if everyone is vaccinated, no need for masks. If you are outdoors it’s likely fine. Short of that, still some uncertainty.
Read 4 tweets
16 Apr
This is bad. There is a pent-up demand of refugees who have been waiting for years.
Not sure about this framing. Have not seen any Biden supporters argue that low refugees numbers is an enlightened policy now that Biden is doing it: indeed, most of the pushback on this policy I’ve seen is coming from liberals who presumably voted for him
There are aspects of the immigration discussion where Biden has probably been unfairly treated e.g. the very real problem of what to do with unaccompanied minors. But the refugee cap does not fall into that category as best as I can tell. (but correct me if I'm wrong).
Read 6 tweets
16 Apr
This is really insightful piece about the abuse of language on the right. What does language like "cancel culture" do in these cases?
1. As @ParkerMolloy identifies, it provides easy talking points - "rhetorical empty calories" mediamatters.org/fox-news/woke-…
2. Use of terms like "cancel culture" connects and makes sense of disparate events into coherent themes for people, reducing cognitive demands on the audience.
3. It prioritizes certain topics as more worthy of your attention, and gives them a specific framing.
4. As a result terms "cancel culture" or "woke" or "critical race theory" creates a cognitive bias - don't think about it, or look at the details, just turn to a pre-programmed emotional response (usually anger).
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
“I am recognized as a world level expert” is definitely something that actual experts say in legislative testimony
What is odd is the appeal to academic authority by someone who routinely attacks academia, best summed up by the claim that he spends 16 hours a day studying the relevant academic literature, when he really means he spends 16 hours a day trolling academics & others
The meta-narrative of the Sokal Squared folks is that people in some areas of academia were making ideological claims while wearing the credibility of expertise that their academic status provided them. But Lindsay et al do the same: they are activists pretending to be experts.
Read 4 tweets
13 Apr
Ron DeSantis wants to impose signature matches on absentee ballots. This will predictably result in lots of eligible voters losing their voting rights. The variance in DeSantis own signature over time illustrates why it is such a bad idea. tampabay.com/news/florida-p…
There is no evidence that signature matches reduce fraud, and plenty of evidence that they result in legitimate votes being tossed, esp. by younger, immigrant & minority voters more. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Signatures are collected in really varying conditions. Your vote could be rejected if the signature you made w an electronic stylus at the DMV is different from one you did at home with a pen on paper.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!