Update from this morning at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry:
- Former resident Lee Chapman describes efforts to complain about gas pipe installation in tower's communal staircase
So this morning we've heard from the first resident witness from this part of the inquiry, Lee Chapman - former secretary of the Grenfell Tower Leaseholders Association. He lived on the 22nd floor with his partner Naomi Li.
Primarily, his evidence focused on GTLA's complaints about work from 2016 onwards to install new gas pipes through the tower's staircase. This work was carried out by the National Grid and was separate to the refurbishment of the tower by Rydon et al
He learned about the works when he saw workers drilling holes through concrete to fit the pipes - and he was immediately worried about 'boxing in' to protect the pipes, something he felt had been done poorly for the recently installed communal hot water pipes.
GTLA picked this up in March 2017, calling for an independent inspector to check that the works being carried out were safe. Vice chair Tunde Awoderu's email contained a warning that "if there was a gas leak and someone was smoking... that would be the end of the building"
Mr Chapman followed this with emails to Millicent Williams, estate manager, writing to tell her: "I am seriously concerned about how I will get out of this building alive in the event of a fire with this added risk". Further emails sent to other TMO/RBKC managers through March.
The complaint is dealt with by TMO's Anthony Cheyne at stage one, and a response sent on 5 May 2017. Declines to put independent adjudicator in place, saying TMO has liased with fire brigade and its independent fire consultant (Carl Stokes) on the matter
GTLA follow up, escalating complaint to stage two and asking for copies of reports. They did not receive them. On 6 June, Peter Maddison of KCTMO responds. Says works are responsibility of National Grid, but as works are not complete will seek professional assurance when they are
Conclusion of Phase 1 was impact of gas in fire "appears to have been minimal", although flames did not stop until supply was shut off. Moore-Bick did say "works associated with the installation of the new gas riser were incomplete and may have contributed to the spread of smoke"
Mr Chapman also gives evidence about the replacement of his flat door, which the couple did themselves in 2016. Says they were told by TMO it needed to have 30 minutes fire resistance which he ensured it did but not that it needed a self-closer. Also says...
... no one from the TMO came to check it following installation. After lunch we will hear from David Collins, who was chair of the residents group (known as 'the compact') during the main refurbishment.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
To those who have recently watched the Netflix documentary on Grenfell, here's a quick run down of issues which still haven't changed since the fire:
Dangerous cladding - while most of the tall buildings with the same material as Grenfell have had it removed, an estimated 10,000 others still have dangerous facades of other types, causing misery for residents
In opposition, Labour promised a major effort to address this - including a taskforce assigned to prioritise and fix buildings. In power, it has adopted a much more limited approach - the same strategy as the Conservatives followed with additional threats to building owners
If anyone has watched the Netflix documentary on Grenfell and is looking for further reading, I've made all my posts on summarising the inquiry report free to read.
New: US bosses at cladding firm which sold material for use on Grenfell knew it was unsafe and knew it was being sold for use on the tower, newly released emails reveal
A cache of emails, which supported an attempt by bereaved and survivors to sue Arconic in the US, have been unsealed following a request by the team researching a Grenfell documentary, due to be released on Netflix this week
Arconic say they were among the docs provided to the Met police and inquiry - but they have never previously been in the public domain. Until now.
Govt lays out plans to accelerate remediation of unsafe buildings:
- Target of 2029 for completion of all above 18m buildings
- All 11m-18m to have a plan by 2029
- Developers to double the pace of remediation of former blocks
- Fines for freeholders who 'sit on their hands'
The plan is apparently going to be backed by investment in enforcement, so that councils, fire authorities and the building safety regulator can step in where buildings aren't being fixed
There are 4,834 buildings around England which have been identified as having unsafe cladding, and an estimated 9,000 in total. So far 1,436 have completed - 30% of those identified and 15% of the probable overall number
Ah christ, I can't even begin with this one, but I do feel the need to say that the paragraph below is demonstrably and very clearly total bullshit. The report quite firmly found the opposite
The report does note that the Fire Safety Order was excluded from the red tape challenge in 2012, but *the building regulations relating to fire safety* were not. This is critically important, because that's where the failures were
Pickles made this argument under evidence (both exempt) and the report specifically rejects it, saying it "served only to reveal the limits of his understanding"
In 1999, a fire at Garnock Court, Irving, Scotland ripped up plastic panels on the outside of a tower block. This came eight years after a similar fire in Knowsley, Merseyside and resulted in a Select Committee inquiry into the risk of cladding fires.
Said Select Committee took evidence and made numerous recommendations. These included:
- All cladding systems to be either non-combustible or justified by large-scale test
- Review of existing cladding systems and periodic risk assessment of them by social landlords