To those who have recently watched the Netflix documentary on Grenfell, here's a quick run down of issues which still haven't changed since the fire: Dangerous cladding - while most of the tall buildings with the same material as Grenfell have had it removed, an estimated 10,000 others still have dangerous facades of other types, causing misery for residents

If anyone has watched the Netflix documentary on Grenfell and is looking for further reading, I've made all my posts on summarising the inquiry report free to read.

Links in the thread below: ‘Its failures had catastrophic consequences’

Architects Studio E

peteapps.substack.com/publish/post/1…

New: US bosses at cladding firm which sold material for use on Grenfell knew it was unsafe and knew it was being sold for use on the tower, newly released emails reveal

thetimes.com/uk/london/arti… A cache of emails, which supported an attempt by bereaved and survivors to sue Arconic in the US, have been unsealed following a request by the team researching a Grenfell documentary, due to be released on Netflix this week

Govt lays out plans to accelerate remediation of unsafe buildings:

- Target of 2029 for completion of all above 18m buildings
- All 11m-18m to have a plan by 2029
- Developers to double the pace of remediation of former blocks
- Fines for freeholders who 'sit on their hands' The plan is apparently going to be backed by investment in enforcement, so that councils, fire authorities and the building safety regulator can step in where buildings aren't being fixed

Ah christ, I can't even begin with this one, but I do feel the need to say that the paragraph below is demonstrably and very clearly total bullshit. The report quite firmly found the opposite

https://twitter.com/David_Cameron/status/1832101537532817898

The report does note that the Fire Safety Order was excluded from the red tape challenge in 2012, but *the building regulations relating to fire safety* were not. This is critically important, because that's where the failures were

*Sighs*

*Opens mental draw marked 'New Labour's responsibility for Grenfell'*

Begins thread...

https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/1831792494012473663

In 1999, a fire at Garnock Court, Irving, Scotland ripped up plastic panels on the outside of a tower block. This came eight years after a similar fire in Knowsley, Merseyside and resulted in a Select Committee inquiry into the risk of cladding fires.

🚨 Grenfell Inquiry report 🚨

- "Complacent" govt "well aware" of risk of cladding disaster but failed to act
- "Systematic dishonesty" by product manufacturers "very significant reason" for fire
- "Chronic and systemic" fire safety failures by tower's social landlords Sections on govt reject the evidence of Lord Eric Pickles and severely criticise the "profound" failure to act after the Lakanal House coroner's inquest in 2013 - which it links directly to the deregulatory agenda of govt

insidehousing.co.uk/news/complacen…

Been at the Met Police briefing on Grenfell investigation:

- Charging files will not go to prosecutors until 2026
- Decision on charges not until end of 2026
- Trials will not start for at least six months after that

Will be over a decade after fire before anyone is in court Offences under investigation are corporate manslaughter, gross negligence manslaughter, perverting the course of justice, misconduct in a public office, serious fraud and various health and safety and fire/building act offences

London Fire Brigade says it has completed all 29 of the recommendations made at the end of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry's first phase - overall good news, but some additional thoughts

londonfire-newsroom.prgloo.com/news/london-fi… A major philosophical thrust of the Phase One recs was to ensure a 'Plan B' exists if a building designed for 'stay put' failed in the future. Continuing to rely on this strategy for so long was a major and tragic part of the reason why the number of fatalities was so high...

I don't know if, when or why Grenfell and the building safety scandal will 'break through' in the way the Post Office Scandal has. But I'm confident if it does the reaction will be similar. There is such a common reaction of outrage when people hear the details for the first time By 'the details' I mean stuff like the fact that the govt paid for tests on the specific type of cladding later used on Grenfell in 2001, saw it fail so badly that it nearly burned the test facility down and still failed to ban it or check where it had been installed for 16 years

A quick lesson in housing finance:

Social tenants' rents aren't subsidised by your taxes. In fact, they cover the cost of maintaining the home, a chunk of the cost of building new ones and contribute to capital repairs to properties they don't live in Rents and charges paid to councils go into a ring-fenced Housing Revenue Account which covers the entire cost of their housing business, including new build. Housing associations 'general needs social rent' businesses typically generate a margin of around 20%. Here's an example:

81% of social tenants are white, 92% are UK nationals.
The overwhelming majority of immigrant households rent privately.
Social housing is built with initial grant, but its day-to-day running costs are covered by rent. Calling it 'subsidised' is misleading.

https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1742142306310893573

Since early December, this whole 'immigrants get all the social housing' narrative has appeared somewhere almost once a week. It always blurs the lines. Someone, somewhere has decided that this is a clever, emotive argument to push in 2024.

Over the next few months, the new building safety regulator will get 12,500 building safety cases for high rises, which will include structural stability reports. We've already seen problems with older (LPS) towers, modern concrete towers, modern timber towers and modular 1/n This means problems could be pretty widespread. What is our plan if even 2% of the buildings surveyed turn out not to be structurally sound? That's 250 buildings. What if 8 buildings in one medium-sized city which already has a homelessness crisis need to be 'decanted' at once?

Your regular reminder that 81% of new social housing lettings go to white British tenants and 90% go to UK nationals. At a dangerous political moment, please don't let the right establish one of their favourite narratives (lies): that immigrants get all the council housing. And yes, in London, it is still overwhelmingly going to UK nationals. Thanks to the many, many anonymous accounts who have expressed an interest in this particular question! You can find all the data here: app.powerbi.com/view?r=eyJrIjo…

Remember when Gove kicked Grenfell contractor Rydon off the Help to Buy scheme?

Well the company which supplied the combustible insulation is still raking in sales from the public purse, and bragging about it Saint Gobain is a global building materials firm, which owns Isover - a company which mostly makes non-combustible insulation. But in the 2000s, it decided it wanted a piece of the plastic insulation market as well, and targetted a purchase of UK company Celotex:

In August, a tribunal issued the first remediation order against the freeholder in a major step for the new building safety legislation. The judgement is important and you can read it here:

But I want to talk about something else: the expert witness 🧵 assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64d9ebc6…
He is named as 'Mr Brian Martin of DCCH Experts LLP'.

As many of you will know, a Brian Martin was arguably the key witness during the Grenfell Tower Inquiry - the government official who missed multiple critical opportunities to tighten building safety guidance.

New: a judicial review attempting to force the Home Office to reconsider its rejection of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry's recommendation that disabled residents of high rises should get 'personal emergency evacuation plans' has been rejected The judge said the rejection was "essentially a political decision" and while "desperately disappointing for many others that the carefully considered PEEPs recommendations... have not been implanted, but it was not an unlawful decision"

Tomorrow is the sixth anniversary of the Grenfell Tower fire.

Our new research shows that 84% of social housing high rises still don't have sprinklers and 88% don't have block-wide fire alarms.

What happened to 'never again'?

insidehousing.co.uk/home/home/vast… The government was advised to encourage the retrofitting of sprinklers in social housing blocks by the coroner investigating six deaths at Lakanal House 10 years ago. It's three and a half since the Grenfell Tower Inquiry recommended manual fire alarms.

A couple of weeks old, but don't think any UK news outlets have picked up that Arconic - which sold the cladding used on Grenfell Tower - has reached a $74m with shareholders in the US who say it made misleading statements about the safety of its cladding

law360.com/articles/16002… 'Defendants allegedly assured investors... that Reynobond PE products were “safe and compliant,” “fully tested product[s], with building-code approvals throughout the world,” that Arconic “suppl[ies] and use[s] safe and reliable products”...

New documents show Cardinal Lofts - the block with the prohibition notice served this week - was signed off by the local authority despite being plainly non-compliant from the moment it was built

insidehousing.co.uk/news/cardinal-… There's ambiguity about the compliance of some blocks in the building safety crisis. Those with combustible balconies, window panels, Class 0 cladding or below 18m probably complied with official guidance while still breaching headline statutory requirements. Not Cardinal Lofts

Important to be clear that Gove’s announcement on the developers is only a small part of the puzzle in terms of solving the crisis. Takes care of 1,100 blocks (with no set timescale). That’s (at best) 15% of the effected buildings. Still a long way from the end of this story Gove has found a way to get real leverage over the big developers and used it effectively to get as much as he can out of them. He has been unsuccessful so far in getting other parties to cough up. Product manufacturers are at the heart of this and efforts to make them pay have…