Thread: You probably missed an important story this weekend. Cops in Minnesota arrested, sexually assaulted, electronic body-scanned, and mocked for not "speaking English" an Asian-American CNN producer who was covering racial justice protests. (1) documentcloud.org/documents/2061…
Cops from multiple different Minnesota agencies violated a federal court order and abused numerous journalists, including stealing phones, beating them, and torturing them (inflicting serious pain and injury for the purpose of causing pain). These are all federal crimes. (2)
The reaction from the media was to send a sternly worded letter from a lawyer reminding police about the First Amendment and asking them politely not to do it again. A few thoughts: (3)
First, this is not an aberration. Cops have brutally suppressed every movement for social and racial justice in modern US history. We must learn the right lessons: this is what the institution of policing is. It is authoritarian. Police are the greatest threat to democracy. (4)
This is the same reason cops let a white teenager parade around murdering protesters with an illegal assault rifle and then donated to his defense. They are a right-wing fascist formation--they don't care about the 1st Amend. They never will, no matter how fancy the letter. (5)
The most urgent thing we can do to stop race-based police violence but also for any semblance of democracy is reduce their budgets, their power, their surveillance capabilities, and their military weaponry. They have proven that there is no other way. (end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec Karakatsanis

Alec Karakatsanis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @equalityAlec

20 Apr
THREAD: This morning, the New York Times used the jury deliberations in Minnesota as the occasion to get more attention for a newsletter full of "reformist" police propaganda that it sent to untold numbers of NYT readers.
The piece has the usual tactics I have described in other threads: quoting cops as experts, using vague phrase "many experts" to limit the range of debate to "reformist" cop views, using politicized words like "meaningful" without basis, entirely erasing critical views, etc
We will see if @DLeonhardt is open to learning and to reflecting on his own complicity in the everyday violence perpetrated by the police bureaucracy. I hope he is open to a discussion about it.
Read 5 tweets
19 Apr
Overwhelming evidence of federal crimes committed by police against journalists and not a peep from the Biden DOJ. I'm not advocating prosecution, but I'm pointing out that prosecutors only choose to charge *some* people for *some* crimes. There's nothing neutral about it.
Read 4 tweets
18 Apr
Thread: Another embarrassing NYT article on police by @SteveEder and @mhkeller. Not a single proponent of defunding police quoted, and all the usual copaganda tricks. I genuinely wonder if they see their own complicity. nytimes.com/2021/04/18/us/…
They spew police talking points, suggest link btw police and "violent crime," and report as fact that powerful people "designed" these fake reforms to address injustice or that the powerful opposed real change because of genuine "fear" of "violent crime." Shameful naivete.
These reporters like @SteveEder and @mhkeller are complicit in enormous violence. Reach out to people with views outside your bubbles and try to learn something before you write about issues of such consequence to vulnerable people. Here are a few:
Read 7 tweets
15 Apr
THREAD: one of our clients was a 6-year-old Black child. DC police executed an illegal search warrant raid at his house without any probable cause. Cops forced his mother to watch as they grabbed the child and searched inside the little boy's underwear for "contraband." (1)
It turned out that DC cops got hundreds of such warrants for years that blatantly lacked probable cause, executed them without knocking, and at nighttime, searching for small amounts of drugs. 99.2% of these raids were of Black families (2) washingtonpost.com/sf/investigati…
We @CivRightsCorps sued DC seven times for raids on Black families. When we showed DC gov that over 99% of these illegal "training and experience" search warrant raids were for Black families and showed story after story of brutality, DC council/mayor increased police budget. (3)
Read 7 tweets
11 Apr
Thread: Police ignore way more crimes than they address. They only "enforce the law" against some people, some of the time, in some places, and every aspect of it is based on who has power. The idea they pursue "public safety" is propaganda.
Most of what Boston police do is discretionary targeting of poor people for living on the street, drug use, and other minor "crimes." And yet the budget for cop "overtime" alone is twice what Boston spends on all parks and recreation for its people. (2) data.aclum.org/2020/06/05/unp…
Remember when the Boston police went on a rampage to destroy the wheelchairs of disabled people who were homeless? (3) commondreams.org/news/2019/08/0…
Read 4 tweets
7 Apr
Thread: It's not widely known outside legal circles, but in the 1980s Justice Breyer was a main architect of the Sentencing Guidelines, one of the great scandals of mass human caging. But even in legal circles, most people don't understand what a fraud Breyer perpetrated. (1)
There were two main (and many more) frauds perpetrated by elite bureaucrats who designed the Sentencing Guidelines. Hundreds of thousands of poor people and people of color were consigned to millions of extra years in cages as a result of choices Breyer and his group made. (2)
First, the Guidelines purported to be scientific. Elites said they were needed to combat variation among judges. So Breyer and friends did a "past practice study." But after standardizing sentences based on past results as promised, Breyer simply increased them all! (3)
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!