I landed at @LGAairport yesterday and, for the first time, had a @Tesla@Uber Model 3 I was a bit surprised to see. We lived in Brooklyn and drove a Model 3, and I find the charging infrastructure to be incredibly difficult to deal with. Let alone on a fleet level.
(1/5)
From @plugshare, we can see that the only "true" (120kW+) SuperChargers in the NYC metro are in NJ or @JFKairport. If we lower the limit to 70kW, we get a few more options, but if we think that at 120kW, the bare minimum takes 2+ hours to go from 0-100%, it's daunting.
(2//5)
Which got me thinking, how do you drive an @Uber EV and deal with the NYC traffic flows. It wasn't like my driver was nursing the battery as he shuffled through traffic. When we parted ways, I saw him punch into GPS a charger though he was at 245 miles on the "tank."
(3/5)
The only way fleets in NYC get away with the lack of density is by:
1. Chargers EVERYWHERE 2. Change in how fleets are managed 3. Capacity for true superchargers (250kW+)
(4/5)
The argument is that self-driving cars change this dynamic, and yes, that is true, but we are still pretty far off from that dream. It is interesting to watch the dynamics of carbon vs incentives vs laws play out in something as simple as a ride from LGA to Brooklyn.
(5/5)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In between calls, I decided to go split some wood. I find it incredibly relaxing, and it's a great workout. I was thinking about a conversation I had with a buddy about rural communities energy needs. It is a genuine issue in Michigan.
(1/6)
My "fun" activity of splitting wood is life & death for some communities here in Northern Michigan. I am incredibly fortunate that this a hobby and not required for my family's wellbeing. In all the discussions about energy, I find these communities often overlooked.
In my community, the average salary is 24k/yr. A geothermal install is unfathomable, and propane is at least more amicable to personal cash flow despite rising costs.
Those of you fascinated by the SR71 spy plane know that its retirement is considered part of space assets' proliferation. I found it interesting how @SenMarkKelly's question was answered about space capabilities and C2 during the United States Indo-Pacific Command hearing. (1/8)
I will post the video below, but here is the extract of the back and forth w/@INDOPACOM's Admiral Davidson:
Q: in Jan 2007, China conducted an anti-satellite test against one of their own non-operational weather satellites, with a kinetic kill vehicle.
(2/8)
A: We have to build resiliency into our space apparatus that happens with other space assets. It happens with creating airborne and other terrestrial alternatives to fulfil that. And it changes the calculus in space as well.